Zone1 Abortion Policy Poll

[playtime]

I think it's insane to give a fetus more rights than the woman it's inside.

why not? seems a corporation already does, so why not something not even fully formed & conscience?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

viewpoints are one thing - but to legislate based on faith is totally different.

.

You'll find out what that means.








.

 

[playtime]

.

You'll find out what that means.








.

 

[JoeB131]

.

Wow. Profound. Bet you thought you sounded clever saying that.

.

No, I'm sincere. I think you guys should be running on an "Execute those sluts" platform for women who have abortions.

I think it will go over very well with the electorate.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

No, I'm sincere. I think you guys should be running on an "Execute those sluts" platform for women who have abortions.

I think it will go over very well with the electorate.

.

Typical.

Looking forward to 10 months and 12 days from now.









.

 

[JoeB131]

.

Typical.

Looking forward to 10 months and 12 days from now.

Then you probably should have thought of that before you nominated the crazy person.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Then you probably should have thought of that before you nominated the crazy person.

.

Cute post. Thanks.










.

 

[Captain Caveman]

If you say so, that is a matter of individual belief.

Why do you think women who don't want a baby, get pregnant, then go through the hassle of getting an abortion?

Is it poor education, IQ problems, or what?

It's like, I don't want to damage the bumper on my car, so I pick up a hammer and smash the bumper, and then go through the hassle and expense to get the dent pulled out and repainted.

Just don't whack the bumper, just don't get pregnant.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Each State, give the people a referendum on the abortion matter, or, just simply allow abortions, then the government just needs to apply a 900% sales tax on the procedure to reduce the national debt.

 

[Dadoalex]

This poll is to clarify the mutually exclusive positions that are often conflated on this site.

The question should be phrased to say "at any point prior to viability"

Prior to viability it should only be regulated as to safety and effect. The woman's safety and the effect of terminating the pregnancy.

I do not object to regulating abortion at the national level after viability.

I object to the states' regulation of abortion as the states have clearly demonstrated that neither safety nor effect are part of the regulatory scheme, the only regulatory agenda in the states is keeping women subjugated.

 

[Dadoalex]

Most abortions should be banned.

Why?

 

[Dadoalex]

What other options? You either leave it up to the States or pass a Federal law.

Where is the option for the child in the womb to have a say in their murder?

Not a child.

 

[Dadoalex]

Why do you think women who don't want a baby, get pregnant, then go through the hassle of getting an abortion?

Is it poor education, IQ problems, or what?

It's like, I don't want to damage the bumper on my car, so I pick up a hammer and smash the bumper, and then go through the hassle and expense to get the dent pulled out and repainted.

Just don't whack the bumper, just don't get pregnant.

Ahhh...The Aspirin treatment.

Yes, as dumb as it sounds.

 

[iku]

Not a child.

child

 

[Road Runner]

Why?

Because under most circumstances it is considered murder.

 

[Dadoalex]

Because under most circumstances it is considered murder.

Only among the very stupid.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Coyote your silence screams volume. Thank you.

 

[Road Runner]

Coyote your silence screams volume. Thank you.

That's because she's pro-murder of innocent babies.

 

[DudleySmith]

Government has no business regulating procreation.

It has no business legalizing infanticide.

 

[Coyote]

Coyote your silence screams volume. Thank you.

Unlike you, I have a real offline life to attend to. Since you are stamping your feet and demanding an answer, I will oblige.


What exactly is your question?