About Stormy Daniels...

[tinydancer]

Great free promo for the porn star. She's going on a tour of strip clubs.

 

[tinydancer]

this simply makes the porn star, one of the 12 women that came out during the campaign in 2016 believable now....

it also gets us closer to the truth on the Dossier salacious parts with the prostitutes...makes it more believable....

You just can't let go of the golden showers angle can you? And none of those women that came forward will be believed now that it was discovered they all made $$$$$ for their stories.

 

[Pogo]

Great free promo for the porn star. She's going on a tour of strip clubs.

Eh -- so what. I do that every day.

 

[Pogo]

Can you imagine how batshit crazy the Trump worshippers would be going if Bill Clinton had been banging a pornstar then paid her off?

Out of curiosity,

how many payoffs did Bill make, between his time as governor and president?

Lots.

But that doesn’t matter to you, does it?

Why wouldn't it?


Did he pay them off with HIS money. or donations?

Trump has deep pockets...

Clinton?

Government salary.

Umm... you do realize that any salary, from any source, becomes the recipient's money, right?

If you work for the gummint --- and the gummint then pays you --- at that point that money ceases to be owned by the gummint.

But if you want to trace monetary genealogy ---- guess where Rump's inherited fortune came from.

inherited?

daddy left Donny billions of dollars?

Meaning where Fred Christ's money came from. The FHA.
If you recall Fred was called in to Congress to explain his misuse of those funds that he milked. Whelp --- there's your "government salary".

 

[Leo123]

this simply makes the porn star, one of the 12 women that came out during the campaign in 2016 believable now....

it also gets us closer to the truth on the Dossier salacious parts with the prostitutes...makes it more believable....

Meanwhile you guys totally ignore Clinton the rapist.

 

[Care4all]

this simply makes the porn star, one of the 12 women that came out during the campaign in 2016 believable now....

it also gets us closer to the truth on the Dossier salacious parts with the prostitutes...makes it more believable....

Meanwhile you guys totally ignore Clinton the rapist.

can you really say with a straight face, that his behavior was ignored?

 

[Care4all]

this simply makes the porn star, one of the 12 women that came out during the campaign in 2016 believable now....

it also gets us closer to the truth on the Dossier salacious parts with the prostitutes...makes it more believable....

You just can't let go of the golden showers angle can you? And none of those women that came forward will be believed now that it was discovered they all made $$$$$ for their stories.

nahhh, not the golden showers...never believed the golden showers on Obama's bed bit.... just too kinky for Trump!

 

[Leo123]

this simply makes the porn star, one of the 12 women that came out during the campaign in 2016 believable now....

it also gets us closer to the truth on the Dossier salacious parts with the prostitutes...makes it more believable....

Meanwhile you guys totally ignore Clinton the rapist.

can you really say with a straight face, that his behavior was ignored?

They said it wouldn’t affect his job.

 

[dudmuck]

Common Cause says the hush money was campaign contribution, and should be investigated as such.
I dont know why trump wouldnt just pay this himself, instead of having his campaign pay that.

 

[Imissbush]

That's good Trump screwed up in the payments. The embarrassing details should be kept in the news.

Next time he calls Warren Pocahantas she should call him Spanky

 

[Leo123]

Common Cause says the hush money was campaign contribution, and should be investigated as such.
I dont know why trump wouldnt just pay this himself, instead of having his campaign pay that.

You shouldn't buy Common Cause as an objective source.

"I'll spare you the details of just why Common Cause is such a pack of liberal, partisan doofuses. You can read it here. But in a brief sum-up, they are trying to enlist the Internal Revenue Service to do their dirty work to stifle conservative non-profit groups that are no more or less partisan than Common Cause. Yes, that very same IRS that is working so hard to shut up conservatives already."

Is Common Cause liberal, partisan? We hear from experts

Also...

Common Cause - Media Bias/Fact Check

 

[dudmuck]

Common Cause says the hush money was campaign contribution, and should be investigated as such.
I dont know why trump wouldnt just pay this himself, instead of having his campaign pay that.

You shouldn't buy Common Cause as an objective source.

"I'll spare you the details of just why Common Cause is such a pack of liberal, partisan doofuses. You can read it here. But in a brief sum-up, they are trying to enlist the Internal Revenue Service to do their dirty work to stifle conservative non-profit groups that are no more or less partisan than Common Cause. Yes, that very same IRS that is working so hard to shut up conservatives already."

Is Common Cause liberal, partisan? We hear from experts

Also...

Common Cause - Media Bias/Fact Check

Sure, they might be slightly on the left, but they did go after Clinton Foundation.
The fact still remains that Trump's campaign still did pay the porn star.

 

[Pogo]

Common Cause says the hush money was campaign contribution, and should be investigated as such.
I dont know why trump wouldnt just pay this himself, instead of having his campaign pay that.

You shouldn't buy Common Cause as an objective source.

"I'll spare you the details of just why Common Cause is such a pack of liberal, partisan doofuses. You can read it here. But in a brief sum-up, they are trying to enlist the Internal Revenue Service to do their dirty work to stifle conservative non-profit groups that are no more or less partisan than Common Cause. Yes, that very same IRS that is working so hard to shut up conservatives already."

Is Common Cause liberal, partisan? We hear from experts

Also...

Common Cause - Media Bias/Fact Check

"Who Common Cause is" or what they regularly do is completely irrelevant here. This isn't a news story. It's a complaint requesting investigation of misappropriation of public funds. If such investigation shows the funding was indeed used illegally ---- then it has merit, PERIOD. Doesn't matter "who brings" the complaint.

 

[Leo123]

"Who Common Cause is" or what they regularly do is completely irrelevant here. This isn't a news story. It's a complaint requesting investigation of misappropriation of public funds. If such investigation shows the funding was indeed used illegally ---- then it has merit, PERIOD. Doesn't matter "who brings" the complaint.

According to Dudumck's post Common Cause said she was paid with campaign contributions. However, CC is decidedly leftist. That's why I posted that link. This is just another moronic attempt to 'get Trump.'

 

[Pogo]

"Who Common Cause is" or what they regularly do is completely irrelevant here. This isn't a news story. It's a complaint requesting investigation of misappropriation of public funds. If such investigation shows the funding was indeed used illegally ---- then it has merit, PERIOD. Doesn't matter "who brings" the complaint.

According to Dudumck's post Common Cause said she was paid with campaign contributions. However, CC is decidedly leftist. That's why I posted that link. This is just another moronic attempt to 'get Trump.'

Once AGAIN it doesn't matter even if they are "decidedy leftist". It's a simple one-zero question: DID the Rump campaign misuse public funds or did it not? There are only two possible answers, "yes" or "no". That answer is what an investigation would establish.

Any "bias" you dig up is IRRELEVANT in a simple complaint requesting such investigation. It would be relevant if they were publishing some opinion piece. That's not what this is. This is a complaint to investigate a monetary transaction--- which only recently came to light. Literally anybody could have filed it, and it would be the same complaint.

 

[basquebromance]

Stormy Daniels' interview makes her appear both glamorous and terrifying, a cross between Anna Wintour and The Sphinx.

 

[Leo123]

"Who Common Cause is" or what they regularly do is completely irrelevant here. This isn't a news story. It's a complaint requesting investigation of misappropriation of public funds. If such investigation shows the funding was indeed used illegally ---- then it has merit, PERIOD. Doesn't matter "who brings" the complaint.

According to Dudumck's post Common Cause said she was paid with campaign contributions. However, CC is decidedly leftist. That's why I posted that link. This is just another moronic attempt to 'get Trump.'

Once AGAIN it doesn't matter even if they are "decidedy leftist". It's a simple one-zero question: DID the Rump campaign misuse public funds or did it not? There are only two possible answers, "yes" or "no". That answer is what an investigation would establish.

Any "bias" you dig up is IRRELEVANT in a simple complaint requesting such investigation. It would be relevant if they were publishing some opinion piece. That's not what this is. This is a complaint to investigate a monetary transaction--- which only recently came to light. Literally anybody could have filed it, and it would be the same complaint.

NO!!! I don't care what Common Cause believes.

 

[Pogo]

"Who Common Cause is" or what they regularly do is completely irrelevant here. This isn't a news story. It's a complaint requesting investigation of misappropriation of public funds. If such investigation shows the funding was indeed used illegally ---- then it has merit, PERIOD. Doesn't matter "who brings" the complaint.

According to Dudumck's post Common Cause said she was paid with campaign contributions. However, CC is decidedly leftist. That's why I posted that link. This is just another moronic attempt to 'get Trump.'

Once AGAIN it doesn't matter even if they are "decidedy leftist". It's a simple one-zero question: DID the Rump campaign misuse public funds or did it not? There are only two possible answers, "yes" or "no". That answer is what an investigation would establish.

Any "bias" you dig up is IRRELEVANT in a simple complaint requesting such investigation. It would be relevant if they were publishing some opinion piece. That's not what this is. This is a complaint to investigate a monetary transaction--- which only recently came to light. Literally anybody could have filed it, and it would be the same complaint.

NO!!! I don't care what Common Cause believes.

Once AGAIN what you care about is irrelevant. What matters is whether the funds were illegally derived. And that's what such an investigation would determine. What you, Common Cause, or anyone else "believes" has no bearing on that.

 

[Lakhota]

Go Stormy!

Stormy Daniels to Appear on Jimmy Kimmel After State of the Union

 

[Leo123]

Go Stormy!

Stormy Daniels to Appear on Jimmy Kimmel After State of the Union

Is Jimmy going to have Clinton's rape victims on too?