Absolute proof that people are idiots.

[Peach]

Looks a bit like a rhino actually, and obscure "tweets" are not the best place to locate news stories.

 

[PredFan]

Proof positive that people are idiots:

Barack Hussein Obama was elected.....twice!

 

[Againsheila]

 

[WillowTree]

Proof positive that people are idiots:

Barack Hussein Obama was elected.....twice!

There ya go! Nailed it.

 

[Pogo]

Steven Spielberg is gulity of hunting dinosaurs.

More at the link.

Sadness: These People On Facebook Thought Steven Spielberg Killed This Triceratops | Geekologie

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

 

[Pogo]

Oh dear god, how could this person possibly ever have the intelligence to use Twitter ?!!

I don't do either one but I believe this is Nosebook isn't it?

Isn't Twit limited to 140 characters?

 

[Esmeralda]

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

That's what I was thinking, if this example of abject stupidity isn't actually some form of satire. It's just a bit too extreme to be true given the way the ideas are expressed. Which makes everyone snickering look pretty foolish.

 

[R.D.]

[ame=http://youtu.be/zNZczIgVXjg]3-25-2010_Hank_Johnson_Guam_Tip_Over.wmv - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Pogo]

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

That's what I was thinking, if this example of abject stupidity isn't actually some form of satire. It's just a bit too extreme to be true given the way the ideas are expressed. Which makes everyone snickering look pretty foolish.

-- which would be ironic given the thread title, since it takes intelligence to get satire...

 

[R.D.]

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

That's what I was thinking, if this example of abject stupidity isn't actually some form of satire. It's just a bit too extreme to be true given the way the ideas are expressed. Which makes everyone snickering look pretty foolish.

-- which would be ironic given the thread title, since it takes intelligence to get satire...

You'll defend anything if you think its liberal

The post was satire, many of the responses are who the idiots.

 

[Pogo]

That's what I was thinking, if this example of abject stupidity isn't actually some form of satire. It's just a bit too extreme to be true given the way the ideas are expressed. Which makes everyone snickering look pretty foolish.

-- which would be ironic given the thread title, since it takes intelligence to get satire...

You'll defend anything if you think its liberal

The post was satire, many of the responses are who the idiots.

How is an assessment that a Nosebook post may have been made in jest... "liberal"?
Or even 'political'?

And if you're agreeing that it is satire, aren't you agreeing with me in that assessment anyway?

Weird post.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Steven Spielberg is gulity of hunting dinosaurs.

More at the link.

Sadness: These People On Facebook Thought Steven Spielberg Killed This Triceratops | Geekologie

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

It's possible, however the way some of the posts are worded it seems some were being serious.

 

[R.D.]

-- which would be ironic given the thread title, since it takes intelligence to get satire...

You'll defend anything if you think its liberal

The post was satire, many of the responses are who the idiots.

How is an assessment that a Nosebook post may have been made in jest... "liberal"?
Or even 'political'?

And if you're agreeing that it is satire, aren't you agreeing with me in that assessment anyway?

Weird post.

I didn't quote your Nosebook post.

The op never mentioned liberals, neither did I. But you assumed they were, too

 

[Pogo]

You'll defend anything if you think its liberal

The post was satire, many of the responses are who the idiots.

How is an assessment that a Nosebook post may have been made in jest... "liberal"?
Or even 'political'?

And if you're agreeing that it is satire, aren't you agreeing with me in that assessment anyway?

Weird post.

I didn't quote your Nosebook post.

The op never mentioned liberals, neither did I. But you assumed they were, too

What's the word in bold above- "chopped liver"? You brought up 'liberal', not I. Nor did I mention politics, because this isn't a politics story. And I use story generously.

And I have no Nosebook posts. I've refused to use that thing as I'm not into voyeurism. Truth to tell I can't think of any human activity more meaningless with the possible exception of The Twit.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Steven Spielberg is gulity of hunting dinosaurs.

More at the link.

Sadness: These People On Facebook Thought Steven Spielberg Killed This Triceratops | Geekologie

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

Did you read the link I posted?

Didn't think so.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

That's what I was thinking, if this example of abject stupidity isn't actually some form of satire. It's just a bit too extreme to be true given the way the ideas are expressed. Which makes everyone snickering look pretty foolish.

-- which would be ironic given the thread title, since it takes intelligence to get satire...

Which explains why you never get it.

 

[Pogo]

That's what I was thinking, if this example of abject stupidity isn't actually some form of satire. It's just a bit too extreme to be true given the way the ideas are expressed. Which makes everyone snickering look pretty foolish.

-- which would be ironic given the thread title, since it takes intelligence to get satire...

Which explains why you never get it.

That's brilliant, since I'm the one who made the suggestion in the first place.

Wacko.

 

[Pogo]

Steven Spielberg is gulity of hunting dinosaurs.

More at the link.

Sadness: These People On Facebook Thought Steven Spielberg Killed This Triceratops | Geekologie

Umm...

How do we know these posts weren't satire?

I mean I see that it says "he should not have shot that animal" when there's no evidence the animal was "shot"...

Then again he is a movie maker, and 'shooting' is what directors do.... I'm not much of a movie watcher so far as I'm concerned there are a whole lot of things that shouldn't have been shot.

Did you read the link I posted?

Didn't think so.

Your link gives no more info than you posted. So when you said "more at the link", you lied. There is no "more".

Wacko.

 

[R.D.]

How is an assessment that a Nosebook post may have been made in jest... "liberal"?
Or even 'political'?

And if you're agreeing that it is satire, aren't you agreeing with me in that assessment anyway?

Weird post.

I didn't quote your Nosebook post.

The op never mentioned liberals, neither did I. But you assumed they were, too

What's the word in bold above- "chopped liver"? You brought up 'liberal', not I. Nor did I mention politics, because this isn't a politics story. And I use story generously.

And I have no Nosebook posts. I've refused to use that thing as I'm not into voyeurism. Truth to tell I can't think of any human activity more meaningless with the possible exception of The Twit.

It's simple really. You always try too hard

You defended stupidity. We all know you did it because, like most of us, you assumed the idiots were liberals. Otherwise you too would have laughed at the stupid. This place isn't vacuum, we know from other threads and posts how each other behaves and reacts.

 

[hazlnut]

What are the bag limits on Triceratops?