Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Firing Comey is a no brainer, Comey should also be prosecuted for leaking. The fucking FBI director is a leak?I am truly stunned. Even if the information is not considered classified, leaking is a felony that carries a minimum one year prison term. You would think the FBI director would know that and avoid testifying that he engaged in a felony before the US Senate.
Well, you would think that the Republican nominee would be able to win an election based on the merits of the ideas and not enlist a foreign power to help. You seem mad that people found out Trump was employing shenanigans, more than you're mad about the shenanigans themselves. If Hillary Clinton had enlisted the help of a foreign power to hack into the RNC, Conservatives' heads would have literally exploded.
it was forced on States that didn't want to change their marriage license requirements via judicial action.
And why not? Because they're bigots.
I am actually for SSM, as long as it is passed by the people of the State in question. It is not a Federal right, or a federal matter, except when it comes to requiring States to recognize a valid marriage license from any other State, just like they do now.
How is marriage a state issue and not a federal one? When you file your federal taxes, do you file as a married person if you are married?
Objections to homosexual acts are part of most major religions. So all religious people are bigots?
Marriage licenses are issued by the States. There is no part of the constitution that delegates that power to the federal government, so by default it falls to the State legislatures.
The feds just use marriage as a tax parameter. they don't have anything else to do with it.
I don't agree with that. Indeed, I have to say that the comportment shown by each of the intelligence committee senators who spoke today was what I expect from all elected and appointed officials, and for the most part -- though more often behind closed doors and in private settings where they aren't forced to "dance the political jig" -- they are. Obviously, there are exceptions, and sadly those individuals cast a pallor over nearly the whole remainder of government.I think it's clear that everyone in Washington is shady .
What federal law says SSM is a right?
The 14th Amendment. Kennedy cited it in his decision on the SSM case.
Firing Comey is a no brainer, Comey should also be prosecuted for leaking. The fucking FBI director is a leak?
Well, you would think that the Republican nominee would be able to win an election based on the merits of the ideas and not enlist a foreign power to help. You seem mad that people found out Trump was employing shenanigans, more than you're mad about the shenanigans themselves. If Hillary Clinton had enlisted the help of a foreign power to hack into the RNC, Conservatives' heads would have literally exploded.
"Well, you would think that the Republican nominee would be able to win an election based on the merits of the ideas and not enlist a foreign power to help. You seem mad that people found out Trump was employing shenanigans,..."
1. "Well, you would think that the Republican nominee would be able to win an election based on the merits of the ideas."
This would suggest that you are unaware of the bias instilled by the media and the schools.
Clearly, you're a government school grad.
2. "not enlist a foreign power to help."
The only group associated with a foreign power are the Democrats.
There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:
The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.
The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.
"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™
Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President
And this:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal
...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.
....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
And
"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance
And
"EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"
EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank
You're too stupid to understand this...but the old saying is true: to know what the Left is guilty of, see what they blame the other side of doing.
-----------------------------------------------------------
News anchor highlights all of the known links to Russia
it was forced on States that didn't want to change their marriage license requirements via judicial action.
And why not? Because they're bigots.
I am actually for SSM, as long as it is passed by the people of the State in question. It is not a Federal right, or a federal matter, except when it comes to requiring States to recognize a valid marriage license from any other State, just like they do now.
How is marriage a state issue and not a federal one? When you file your federal taxes, do you file as a married person if you are married?
Objections to homosexual acts are part of most major religions. So all religious people are bigots?
Marriage licenses are issued by the States. There is no part of the constitution that delegates that power to the federal government, so by default it falls to the State legislatures.
The feds just use marriage as a tax parameter. they don't have anything else to do with it.
Marriage is not a state issue.
Oh please Comey is a disloyal corrupt sneaky backstabber. The first few minutes of his testimony wasTrump fired me
Disloyal to what? It's certainly not the truth to which his allegiance fails. It's quite clear that one cannot say that of the current POTUS or Atty General. And, frankly, one's being loyal to the truth is more important than is one's fealty to any group, individual or title.Oh please Comey is a disloyal corrupt sneaky backstabber.
o you are in favor of the top LEO in the nation openly engaging in felonies?
What felony? That he let everyojne know Trump was colluding with Russia? Why are you more upset that people know about the collusion than you are about the actual collusion?
Moreso than this world class liar in our WHI found him believable .
You think hilary and bill clinton, the rapist are believable.
it was forced on States that didn't want to change their marriage license requirements via judicial action.
And why not? Because they're bigots.
I am actually for SSM, as long as it is passed by the people of the State in question. It is not a Federal right, or a federal matter, except when it comes to requiring States to recognize a valid marriage license from any other State, just like they do now.
How is marriage a state issue and not a federal one? When you file your federal taxes, do you file as a married person if you are married?
Objections to homosexual acts are part of most major religions. So all religious people are bigots?
Marriage licenses are issued by the States. There is no part of the constitution that delegates that power to the federal government, so by default it falls to the State legislatures.
The feds just use marriage as a tax parameter. they don't have anything else to do with it.
Marriage is not a state issue.
So what federal law defines marriage? And where in the constitution is the federal government given power to regulate marriage licenses?
1. "Well, you would think that the Republican nominee would be able to win an election based on the merits of the ideas."
This would suggest that you are unaware of the bias instilled by the media and the schools.
2. "not enlist a foreign power to help."
The only group associated with a foreign power are the Democrats.
There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/pub...2_say_clintons_should_be_part_of_russia_probe"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™
Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President
Moreso than this world class liar in our WHI found him believable .
You think hilary and bill clinton, the rapist are believable.
Comey verified that Trump hadn't lied.
You should stop doing so.
Are any of them 100% [believable?] Of course not . Someone like that would never be elected .
it was forced on States that didn't want to change their marriage license requirements via judicial action.
And why not? Because they're bigots.
I am actually for SSM, as long as it is passed by the people of the State in question. It is not a Federal right, or a federal matter, except when it comes to requiring States to recognize a valid marriage license from any other State, just like they do now.
How is marriage a state issue and not a federal one? When you file your federal taxes, do you file as a married person if you are married?
Objections to homosexual acts are part of most major religions. So all religious people are bigots?
Marriage licenses are issued by the States. There is no part of the constitution that delegates that power to the federal government, so by default it falls to the State legislatures.
The feds just use marriage as a tax parameter. they don't have anything else to do with it.
Marriage is not a state issue.
So what federal law defines marriage? And where in the constitution is the federal government given power to regulate marriage licenses?
Seems that the supreme court is part of the federal government, it pretty much defined the right to marry and states can't overrule the decision.
What felony? That he let everyojne know Trump was colluding with Russia?
Why are you more upset that people know about the collusion than you are about the actual collusion?
The FBI traditionally says NOTHING about an investigation until it's complete so why should he? In addition while Trump PERSONALLY - was not at the time a target of surveillance (I those were the terms he used) - it does not mean he couldn't be at some point and it does not mean his campaign wasn't.
The man's loyalty is to the country and the FBI, not a party or individual and Trump had no right to make the kinds of demands he made nor attempt to obstruct the investigation.
The FBI director does not traditionally leak private/classified information to the press.
The douche bags loyalty is to the party, not the country.
Comey brings great shame to the FBI.
funny, Trump asked Comey for his loyalty. Comey denied him.
Is that a crime?
did I say it was ?
where ?
