Abortion Doctor GUILTY.. Death penalty looms

Sorry, don't read crazy Religous Sites... Life's too fucking short to give them the bandwith.

Point was, a woman claimed that she went to Gosnell's because the anti-Choice nutters chased her away from a legit clinic.

Mission accomplished, eh?

Yes, crazy religious sites such as Huffington Post...of which you did read or you would not be quoting it. Stop lying. It's not becoming.

Point was...she changed her mind...then was forced to have an abortion, is now sterile due to his hacking of her womb ( mission accomplished indeed...right Joe). And was upset to learn that Gosnell may have butchered her baby like the others he murdered. Sorry, Joe, it was her story ( not yours) you don't get to dictate what her "point" was.

it was her story, but I only pay attention to the RELEVENT parts.

The fact that Gosnell was incompetent wasn't the story here. He was, obviously, but 96,000 Americans are killed by their doctors every year, and millions are maimed by them. And the right wing thinks the biggest problem in medicine is that some of them sue after being maimed.

The relevent part was that she could have gone to a competent doctor, but religious zealots scared her off.

So when we eliminate the deflection you have nothing.
 
Yes, crazy religious sites such as Huffington Post...of which you did read or you would not be quoting it. Stop lying. It's not becoming.

Point was...she changed her mind...then was forced to have an abortion, is now sterile due to his hacking of her womb ( mission accomplished indeed...right Joe). And was upset to learn that Gosnell may have butchered her baby like the others he murdered. Sorry, Joe, it was her story ( not yours) you don't get to dictate what her "point" was.

it was her story, but I only pay attention to the RELEVENT parts.

The fact that Gosnell was incompetent wasn't the story here. He was, obviously, but 96,000 Americans are killed by their doctors every year, and millions are maimed by them. And the right wing thinks the biggest problem in medicine is that some of them sue after being maimed.

The relevent part was that she could have gone to a competent doctor, but religious zealots scared her off.

So when we eliminate the deflection you have nothing.

There's no deflection here.

This woman says she was scared away from the legit clinic because protestors scared her off.

Now, I'm not sure that this is the same woman Blue Jin says it is, because she makes a lot of whacky claims, but honestly, I doubt it.

Point was- Gosnell existed because the rel igous zealots have put so many obstacles between women and legit providers of these services.

Gosnell was like Al Capone selling wood alcohol. The point is, people were still going to get a drink, dammit.
 
I have a problem with religous whacks trying to impose their superstitions on the rest of us, and destroying the middle class in the process.

^ Joes admission he has nothing more to say. Kosher got your goat.

:funnyface:

You mean she gets my blood pressure up by being ass-poundingly stupid like most reliigious whacks.

The real problem isn't that you guys are actually ever going to get to impose your backwards, bronze age superstitions on the rest of us.

It's that you end up destroying the middle class lifestyle our grandparents fought very hard for in the hope that you might.

And here's the thing. Gosnell existed because poor women couldn't afford to get birth control, have the babies or even get an early abortion at a legit clinic.

In short, he exists because you guys have done this to us as a society.

It's kind of like scattering garbage all over your living room, and complaining about the cockroaches.

Your posts make not one damn lick of sense.

You want me to believe that a woman was too poor to afford to go to the store and buy a box of condoms, but not poor enough to where she couldn't pay a few hundred, maybe even thousands, of dollars for an abortion? No, I don't think so; that wouldn't make any sense. If you have money for an abortion, you certainly have money for birth control.

You want me to believe that, contrary to what the law and actuality says, a woman has any trouble trying to get an abortion in today's society? Given the fact that abortions are legal upon request and that there are approximately 1.2M of them per year, I'm going to go ahead and say no. Abortions are already legal and easily accessible. Do you think they should be legal-er?

And finally, you want me to believe that pro-lifers caused Gosnell, even though they've been picketing, praying and protesting outside of his offices for decades? Nope, sorry. That doesn't pass the smell test. If pro-lifers had their way, Gosnell wouldn't have even been in business. No, Joe. Gosnell could operate because of the climate caused by pro-choicers-- a fact attested to by the Grand Jury report.

Deflect less.
 
joe hates women. You don't have to interact with him long to figure that out.

Not quite as much as he hates babies, perhaps...he refers to the babies Gosnell birthed and killed as "medical waste". He's just a revolting, perverted, lying piece of shit who can't hold a job and has nothing better to do than frequent porn sites and jack off to the thought of women getting abused by abortionists during their abortions. That's the way he rolls. If he had money, I've no doubt he would also abuse prostitutes, but I'm doubtful he has $$ for it. Thank goodness, I wouldn't inflict him upon anyone.
 
it was her story, but I only pay attention to the RELEVENT parts.

The fact that Gosnell was incompetent wasn't the story here. He was, obviously, but 96,000 Americans are killed by their doctors every year, and millions are maimed by them. And the right wing thinks the biggest problem in medicine is that some of them sue after being maimed.

The relevent part was that she could have gone to a competent doctor, but religious zealots scared her off.

So when we eliminate the deflection you have nothing.

There's no deflection here.

This woman says she was scared away from the legit clinic because protestors scared her off.

Now, I'm not sure that this is the same woman Blue Jin says it is, because she makes a lot of whacky claims, but honestly, I doubt it.

Point was- Gosnell existed because the rel igous zealots have put so many obstacles between women and legit providers of these services.

Gosnell was like Al Capone selling wood alcohol. The point is, people were still going to get a drink, dammit.

His existence is not based on Anyone's position on anything. That is a deflection. He chose his path. The Victim made Her own choices, too. Too many unknowns and variables to come to that conclusion. It's a big World, there are alternatives.
 
joe hates women. You don't have to interact with him long to figure that out.

Not quite as much as he hates babies, perhaps...he refers to the babies Gosnell birthed and killed as "medical waste". He's just a revolting, perverted, lying piece of shit who can't hold a job and has nothing better to do than frequent porn sites and jack off to the thought of women getting abused by abortionists during their abortions. That's the way he rolls. If he had money, I've no doubt he would also abuse prostitutes, but I'm doubtful he has $$ for it. Thank goodness, I wouldn't inflict him upon anyone.

That aside, what does bother me is the incessant Human Sacrifice to False Gods, that, and those that get rich doing it, profiting off of the misery of Others. Who in their right mind celebrates Abortion?
 
People like joe & noomi. But in their RIGHT MIND? Nobody.

We have a whole subculture of weirdoes who hate humans, PARTICULARLY women and children; they see them as a burden to the earth, a drain on the world's resources, of no use whatever, and they think there should be fewer of them so that THEY can have more of whatever it is they think they aren't getting enough of.
 
Last edited:
Good. Turning that procedure in to a for-profit industry is almost as dumb as banning it.

The abortion industrial complex is a multi-billion a year industry. Profit is the motive - and it's one of the THE most corrupt industries in existence. Bribes and kickbacks are the price for public funding.

This could pull back the curtain a little.
 
Sorry, don't read crazy Religous Sites... Life's too fucking short to give them the bandwith.

Point was, a woman claimed that she went to Gosnell's because the anti-Choice nutters chased her away from a legit clinic.

Mission accomplished, eh?

Do you dream of killing the homeless, Joeb? Those who are defenseless, vulnerable, and not easily missed?
 
Good. Turning that procedure in to a for-profit industry is almost as dumb as banning it.

The abortion industrial complex is a multi-billion a year industry. Profit is the motive - and it's one of the THE most corrupt industries in existence. Bribes and kickbacks are the price for public funding.

This could pull back the curtain a little.

no one ever stops to consider the emotional toll this takes on people either. yea, its a real easy decision to make sometimes when you are faced with an unwanted pregnancy. and they hype it up to be nothing. you aren't taking a life, you are eliminating a problem. but after it is all done and the stresses an pressures are removed, a lot of women relfect on what really transpired and they struggle to deal with it.
 
no one ever stops to consider the emotional toll this takes on people either. yea, its a real easy decision to make sometimes when you are faced with an unwanted pregnancy. and they hype it up to be nothing. you aren't taking a life, you are eliminating a problem. but after it is all done and the stresses an pressures are removed, a lot of women relfect on what really transpired and they struggle to deal with it.

Yes, because taking a human life is a heavy burden.
 
no one ever stops to consider the emotional toll this takes on people either. yea, its a real easy decision to make sometimes when you are faced with an unwanted pregnancy. and they hype it up to be nothing. you aren't taking a life, you are eliminating a problem. but after it is all done and the stresses an pressures are removed, a lot of women relfect on what really transpired and they struggle to deal with it.

Yes, because taking a human life is a heavy burden.

and they know that, which is why they redefined what a human life is when they decided to legalize abortion. before abortion you learned life begins at conception. and that wasn't a religious thing. you learned that in science class.
 
and they know that, which is why they redefined what a human life is when they decided to legalize abortion. before abortion you learned life begins at conception. and that wasn't a religious thing. you learned that in science class.

The left and their media can dehumanize the victims all they like; but at the end of the day, the mother cannot escape the fact that they have ended a human life. Among healthy people, this will have an impact.
 
it was her story, but I only pay attention to the RELEVENT parts.

The fact that Gosnell was incompetent wasn't the story here. He was, obviously, but 96,000 Americans are killed by their doctors every year, and millions are maimed by them. And the right wing thinks the biggest problem in medicine is that some of them sue after being maimed.

The relevent part was that she could have gone to a competent doctor, but religious zealots scared her off.

So when we eliminate the deflection you have nothing.

There's no deflection here.

This woman says she was scared away from the legit clinic because protestors scared her off.

Now, I'm not sure that this is the same woman Blue Jin says it is, because she makes a lot of whacky claims, but honestly, I doubt it.

Point was- Gosnell existed because the rel igous zealots have put so many obstacles between women and legit providers of these services.

Gosnell was like Al Capone selling wood alcohol. The point is, people were still going to get a drink, dammit.
Gee, Joe, you make it sound like a man just convicted of murder is innocent and religious people made someone get herself in trouble because they made a protest.

But in your little groupthink world, free speech is a bitch; mommies who have their own killed and murder can be 'splained away, can it? :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
People like joe & noomi. But in their RIGHT MIND? Nobody.

We have a whole subculture of weirdoes who hate humans, PARTICULARLY women and children; they see them as a burden to the earth, a drain on the world's resources, of no use whatever, and they think there should be fewer of them so that THEY can have more of whatever it is they think they aren't getting enough of.

The truth was and always will be that humans, both men and women, need to realize sex results in having a baby whose life is equally precious to theirs and its induced death is not a civilized option.
 
[

Your posts make not one damn lick of sense.

They do. But they don't make sense if you are like... retarded.


You want me to believe that a woman was too poor to afford to go to the store and buy a box of condoms, but not poor enough to where she couldn't pay a few hundred, maybe even thousands, of dollars for an abortion? No, I don't think so; that wouldn't make any sense. If you have money for an abortion, you certainly have money for birth control.

I think you miss the point. Not having money when you get pregnant isn't the same as saving up for six months to pay for one. Incidently, the only people who paid Gosnell thousands of dollars were rich white women who got to use the nice clean clinic. The poor ones got the clinic with the cat shit.

You want me to believe that, contrary to what the law and actuality says, a woman has any trouble trying to get an abortion in today's society? Given the fact that abortions are legal upon request and that there are approximately 1.2M of them per year, I'm going to go ahead and say no. Abortions are already legal and easily accessible. Do you think they should be legal-er?

You believe in magic sky men, so it's hard to really care what you believe. Reality. Mrs. Mognar- the only victim in this case- had three clinics refuse to perform her abortion before she got around to Gosnell.

Yes, I think they should be legaler- I think the government should pay for them. I think harrassing women outside of them should be a crime.


And finally, you want me to believe that pro-lifers caused Gosnell, even though they've been picketing, praying and protesting outside of his offices for decades? Nope, sorry. That doesn't pass the smell test. If pro-lifers had their way, Gosnell wouldn't have even been in business. No, Joe. Gosnell could operate because of the climate caused by pro-choicers-- a fact attested to by the Grand Jury report.

Deflect less.

The that's the problem, guy YOU ARE NEVER GOING TO GET YOUR WAY on this. What you are going to do is cause problems that result in guys like Gosnell, which is the case here and was the case before the blessings of Roe v. Wade.
 
That's right. Because if you exert any oversight over the abortion industry, they'll just kill more people!

Flipping ghouls.
 
[quo

His existence is not based on Anyone's position on anything. That is a deflection. He chose his path. The Victim made Her own choices, too. Too many unknowns and variables to come to that conclusion. It's a big World, there are alternatives.

Okay, if you want to go there.

The unknowns and variables leading up to THAT DAY put Mrs. Mognar in Gosnel's clinic.

If she had gotten a no hassle abortion at one of the three clinics she had asked earlier, she wouldn't have been there that day.

Again, the rest of the world has figured this out. Abortion is legal, the government pays for them and no one says anything about it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top