ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

[The5thHorseman]

stating my qualifications on an internet board is truly insane. That statement is more evidence of how illiterate you really are. Internet master mind is you!!! you go boi

Stop being a lying coward.

You don't have qualifications specific enough to hint at your identity.

In fact, you have no qualifications at all.

 

[The5thHorseman]

what? Do you have some sort of mental health issue? Do what?

Post the numbers.

Do it.


F..ing moron.

 

[jc456]

Stop being a lying coward.

You don't have qualifications specific enough to hint at your identity.

In fact, you have no qualifications at all.

yet you can't comment on the OP, instead dunning kruger word salads. Let's get back on topic,

 

[Billy_Bob]

Isn’t the reason there are no “real” Republicans on the committee because they refused to join? Their complaints ring hollow.

NO there were not. The real republicans were thrown off by Nancy.

 

[jc456]

Post the numbers.

Do it.


F..ing moron.

he did, post #791, he posted 4.8 Trillion. I believe then you word salad him with three years! what three years were you referring to? You said it, not him.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Yet you are incapable of having a sane discussion with points to debate, instead you present chopped salad.

No...I've found that posters who don't know anything will do everything to distract from their ignorance.

This includes insisting they can't understand plain English. Being stand-up douches, they insist that's your fault.

You are far from the first slack jaw to try to play that game.

 

[jc456]

NO there were not. The real republicans were thrown off by Nancy.

correct, Peloser wouldn't let them cross examine.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

This response by Stephanopolous and Brazile shows you everything you need to know to point out the dangerous and destructiveness of today's American media:

Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?”

Both won't accept another side exist in a proceeding that can lead to criminal prosecution of people by the government.
They are perfectly happy with a tribunal where the panel decides what is and what isn't evidence, and won't allow cross examination.
Pretty much the kind of trial you would get in North Korea.

 

[The5thHorseman]

yet you can't comment on the OP, instead dunning kruger word salads. Let's get back on topic,

No, idiot.

Your self serving retelling is twaddle.

I watched the hearings...I called this the minute I read about Grifty's Twitter invite to go to DC and "be wild"....

You averted your eyes.

 

[Billy_Bob]

correct, Peloser wouldn't let them cross examine.

And she would not allow them to ask her questions on the CHP and her roll. There were a lot of reasons she booted them. Pelosi was the reason for Jan 6 happening and the posture she forced on the CHP.

 

[jc456]

This response by Stephanopolous and Brazile shows you everything you need to know to point out the dangerous and destructiveness of today's American media:

Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?”

Both won't accept another side exist in a proceeding that can lead to criminal prosecution of people by the government.
They are perfectly happy with a tribunal where the panel decides what is and what isn't evidence, and won't allow cross examination.
Pretty much the kind of trial you would get in North Korea.

the amount of stupid in those two comment is hilarious. Really. So they are saying there is only a prosecutor in court.

 

[jc456]

I watched the hearings...

I feel sorry for you.

 

[The5thHorseman]

This response by Stephanopolous and Brazile shows you everything you need to know to point out the dangerous and destructiveness of today's American media:

Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?”

Both won't accept another side exist in a proceeding that can lead to criminal prosecution of people by the government.
They are perfectly happy with a tribunal where the panel decides what is and what isn't evidence, and won't allow cross examination.
Pretty much the kind of trial you would get in North Korea.

She is correct.

What you imbeciles cannot be made to understand is that EVERYONE at the WH on the 5th, 6th and 7th of January has testified under oath.

Only two haven't.

Grifty and Meadows.

All the witnesses have told the same story.

There is no narrative, no facts, with which to impeach the existing one.

Do you understand?

There is no one left to save you.

 

[bripat9643]

Bri,

Don't run from the question.

Don't presume to challenge qualifications if you have none.

I have a degree in mechanical engineering, fool.

 

[The5thHorseman]

I feel sorry for you.

Don't....it's why I know so much more than you....that, and the fact that I'm smarter and far better looking.

 

[The5thHorseman]

I have a degree in mechanical engineering, fool.

So you SHOULD be able to determine which of 2 numbers is larger AND calculate a geometric average..

But apparently you can't.

 

[jc456]

..it's why I know so much more than you

what is it you think you know? Why isn't Trump arrested then?

 

[bripat9643]

So you SHOULD be able to determine which of 2 numbers is larger AND calculate a geometric average..

But apparently you can't.

which numbers are you referring to?

 

[Billy_Bob]

She is correct.

What you imbeciles cannot be made to understand is that EVERYONE at the WH on the 5th, 6th and 7th of January has testified under oath.

Only two haven't.

Grifty and Meadows.

All the witnesses have told the same story.

There is no narrative, no facts, with which to impeach the existing one.

Do you understand?

There is no one left to save you.

Bull Shit!

Only those supporting the democrap narrative were questioned. Most of those were shown liars in short order after their testimonies and yet not one has been prosecuted for lying under oath. How convenient.

 

[The5thHorseman]

what is it you think you know? Why isn't Trump arrested then?

Do you know "non sequitur"?