Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Holder lied to congress under oath- that's illegal.
IRS appointees used their power to target groups that they politically disagreed with- that's illegal
Using your power to engage in subterfuge in order to hamper 1st amendment protection is illegal
Turning your back on 4 Americans that led to their death. Lying about what actually transpired. Setting up a fall guy that is now actually still in jail. ...Criminal- yeah, but worse; immoral and unethical behavior unbecoming leaders!
Yes, because they really believe in social welfare whereas Tea Party members openly say they don't.
Glad you aren't employed at the IRS.
Look what part of "the IRS has apologized for unfairly targeting conservative groups" don't you understand?
What part of " the Inspector General of the Treasury Department found wrong doing within the IRS over the targeting of conservative groups" don't you get?
They shouldn't apologize for doing their job.
The media frenzy about the so-called Obama administration scandals is confusing many people about which side broke the law.
First, let's look at the AP/Fox News leak story.
It is against the law to leak classified information. It's the Justice Department's responsibility to investigate leaks. Whoever leaked the information broke the law and is subject to being prosecuted. The Obama administration is merely following the letter of the law in seeking to punish people leaking classified information. Seems to me the media is having an hysterical meltdown because some of their sources might rightly go to jail.
Next, let's look at the so called IRS scandal. Everybody knows the Tea Party groups are not social welfare organizations. They don't even believe in social welfare. Seems to me the IRS was taking an efficient shortcut by putting them under more scrutiny. It is against the law to claim to be a tax exempt social welfare group, while spending money on political ads which is what they do. It is the Tea Party groups who were/are breaking the law.
Finally, the so-called Benghazi scandal. The bottom line is this: The Obama administration changed talking points about why the attacks occurred for political purposes. I ask...so what? If it was against the law to lie for political purposes, every politician in America would be in jail. No laws were broken. This minor blunder has been totally overblown.
Frankly, I don't think the American people, as a whole, are going to buy any of this nonsense. The only people who care about this are right wingers who hate Obama because he is black.
Yes, because they really believe in social welfare whereas Tea Party members openly say they don't.
you are a parrot..and a liar, they have NEVER said that
Tea Party republicans have voted something like 37 times against The Affordable Care Act. That is pretty clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
Karl Rove's Crossroads has openly engaged in efforts to disenfranchise voters. That is also clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
The New Jersey Tea Party Platform states that welfare recipients should be put in prison.
NY Tea Party Platform: Relocate Welfare Recipients to Prison Dorms
Care to retract your statement that Tea party groups NEVER oppose social welfare?
Yes, because they really believe in social welfare whereas Tea Party members openly say they don't.
you are a parrot..and a liar, they have NEVER said that
Tea Party republicans have voted something like 37 times against The Affordable Care Act. That is pretty clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
Karl Rove's Crossroads has openly engaged in efforts to disenfranchise voters. That is also clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
The New Jersey Tea Party Platform states that welfare recipients should be put in prison.
NY Tea Party Platform: Relocate Welfare Recipients to Prison Dorms
Care to retract your statement that Tea party groups NEVER oppose social welfare?
Social welfare programs created Obabble...the curse of th 21st century.
Glad you aren't employed at the IRS.
Look what part of "the IRS has apologized for unfairly targeting conservative groups" don't you understand?
What part of " the Inspector General of the Treasury Department found wrong doing within the IRS over the targeting of conservative groups" don't you get?
They shouldn't apologize for doing their job.
You're right. They should apologize for breaking the law and be put in jail. Knew you'd understand that.
The media frenzy about the so-called Obama administration scandals is confusing many people about which side broke the law.
First, let's look at the AP/Fox News leak story.
It is against the law to leak classified information. It's the Justice Department's responsibility to investigate leaks. Whoever leaked the information broke the law and is subject to being prosecuted. The Obama administration is merely following the letter of the law in seeking to punish people leaking classified information. Seems to me the media is having an hysterical meltdown because some of their sources might rightly go to jail.
Next, let's look at the so called IRS scandal. Everybody knows the Tea Party groups are not social welfare organizations. They don't even believe in social welfare. Seems to me the IRS was taking an efficient shortcut by putting them under more scrutiny. It is against the law to claim to be a tax exempt social welfare group, while spending money on political ads which is what they do. It is the Tea Party groups who were/are breaking the law.
Finally, the so-called Benghazi scandal. The bottom line is this: The Obama administration changed talking points about why the attacks occurred for political purposes. I ask...so what? If it was against the law to lie for political purposes, every politician in America would be in jail. No laws were broken. This minor blunder has been totally overblown.
Frankly, I don't think the American people, as a whole, are going to buy any of this nonsense. The only people who care about this are right wingers who hate Obama because he is black.
1. Eric Holder lied about the reasons for the search warrant which is a felony
2. According to the law and the US Constitution you cannot use the government to suppress freedom of speech or attack watch dogs in the media
3. To search for a leak you go after the guilty parties, not the person the secrets were leaked to
4. It doesn't matter if the Tea Party is political because if you applied that standard to every tax-exempt group very few would qualify including Media Matters and the NAACP
5. The lies about Benghazi were designed to cover up their obvious mismanagement of the State Department which puts our nation at risk
you are a parrot..and a liar, they have NEVER said that
Tea Party republicans have voted something like 37 times against The Affordable Care Act. That is pretty clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
Karl Rove's Crossroads has openly engaged in efforts to disenfranchise voters. That is also clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
The New Jersey Tea Party Platform states that welfare recipients should be put in prison.
NY Tea Party Platform: Relocate Welfare Recipients to Prison Dorms
Care to retract your statement that Tea party groups NEVER oppose social welfare?
You refuse to learn.
Just becuase YOU think a government program is bnest for society, doesnt mean it is best for society and most certainly doesnt mean OTHERS think it is best for society.
Take the ACA.
You think that is best for society. Fair enough.
I can cite reasons why it is NOT best for society.
1) It will cost more for each individual to be insured
2) It will force many people to switch doctors of thier choices
3) It will cost the taxpayer billions
4) IT FORCES PEOPLE, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OUR NATIONS HISTORY TO HAVE TO BUY SOMETHING FROPM THE MINUTE THEY ARE BORN TO THE MINUITE THEY DIE. tHE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD NEVER FORCE SOMEONE TO BUY SOMETHING.
Now...before you come back with "what about the poor"...and "why do you hate poor people"....
Those who were not insured have been using the ER. Great for them? No. Inconvenient? Yes. Did it meet their medical needs at no cost to them? Yes.
Why was that better than the ACA (in my eyes)?
Becuase inconveneince is what prompts people to strive to do better for themselves.
Now...sure...you can disagree with that premise....and I respect that. But it does not mean that my being against the ACA is becuase I hate poor people....
It is becuase I believe it will give people less reason to strive for a better life.
Now...as I showed you how I respect YOUR Sentiments......are you able to respect mine?
You refuse to learn.
Now...as I showed you how I respect YOUR Sentiments......are you able to respect mine?
First, you insult my intelligence by telling me I "refuse to learn."
Then, you give me this bologna about respecting my sentiments.
You did not show me respect. You are a liar.
you are a parrot..and a liar, they have NEVER said that
Tea Party republicans have voted something like 37 times against The Affordable Care Act. That is pretty clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
Karl Rove's Crossroads has openly engaged in efforts to disenfranchise voters. That is also clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
The New Jersey Tea Party Platform states that welfare recipients should be put in prison.
NY Tea Party Platform: Relocate Welfare Recipients to Prison Dorms
Care to retract your statement that Tea party groups NEVER oppose social welfare?
GAWKER? and you EXPECT people to take you SERIOUS..
you a real joke posting such garbage
Tea Party republicans have voted something like 37 times against The Affordable Care Act. That is pretty clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
Karl Rove's Crossroads has openly engaged in efforts to disenfranchise voters. That is also clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
The New Jersey Tea Party Platform states that welfare recipients should be put in prison.
NY Tea Party Platform: Relocate Welfare Recipients to Prison Dorms
Care to retract your statement that Tea party groups NEVER oppose social welfare?
GAWKER? and you EXPECT people to take you SERIOUS..
you a real joke posting such garbage
What I posted was the truth. I used facts to make you look stupid.
I guess you would get frustrated and call facts "garbage."
Tea Party republicans have voted something like 37 times against The Affordable Care Act. That is pretty clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
Karl Rove's Crossroads has openly engaged in efforts to disenfranchise voters. That is also clearly openly stating their opposition to Social Welfare.
The New Jersey Tea Party Platform states that welfare recipients should be put in prison.
NY Tea Party Platform: Relocate Welfare Recipients to Prison Dorms
Care to retract your statement that Tea party groups NEVER oppose social welfare?
You refuse to learn.
Just becuase YOU think a government program is bnest for society, doesnt mean it is best for society and most certainly doesnt mean OTHERS think it is best for society.
Take the ACA.
You think that is best for society. Fair enough.
I can cite reasons why it is NOT best for society.
1) It will cost more for each individual to be insured
2) It will force many people to switch doctors of thier choices
3) It will cost the taxpayer billions
4) IT FORCES PEOPLE, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OUR NATIONS HISTORY TO HAVE TO BUY SOMETHING FROPM THE MINUTE THEY ARE BORN TO THE MINUITE THEY DIE. tHE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD NEVER FORCE SOMEONE TO BUY SOMETHING.
Now...before you come back with "what about the poor"...and "why do you hate poor people"....
Those who were not insured have been using the ER. Great for them? No. Inconvenient? Yes. Did it meet their medical needs at no cost to them? Yes.
Why was that better than the ACA (in my eyes)?
Becuase inconveneince is what prompts people to strive to do better for themselves.
Now...sure...you can disagree with that premise....and I respect that. But it does not mean that my being against the ACA is becuase I hate poor people....
It is becuase I believe it will give people less reason to strive for a better life.
Now...as I showed you how I respect YOUR Sentiments......are you able to respect mine?
You don't know what you are talking about. The Affordable Care Act will not cost more, nor will it force people to change doctors, and it will probably save taxpayers money.
Here's my point: Tea Party groups openly state their opposition to social welfare. Stephanie falsely claimed they never do. I proved they do.
The media frenzy about the so-called Obama administration scandals is confusing many people about which side broke the law.
First, let's look at the AP/Fox News leak story.
trueIt is against the law to leak classified information. It's the Justice Department's responsibility to investigate leaks. Whoever leaked the information broke the law and is subject to being prosecuted.
The Obama administration is merely following the letter of the law in seeking to punish people leaking classified information.
I don't think so, Smile. Their wire taps were not specifically limited to the investigation at hand. Basically they tapped into the central nexus of all communications and gather information about every incoming and outgoing communication
That's big brotherism, amigo., not "letter of the law" investigating
Seems to me the media is having an hysterical meltdown because some of their sources might rightly go to jail.
Well, look again. And whyile you bear in mind that the PRESS is the only industry singled out in the constitution for SPECIAL hands off consideration
Next, let's look at the so called IRS scandal. Everybody knows the Tea Party groups are not social welfare organizations. They don't even believe in social welfare. Seems to me the IRS was taking an efficient shortcut by putting them under more scrutiny. It is against the law to claim to be a tax exempt social welfare group, while spending money on political ads which is what they do. It is the Tea Party groups who were/are breaking the law.
Like you, I think the IRS scandal is overblown
I do not know who was breaking the law, I doubt you do, either. I'm not sure the law WAS broken.
I think the IRS has the OBLIGATION to carefully vet 501c4s.
Finally, the so-called Benghazi scandal. The bottom line is this: The Obama administration changed talking points about why the attacks occurred for political purposes. I ask...so what? If it was against the law to lie for political purposes, every politician in America would be in jail. No laws were broken. This minor blunder has been totally overblown.
AGreed.
That's why only right wing cracks still think this issue has legs.
Frankly, I don't think the American people, as a whole, are going to buy any of this nonsense. The only people who care about this are right wingers who hate Obama because he is black.
I was with you until you took that CHEAP SHOT because he is black
Ya just couldn't help yourself could ya?
Ya just had to call them racists.
Clearly it is confusing some as to who broke the law if you are going to blame the victims of an oppressive government.
The media frenzy about the so-called Obama administration scandals is confusing many people about which side broke the law.
First, let's look at the AP/Fox News leak story.
It is against the law to leak classified information. It's the Justice Department's responsibility to investigate leaks. Whoever leaked the information broke the law and is subject to being prosecuted. The Obama administration is merely following the letter of the law in seeking to punish people leaking classified information. Seems to me the media is having an hysterical meltdown because some of their sources might rightly go to jail.
Next, let's look at the so called IRS scandal. Everybody knows the Tea Party groups are not social welfare organizations. They don't even believe in social welfare. Seems to me the IRS was taking an efficient shortcut by putting them under more scrutiny. It is against the law to claim to be a tax exempt social welfare group, while spending money on political ads which is what they do. It is the Tea Party groups who were/are breaking the law.
Finally, the so-called Benghazi scandal. The bottom line is this: The Obama administration changed talking points about why the attacks occurred for political purposes. I ask...so what? If it was against the law to lie for political purposes, every politician in America would be in jail. No laws were broken. This minor blunder has been totally overblown.
Frankly, I don't think the American people, as a whole, are going to buy any of this nonsense. The only people who care about this are right wingers who hate Obama because he is black.
1. Holder didn't lie. Holder said no journalists would be prosecuted. The White House confirmned that no journalists would be prosecuted.
2. The Obama administration was not using government to suppress freedom of speech.
3. Not true. To find a leak, it may be necessary to investigate who received the leak. It's perfectly legal to investigate journalists. You do not know what you are talking about.
Now that's funny. Any Republican pulling this kind of stuff would be called on the carpet right away, but since its a dem, it means nothing.
All depends on the party label. Nothing more.
