insolent imp
Platinum Member
- Apr 20, 2022
- 1,718
- 828
I thought the new bill was supposed to help gays.Well, SCOTUS determined the laws violate the constitution.
Although some people are hoping that the new SCOTUS is going to overturn that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought the new bill was supposed to help gays.Well, SCOTUS determined the laws violate the constitution.
Although some people are hoping that the new SCOTUS is going to overturn that.
I guess too many intelligent people don't like brainless bigotry wrapped in a veneer of religion.Go here for the news.
If parents don't want their kids listening to what Kirk has written about, what makes them think that there is an obligation to bring their kids to such a gathering?
God bless you and Kirk always!!!
Holly
Why not? A gay marriage ceremony just two people living their lives according to their own moral code.
it's a public library not a school.If he is promoting religious nonsense he doesn't belong there anymore than the queers do.
Fuck the radicals from both sides.
School is for learning ABC's and not to be preached to from ANY ideology
So the problem is that the gay couple isn’t adhering to the Christian’s moral code.And viewed as sinful by some others, others you want to force to celebrate said sin.
So the problem is that the gay couple isn’t adhering to the Christian’s moral code.
Dodge.The problem is people like you thinking government force is mandated in this situation.
Dodge.
The problem for the baker is that the gay couple isn’t behaving according to the baker’s own moral code.
That means they’re enforcing their morals into others rather than accepting other people who live by different moral codes.
Oh so irrelevant then.
So the baker gets to apply their morals to everyone else then?Not a dodge, the crux of the issue. Government deciding who's butthurt is more "righteous", no actual damages involved.
The couple can go to another baker, which is far less intrusive than forcing the baker to either quit baking or go against their morals.
So the baker gets to apply their morals to everyone else then?
Exactly.
he had to take a hard lesson on bananas after he humiliated himself on the subject.He has a TV show that teaches end times heresies.
The gay couple doesn’t have a problem with the baker being straight (or anyone else for that matter).So the gay couple gets to apply their morals on the baker?
he had to take a hard lesson on bananas after he humiliated himself of the subject.
The gay couple doesn’t have a problem with the baker being straight (or anyone else for that matter).
So that’s not what’s happening.
You keep dodging the actual issue the baker has, the marriage, actually participating in an event celebrating it.
They find it against their morals. They are on record saying they don't deny point of sale items to anyone.
You just can't get it through your dime store head that it's about the government force, in particular government force taking sides in something as trivial as this.