Admitting Putin picked Trump means that USMB Cons would have to admit...

[Manonthestreet]

 

[eddiew37]

Putin didn't pick Trump. Putin fell for the propaganda that the criminal enterprise known as the mainstream media planted. Putin thought Hillary would win and his agents tried to do everything they could to disrupt the election just like they have been doing since Kruschev pounded his shoe on the U.N. table and scared the shit out of everyone. The problem for the left is that Putin's agents did not succeed any better than they ever did in penetrating the U.S. electoral system. That's why Barry Hussein didn't care and John McCain didn't bother to alert his Armed Services Committee before the election. Ironically it seems that Russia has become the left's latest fantasy in their forlorn hope to delegitimize Trump's victory.

Did not Trump ask Putin to keep sending the E mails all the while bashing Hillary with them??? So how can he say the release of the mail had no affect Does he always talk out of both sides of his mouth?

The emails would have had no effect had they not revealed the dishonesty and conniving on the part of libs. We knew it all along...and so did you.

I'm not convinced the emails did have an effect. I have yet to see a single person say WikiLeaks influenced their vote against Clinton.

I don't know if they did or didn't but trump certainly tried by using them Intel says " Hacks were ordered by putin to hurt Clinton"

 

[ClosedCaption]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Actually, it means you should produce some evidence!

Asking for evidence is the same as you claiming the emails uncovered "corruption". No matter how much evidence you get, you'll ask for more pretending there is something missing that would convice you.

Now you have the Intel report which you begged for. And you think saying it doesn't exist, you think, means something.

So post the piece that says that the elections were hacked. just post that piece thank you

By the way dip shit they never looked at the DNC server Duh

Why would you ask for a piece of evidence to something we aren't talking about?

 

[ClosedCaption]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

There is NO EVIDENCE that Mr. Putin interfered in our elections.

Assuming, for arguments sake, that he did

then Russia's and the US' NATIONAL SECURITY

demanded that he take action in order to prevent a mad woman from starting WWIII.


.

You mean there's no evidence available to the public, meaning you and the rest of us. Unless there's something you can't tell us because you'd have to kill us.
God you idiots are stupid.

If the evidence isn't available to the public, then how do you know the Democrats' sleazy accusations are true?

You misspelled Everyone.

 

[Avatar4321]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

There is NO EVIDENCE that Mr. Putin interfered in our elections.

Assuming, for arguments sake, that he did

then Russia's and the US' NATIONAL SECURITY

demanded that he take action in order to prevent a mad woman from starting WWIII.


.

You mean there's no evidence available to the public, meaning you and the rest of us. Unless there's something you can't tell us because you'd have to kill us.
God you idiots are stupid.

How on earth can you be upset with someone or consider them stupid for not believing something based off of evidence that may or mat not exist to which they have no access?

 

[Avatar4321]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Let's try something. Do you know why Russia didn't like Hillary? Any idea? Let's take a moment and consider. It was Hillary's State Department that approved and endorsed the idea of funneling weapons into Syria to gin up a "civil war" made up primarily of foreign fighters in the "rebels". These weapons were funneled through with a lot of assistance from the State Department. The move didn't have a damned thing to do with Assad, but had everything to do with denying the Russians access to their one Naval Base in the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Now, when this bogged down, the State Department decided to go after the next best thing, taking the Naval Base from the Russians that is located in Ukraine. This saw radical nationalists take control of the nation, and Russia promptly acted to safe their base and fought back.

Weapons funneled from Libya to Syria. The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

Hillary and Obama and the Democrats essentially declared war on Russia, and are mad that Russia refused to be defeated in Syria, and then took the base in Ukraine, and then fought back smart. All the billions of dollars to fight the Russians in Syria, all the effort, lost. Then the same result in Ukraine, and now defeated in the ballot box at home.

Sun Tzu would approve. But let's take the last part of your post shall we? I mean, now we understand why Russia would be pissed. We would have bombed the crap out of Russia if they had ginned up a bunch of terrorist groups and threatened our Naval Bases, but we're moving along. What "agit prop" did they release? The Hackers, if they were Russians, and I wouldn't doubt that they would have plenty of reason, released the truth.

Now, I don't understand something. Perhaps you can help me. The job of a Journalist is to report the facts, report the truth. The job of a voter is to weigh the information available, and make the best decision possible in the voting booth. To make that good decision, the voter needs access to information, truthful information. So the horrible thing that the hackers did was tell the truth. This is the propaganda you decry. The truth.

When did we become terrified of the truth? When did we become outraged because someone spoke the truth? What the hell happened to our nation that we claim that truth is propaganda?

One of my longstanding complaints about Hillary is based on her record. She keeps trying to do things and manage these clever plans. Unfortunately, she's always just short of clever enough to make them actually work. No matter how much she screws up, everyone says she's got great experience. We know Hillary is Corrupt, and all the Hackers did was expose the corruption going on in the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. Did it make a difference? Perhaps a tiny difference. All it did was prove to those who already believed that Hillary and the DNC were corrupt. It was proof of the image that the DNC and Hillary had already created. A sense of entitlement, and that the DNC existed solely to get Hillary elected. It exposed the sham primary where a handful of also ran candidates were supposed to give the illusion that Hillary was the choice by a wide margin.

The job is to represent the people, and we can't choose our representative unless we know the truth about them, and what they've done. That's all the Hackers did, confirm to those who already believed that Hillary was corrupt, that Hillary was in fact corrupt.

How do you know the hackers told the truth ?.... and the intel plainly shows that Russia favored repubs and trump

We know the hackers told the truth because:

1) no one has denied what's in the emails.
2) the argument to blame the Russians is framed in a way where they concede that the information is correct.

If the information was false the talking points would be that it's false and made up. Not that the Russians interferes with the election.

 

[Papageorgio]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

So they will have to believe the Democratic Party conspired to rig the primaries and dupe the Democrats to vote Clinton over Sanders, which the did quite well.

For all the released emails, they were never denied. So people based their vote on facts.

That said, the Russians have no business in our elections.

 

[Avatar4321]

Admitting that Putin picked Trump is the same as admitting that Putin has more patriotism toward the USA than democrats.

Nope, and just because you want to cover your sudden love for other nations spying on the U.S. we both know this is the way you cope with being conned.

The DNC is a private organization. Hacking it does not constitute spring on the united states.

And assuming Russia is behind the wikileak drops, how exactly does Russia con someone by releasing accurate information?

First off Is it accurate? I have my doubts and 2nd Why no hacking RNC or are repub hands clean??? I doubt that too

Accuracy was conceded weeks ago

The rnc wasn't hacked because they aren't stupid enough to fall for a phishing scheme. Wouldn't surprise me if they were up to schemes either.

 

[Tom Horn]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

You might want to admit you know nothing about how agit/prop works before you bandy those words about. There was nothing in the LEAKED emails that wasn't true...they were genuine. The colostomy-bagged old criminal's popularity was the same 48% at the end of the leaks than before the leaks. And no evidence was found of voting machine rigging other than by ghetto rats in the inner-cities.....some "agit/prop".

 

[eddiew37]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

You might want to admit you know nothing about how agit/prop works before you bandy those words about. There was nothing in the LEAKED emails that wasn't true...they were genuine. The colostomy-bagged old criminal's popularity was the same 48% at the end of the leaks than before the leaks. And no evidence was found of voting machine rigging other than by ghetto rats in the inner-cities.....some "agit/prop".

And of course no suppression ? something repubs excel at

 

[Dalia]

If Hillary would not have gapped with her emails the Russians would not have had much to put under there teeths and there was an investigation by the FBI she acted as if it were not serious and which she Would not do it anymore,

 

[Dalia]

Given it was the rooshins, Putin picked whoever wasn't hillary, just like millions of Americans.

Different reasons for that, of course, as he had a personal axe to grind with hillary, while many americans just thought she was a dung pile, but putin's actions, if there were any, likely had more to do with hillary than trump.

The left likes to ignore that, as it knocks their "he's illegitimate" narrative off the rails, but hillary herself has acknowledged that grudge.

Funny how everyone forgot that the média was for Hillary during the 3 débate execption of FoxNew that is why it was a big surprise that Trump win ( a good one i said) the média in France was for Hillary because the brainswashing happen here to during the débate worst CNN the Américan Station only in France did everything to help Hillary so much joy when the grabbing pussy storie came out a Breaking new almost all day.
They were so sure of winning they drop down same for French média they keep on saying : what happen and what going on ?

Is this funny too?
And still, the assholes vote Republican. That is beyond stupid, beyond ignorance, beyond vengeful. THAT IS CRIMINAL AND TREASONOUS!

CNN alaways talk just against Trump only him

 

[Tom Horn]

And of course no suppression ? something repubs excel at

Really? you believe that? Here's a tall flash for you.....FELONS can't vote, tough shit...do the crime, do the time and lose your citizen rights. Maybe more blacks should consider the consequences of the gangsta life before they take that path.

 

[SavannahMann]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Let's try something. Do you know why Russia didn't like Hillary? Any idea? Let's take a moment and consider. It was Hillary's State Department that approved and endorsed the idea of funneling weapons into Syria to gin up a "civil war" made up primarily of foreign fighters in the "rebels". These weapons were funneled through with a lot of assistance from the State Department. The move didn't have a damned thing to do with Assad, but had everything to do with denying the Russians access to their one Naval Base in the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Now, when this bogged down, the State Department decided to go after the next best thing, taking the Naval Base from the Russians that is located in Ukraine. This saw radical nationalists take control of the nation, and Russia promptly acted to safe their base and fought back.

Weapons funneled from Libya to Syria. The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

Hillary and Obama and the Democrats essentially declared war on Russia, and are mad that Russia refused to be defeated in Syria, and then took the base in Ukraine, and then fought back smart. All the billions of dollars to fight the Russians in Syria, all the effort, lost. Then the same result in Ukraine, and now defeated in the ballot box at home.

Sun Tzu would approve. But let's take the last part of your post shall we? I mean, now we understand why Russia would be pissed. We would have bombed the crap out of Russia if they had ginned up a bunch of terrorist groups and threatened our Naval Bases, but we're moving along. What "agit prop" did they release? The Hackers, if they were Russians, and I wouldn't doubt that they would have plenty of reason, released the truth.

Now, I don't understand something. Perhaps you can help me. The job of a Journalist is to report the facts, report the truth. The job of a voter is to weigh the information available, and make the best decision possible in the voting booth. To make that good decision, the voter needs access to information, truthful information. So the horrible thing that the hackers did was tell the truth. This is the propaganda you decry. The truth.

When did we become terrified of the truth? When did we become outraged because someone spoke the truth? What the hell happened to our nation that we claim that truth is propaganda?

One of my longstanding complaints about Hillary is based on her record. She keeps trying to do things and manage these clever plans. Unfortunately, she's always just short of clever enough to make them actually work. No matter how much she screws up, everyone says she's got great experience. We know Hillary is Corrupt, and all the Hackers did was expose the corruption going on in the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. Did it make a difference? Perhaps a tiny difference. All it did was prove to those who already believed that Hillary and the DNC were corrupt. It was proof of the image that the DNC and Hillary had already created. A sense of entitlement, and that the DNC existed solely to get Hillary elected. It exposed the sham primary where a handful of also ran candidates were supposed to give the illusion that Hillary was the choice by a wide margin.

The job is to represent the people, and we can't choose our representative unless we know the truth about them, and what they've done. That's all the Hackers did, confirm to those who already believed that Hillary was corrupt, that Hillary was in fact corrupt.

How do you know the hackers told the truth ?.... and the intel plainly shows that Russia favored repubs and trump

Because nobody in the DNC or Hillary's campaign has said the emails were false.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Admitting that Putin picked Trump is the same as admitting that Putin has more patriotism toward the USA than democrats.

Nope, and just because you want to cover your sudden love for other nations spying on the U.S. we both know this is the way you cope with being conned.

The DNC is a private organization. Hacking it does not constitute spring on the united states.

And assuming Russia is behind the wikileak drops, how exactly does Russia con someone by releasing accurate information?

That's another stupid thing about the left's claims. The Russians allegedly hacked into Podesta and Hillary's private emails. But they are screaming about it as if they had hacked into the Pentagon itself. Hell, John Posestra's email password was "password" for fuck's sake.

I can't wait to hear your excuses on why them hacking Republicans and power grid computer's is also not enough of a big deal for you.

Its ALL good..whatever it is.

 

[jc456]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

You're only pissed that Hillary's criminality and corruption were exposed and that the country was saved from being run by a crime family. That's genuine treason.

What criminality ? What corruption?? All republican BS and you guys eat it up And crime family?? LOL LOL who tf you think is entering our WH on the 20th? How many of your swamp people have business connections with our enemy Russia??

Then what is it you're concerned about, if there was nothing exposed? Now you're really lost! You should start bing drinking

 

[jc456]

Admitting that Putin picked Trump is the same as admitting that Putin has more patriotism toward the USA than democrats.

Nope, and just because you want to cover your sudden love for other nations spying on the U.S. we both know this is the way you cope with being conned.

The DNC is a private organization. Hacking it does not constitute spring on the united states.

And assuming Russia is behind the wikileak drops, how exactly does Russia con someone by releasing accurate information?

That's another stupid thing about the left's claims. The Russians allegedly hacked into Podesta and Hillary's private emails. But they are screaming about it as if they had hacked into the Pentagon itself. Hell, John Posestra's email password was "password" for fuck's sake.

I can't wait to hear your excuses on why them hacking Republicans and power grid computer's is also not enough of a big deal for you.

Its ALL good..whatever it is.

Fake news proven! Got any thing else?

 

[jc456]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop. They fell for the hustle so now they are forced to either be even more supportive of Trump and Putin, pretend it's not a big deal (feelings debate), or they would have to admit to being fools.

So when you wonder why the cons suddenly see Russia as a force of good...it's simply a cover for being stupid enough to fall for it.

Let's try something. Do you know why Russia didn't like Hillary? Any idea? Let's take a moment and consider. It was Hillary's State Department that approved and endorsed the idea of funneling weapons into Syria to gin up a "civil war" made up primarily of foreign fighters in the "rebels". These weapons were funneled through with a lot of assistance from the State Department. The move didn't have a damned thing to do with Assad, but had everything to do with denying the Russians access to their one Naval Base in the entire Mediterranean Sea.

Now, when this bogged down, the State Department decided to go after the next best thing, taking the Naval Base from the Russians that is located in Ukraine. This saw radical nationalists take control of the nation, and Russia promptly acted to safe their base and fought back.

Weapons funneled from Libya to Syria. The Benghazi outrage we actually should be talking about

Hillary and Obama and the Democrats essentially declared war on Russia, and are mad that Russia refused to be defeated in Syria, and then took the base in Ukraine, and then fought back smart. All the billions of dollars to fight the Russians in Syria, all the effort, lost. Then the same result in Ukraine, and now defeated in the ballot box at home.

Sun Tzu would approve. But let's take the last part of your post shall we? I mean, now we understand why Russia would be pissed. We would have bombed the crap out of Russia if they had ginned up a bunch of terrorist groups and threatened our Naval Bases, but we're moving along. What "agit prop" did they release? The Hackers, if they were Russians, and I wouldn't doubt that they would have plenty of reason, released the truth.

Now, I don't understand something. Perhaps you can help me. The job of a Journalist is to report the facts, report the truth. The job of a voter is to weigh the information available, and make the best decision possible in the voting booth. To make that good decision, the voter needs access to information, truthful information. So the horrible thing that the hackers did was tell the truth. This is the propaganda you decry. The truth.

When did we become terrified of the truth? When did we become outraged because someone spoke the truth? What the hell happened to our nation that we claim that truth is propaganda?

One of my longstanding complaints about Hillary is based on her record. She keeps trying to do things and manage these clever plans. Unfortunately, she's always just short of clever enough to make them actually work. No matter how much she screws up, everyone says she's got great experience. We know Hillary is Corrupt, and all the Hackers did was expose the corruption going on in the DNC and the Clinton Campaign. Did it make a difference? Perhaps a tiny difference. All it did was prove to those who already believed that Hillary and the DNC were corrupt. It was proof of the image that the DNC and Hillary had already created. A sense of entitlement, and that the DNC existed solely to get Hillary elected. It exposed the sham primary where a handful of also ran candidates were supposed to give the illusion that Hillary was the choice by a wide margin.

The job is to represent the people, and we can't choose our representative unless we know the truth about them, and what they've done. That's all the Hackers did, confirm to those who already believed that Hillary was corrupt, that Hillary was in fact corrupt.

How do you know the hackers told the truth ?.... and the intel plainly shows that Russia favored repubs and trump

How? Didn't get to see the classified material how do you know anything, you're a puppet

 

[jc456]

So, the left is pissed that the Russians used their corruption against them? Nothing like shooting the messenger.

No not pissed over that Pissed over the love you repubs have for Putin over the love of the protectors of our country I call your republicans traitors

You're only pissed that Hillary's criminality and corruption were exposed and that the country was saved from being run by a crime family. That's genuine treason.

What criminality ? What corruption?? All republican BS and you guys eat it up And crime family?? LOL LOL who tf you think is entering our WH on the 20th? How many of your swamp people have business connections with our enemy Russia??

Selling her office for financial gain is corrupt, obviously. So was allowing four of her employees to be killed because keeping them alive and safe wasn't politically expedient. Then there were her numerous gross violations of our secrecy laws.

She allowed nothing just repub BS And selling her office ? Man you repubs are biggest suckers in the world

What was the hack?

 

[jc456]

That's they were duped with Russian agit prop.

Waiting for definitive evidence while refusing to take Barry's word for it and 'being duped' are two seperate things, CC. You should attempt to fully comprehend that...except your partisanship presents a challenge to your doing so.

The funny thing about this new argument of theirs is that out of one side of their mouths, they are saying that the emails exposed no corruption at all, and out of the other side of their mouths, they are saying that the emails damaged Hillary's chances of winning. They can't have both things no matter how hard they try.

^^^^EXACTLY