Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.
It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.
That's what they do when you know they have NOTHING to respond with that's legitimate.We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
I've noticed leftists counter the objective with the subjective quite often, and it's generally out of context too.
His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.
It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.
Nonsense.
It’s the role and responsibility of Congress to check the executive, particularly the likes of Trump given his contempt for our democratic institutions, the rule of law, and the Constitution.
This is indeed true with regard to the House, who represents the people and whose members were elected by the people, as opposed to a president who is elected by the states.
And nothing is being ‘nullified’; a majority of the voters opposed Trump becoming president.
Never going to happen. There exist no indictable charges. The fact that Barr would try something like that tells us he is bowing to a King. Constitutional government doesn't work like that.There will be celebrations when Barr indicts McCabe, Comey, Mueller, Obama, and Hillary.
Never going to happen. There exist no indictable charges. The fact that Barr would try something like that tells us he is bowing to a King. Constitutional government doesn't work like that.There will be celebrations when Barr indicts McCabe, Comey, Mueller, Obama, and Hillary.
His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.
It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.
Nonsense.
It’s the role and responsibility of Congress to check the executive, particularly the likes of Trump given his contempt for our democratic institutions, the rule of law, and the Constitution.
This is indeed true with regard to the House, who represents the people and whose members were elected by the people, as opposed to a president who is elected by the states.
And nothing is being ‘nullified’; a majority of the voters opposed Trump becoming president.
IF... the president has done something WRONG. But that's not the case now. The demtrash party has spent since BEFORE Trump was inaugurated SMEARING, SPYING and TRASHING HIM, ABUSING their power, which is going to be TAKEN AWAY next year, BECAUSE that's what they've done.
And his criminal empire. A cultist has spoken everyone. Now move the Sheep herd towards the cliff please.We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.
GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP!
________________________________________________________________
Obummer and Big Mike have left the White House.....they have left the building!
What are the crimes?No, it shows the activist judges let other progressive scum get away with crime.Shows that Trump doesn’t exactly follow the law or Constitution.I watched this already..........and he talked about 20 NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS against Trump from the Lower Courts.............while Obama only had 1 Nationwide Injunction.
Shows how the Judge shopping left go to get their way.
Judicial Activism would be a correct term..........
No, you're the hypocrite for supporting the invasion of these other countries, then blaming the victims for trying to escape the cruelty, murder, and oppression we caused; CIA in South America | Geopolitical MonitorIn your world, if Trump did it yes. I'm also talking about immigration. Obama did one to let them in. You're okay. Trump does one to keep them out. He is a king! In your world. Bad, just bad. Your a hypocrite, and no I didn't spell it wrong.We will have to agree to disagree on thisWe have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.
DACA is a prime example Coyote. That was obummer. Not Trump. obummer multiple times stated, accurately, that he had no power to do anything about them. Then he decided he was above the law and wrote an EO.
Is writing an EO above the law?
His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.
It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.
Nonsense.
It’s the role and responsibility of Congress to check the executive, particularly the likes of Trump given his contempt for our democratic institutions, the rule of law, and the Constitution.
This is indeed true with regard to the House, who represents the people and whose members were elected by the people, as opposed to a president who is elected by the states.
And nothing is being ‘nullified’; a majority of the voters opposed Trump becoming president.
IF... the president has done something WRONG. But that's not the case now. The demtrash party has spent since BEFORE Trump was inaugurated SMEARING, SPYING and TRASHING HIM, ABUSING their power, which is going to be TAKEN AWAY next year, BECAUSE that's what they've done.
What is your evidence Trump has done nothing wrong? We have evidence of Bribery, Extortion, obstruction, corruption, witness intimidation, campaign finance violations, Emoluments violations, charity violations, abuse of power, and probably more. Where is your evidence he is not guilty of these crimes?
We will have to agree to disagree on thisIf you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.
DACA is a prime example Coyote. That was obummer. Not Trump. obummer multiple times stated, accurately, that he had no power to do anything about them. Then he decided he was above the law and wrote an EO.
Is writing an EO above the law?
With what obummer did, yes. It was. He interfered with Congresses immigration duties.
Congress was too busy fighting to get anything done on DACA. They still are. All Obama did was, if you aren't going to come up with an agreement in a timely manner, I'll temporarily do it for you. All Congress had to do was pass their own and the EO would have been null and void. Here it is, how many years later, and they still haven't done a damned thing. The Courts will recognize the EO until the crap in Congress finally hammer out a bill. Of course, Moscow Mitch won't allow it to come to the floor.
/—-/ If Trump thought he was King, you people would have been dealt with by now. We have a great president, now deal with it.We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
This from post#86. How carefully again?We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.
Nothing great about this resume, unless you can counter it with facts?/—-/ If Trump thought he was King, you people would have been dealt with by now. We have a great president, now deal with it.We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.
It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.
Nonsense.
It’s the role and responsibility of Congress to check the executive, particularly the likes of Trump given his contempt for our democratic institutions, the rule of law, and the Constitution.
This is indeed true with regard to the House, who represents the people and whose members were elected by the people, as opposed to a president who is elected by the states.
And nothing is being ‘nullified’; a majority of the voters opposed Trump becoming president.
IF... the president has done something WRONG. But that's not the case now. The demtrash party has spent since BEFORE Trump was inaugurated SMEARING, SPYING and TRASHING HIM, ABUSING their power, which is going to be TAKEN AWAY next year, BECAUSE that's what they've done.
What is your evidence Trump has done nothing wrong? We have evidence of Bribery, Extortion, obstruction, corruption, witness intimidation, campaign finance violations, Emoluments violations, charity violations, abuse of power, and probably more. Where is your evidence he is not guilty of these crimes?
"What is your evidence Trump has done nothing wrong?"
That's Unconstitutional to declare an innocent man as having done "something wrong." And because it is becoming a habit, I hope it hastens the sentences of the real criminals--the leftist lockstep Congressional seatholders who have brought to the public's attention the false scenario that Trump deserves to be impeached for something they don't know about yet except by the most prolific blabbermouths in Congress. Lemme see, Maxine Waters comes to mind because she says more than she thinks.
Bullshit, "activist" judges are always those "other" judges. American courts are nothing but an extension of partisanshithead politics at this juncture.We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.
They certainly annoyed Obama.We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.
Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!
Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.
So if Trump replaces the judges and they stop the next Democrat president liked they have Trump. You will support it?Shows that Trump doesn’t exactly follow the law or Constitution.I watched this already..........and he talked about 20 NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS against Trump from the Lower Courts.............while Obama only had 1 Nationwide Injunction.
Shows how the Judge shopping left go to get their way.
Judicial Activism would be a correct term..........
His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.
It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.
So if Trump replaces the judges and they stop the next Democrat president liked they have Trump. You will support it?Shows that Trump doesn’t exactly follow the law or Constitution.I watched this already..........and he talked about 20 NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS against Trump from the Lower Courts.............while Obama only had 1 Nationwide Injunction.
Shows how the Judge shopping left go to get their way.
Judicial Activism would be a correct term..........
Trump can't replace any judges unless they retire
His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.
It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.
Then that's an impeachable offense. The Attorney General has no such powers. He represents the people, not the President, and has now abused his owers on more than one occasion.
And Trump didin't get 65 million votes. He git 62 million votes
Hillary Clinton got 65 million votes.
