AG Barr goes after Democrats, Activist Judges, and for acting against Executive Branch

[bripat9643]

I watched this already..........and he talked about 20 NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS against Trump from the Lower Courts.............while Obama only had 1 Nationwide Injunction.

Shows how the Judge shopping left go to get their way.

Judicial Activism would be a correct term..........

Shows that Trump doesn’t exactly follow the law or Constitution.

So if Trump replaces the judges and they stop the next Democrat president liked they have Trump. You will support it?

Trump can't replace any judges unless they retire

His speech is very critical of judicial injunctions against the government by the lower courts.

​

It's time to stop tolerating nullification of 65 million American voters by lower courts, he says. It's about time to end judicial intrusions ordered by Democrats who are very jealous of presidential power they did not win.

Then that's an impeachable offense. The Attorney General has no such powers. He represents the people, not the President, and has now abused his owers on more than one occasion.

And Trump didin't get 65 million votes. He git 62 million votes

Hillary Clinton got 65 million votes.

The AG doesn't represent anyone. He's not elected. He does report to the President, however. Trump, whom we elected, is his boss.

 

[toobfreak]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!

Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.

The only problem with your Trump theory is that eventually he gets these actions by lower courts overturned, so while Trump may not be a constitutional scholar, at least his intentions are good and it seems to be more a desire by certain liberal courts to continually block him than any altruistic concern for Life, Liberty and The American People.

 

[bripat9643]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!

Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.

The only problem with your Trump theory is that eventually he gets these actions by lower courts overturned, so while Trump may not be a constitutional scholar, at least his intentions are good and it seems to be more a desire by certain liberal courts to continually block him than any altruistic concern for Life, Liberty and The American People.

Obama proved that there's no great value in a President who's a constitutional scholar if he's an America hating scumbag.

 

[westwall]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

Bullshit, "activist" judges are always those "other" judges. American courts are nothing but an extension of partisanshithead politics at this juncture.

Wow. You really are flailing aren't you. I never even addressed judges, asshat. I was only referring to Trump.

 

[westwall]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

This from post#86. How carefully again?
What is your evidence Trump has done nothing wrong? We have evidence of Bribery, Extortion, obstruction, corruption, witness intimidation, campaign finance violations, Emoluments violations, charity violations, abuse of power, and probably more. Where is your evidence he is not guilty of these crimes?

You do? PRESENT IT! So far all you have presented is peoples opinions.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

Bullshit, "activist" judges are always those "other" judges. American courts are nothing but an extension of partisanshithead politics at this juncture.

Wow. You really are flailing aren't you. I never even addressed judges, asshat. I was only referring to Trump.

There's a thread here, with multiple posters, might want to read through it, cheers.

 

[westwall]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

Bullshit, "activist" judges are always those "other" judges. American courts are nothing but an extension of partisanshithead politics at this juncture.

Wow. You really are flailing aren't you. I never even addressed judges, asshat. I was only referring to Trump.

There's a thread here, with multiple posters, might want to read through it, cheers.

I have. So might you.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!

Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.

The only problem with your Trump theory is that eventually he gets these actions by lower courts overturned, so while Trump may not be a constitutional scholar, at least his intentions are good and it seems to be more a desire by certain liberal courts to continually block him than any altruistic concern for Life, Liberty and The American People.

Obama proved that there's no great value in a President who's a constitutional scholar if he's an America hating scumbag.

And then Don came in and expanded the shit.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

Bullshit, "activist" judges are always those "other" judges. American courts are nothing but an extension of partisanshithead politics at this juncture.

Wow. You really are flailing aren't you. I never even addressed judges, asshat. I was only referring to Trump.

There's a thread here, with multiple posters, might want to read through it, cheers.

I have. So might you.

Then you would not be so triggered? Well you're triggered for nothing again then.


"AG Barr goes after Democrats, Activist Judges, and for acting against Executive Branch"

 

[bripat9643]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!

Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.

The only problem with your Trump theory is that eventually he gets these actions by lower courts overturned, so while Trump may not be a constitutional scholar, at least his intentions are good and it seems to be more a desire by certain liberal courts to continually block him than any altruistic concern for Life, Liberty and The American People.

Obama proved that there's no great value in a President who's a constitutional scholar if he's an America hating scumbag.

And then Don came in and expanded the shit.

Nope. Trump has had the court rule in his favor almost every time.

 

[westwall]

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

Bullshit, "activist" judges are always those "other" judges. American courts are nothing but an extension of partisanshithead politics at this juncture.

Wow. You really are flailing aren't you. I never even addressed judges, asshat. I was only referring to Trump.

There's a thread here, with multiple posters, might want to read through it, cheers.

I have. So might you.

Then you would not be so triggered? Well you're triggered for nothing again then.

I ain't triggered little child. Though it appears you are. I present facts and logical arguments. You present "wah wah wah!"

 

[CWayne]

I watched this already..........and he talked about 20 NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONS against Trump from the Lower Courts.............while Obama only had 1 Nationwide Injunction.

Shows how the Judge shopping left go to get their way.

Judicial Activism would be a correct term..........

Shows that Trump doesn’t exactly follow the law or Constitution.

That is an incorrect interpretation. What would show Trump not following the law would be a number of SCOTUS rulings against him.

This does, however; highlight the need for conservatives to get on O'Connell's backside and Trumps in filling vacant Judicial seats with judges who actually understand the power of the Judiciary as well as the Constitution.

 

[westwall]

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

We will have to agree to disagree on this

DACA is a prime example Coyote. That was obummer. Not Trump. obummer multiple times stated, accurately, that he had no power to do anything about them. Then he decided he was above the law and wrote an EO.

Is writing an EO above the law?

With what obummer did, yes. It was. He interfered with Congresses immigration duties.

Congress was too busy fighting to get anything done on DACA. They still are. All Obama did was, if you aren't going to come up with an agreement in a timely manner, I'll temporarily do it for you. All Congress had to do was pass their own and the EO would have been null and void. Here it is, how many years later, and they still haven't done a damned thing. The Courts will recognize the EO until the crap in Congress finally hammer out a bill. Of course, Moscow Mitch won't allow it to come to the floor.

That doesn't matter one iota. It is CONGRESSES job. And Congress alone to deal with immigration issues. If they weren't getting things done obummer should have been a better negotiator, or a better leader. What he should not have done is what he did which was blatantly illegal and in the long run will harm the DACA kids.

Blame obummer, not Trump. Trump is following the laws of this land. You know, those laws that you once upon a time swore an oath to uphold and defend.

 

[CWayne]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

Bullshit, "activist" judges are always those "other" judges. American courts are nothing but an extension of partisanshithead politics at this juncture.

I have to agree with this. We can see this is the case by the fact of who fights the hardest to ensure that one judge or another sits the bench.

A Constitutional Judge would be a no-brainer for both sides.

 

[toobfreak]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!

Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.

The only problem with your Trump theory is that eventually he gets these actions by lower courts overturned, so while Trump may not be a constitutional scholar, at least his intentions are good and it seems to be more a desire by certain liberal courts to continually block him than any altruistic concern for Life, Liberty and The American People.

Obama proved that there's no great value in a President who's a constitutional scholar if he's an America hating scumbag.

We only have Obumma's word he is a "constitutional scholar." Judging by his supreme court track record, the evidence suggests otherwise, either that or his presidential lapses were very deliberate.

 

[BWK]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

This from post#86. How carefully again?
What is your evidence Trump has done nothing wrong? We have evidence of Bribery, Extortion, obstruction, corruption, witness intimidation, campaign finance violations, Emoluments violations, charity violations, abuse of power, and probably more. Where is your evidence he is not guilty of these crimes?

You do? PRESENT IT! So far all you have presented is peoples opinions.

Sworn testimony is admissible in a hearing. It's viewed as fact, not opinion, susceptible to prosecution if they perjure themselves. The evidence has already been presented in the hearings, the Mueller report, and in court cases. Where the hell have you been?

 

[BWK]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!

Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.

The only problem with your Trump theory is that eventually he gets these actions by lower courts overturned, so while Trump may not be a constitutional scholar, at least his intentions are good and it seems to be more a desire by certain liberal courts to continually block him than any altruistic concern for Life, Liberty and The American People.

Obama proved that there's no great value in a President who's a constitutional scholar if he's an America hating scumbag.

This post is based on nothing.

 

[BWK]

Honestly, Coyote, it is amazing that in every case, you always seem to come to the EXACT WRONG conclusion! You didn't even watch the video at all, did you? The whole point here is that it is the Activist Left who have acted like a King here and not co-equal branches, in trying to block in every way, the President carrying out the policies and agenda to which this nation elected him to do, as if THEY were the true leaders and that somehow Trump was usurping power and authority from THEM!

Considering the courts, comprised of appointees from Bush’s. Clinton, Obama, Trump consistently have problems with his EO’s...he is either ignorant of the Constitution and Law, or he thinks he is above it. Or both. Considering he cozies up to and openly admires autocrats, I suspect the Constitutional restraints on his presidency annoy him.

The only problem with your Trump theory is that eventually he gets these actions by lower courts overturned, so while Trump may not be a constitutional scholar, at least his intentions are good and it seems to be more a desire by certain liberal courts to continually block him than any altruistic concern for Life, Liberty and The American People.

Obama proved that there's no great value in a President who's a constitutional scholar if he's an America hating scumbag.

And then Don came in and expanded the shit.

Nope. Trump has had the court rule in his favor almost every time.

You're a liar too; Trump, All About Winning, Sees Losses in Court Pile Up — ProPublica

 

[westwall]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

This from post#86. How carefully again?
What is your evidence Trump has done nothing wrong? We have evidence of Bribery, Extortion, obstruction, corruption, witness intimidation, campaign finance violations, Emoluments violations, charity violations, abuse of power, and probably more. Where is your evidence he is not guilty of these crimes?

You do? PRESENT IT! So far all you have presented is peoples opinions.

Sworn testimony is admissible in a hearing. It's viewed as fact, not opinion, susceptible to prosecution if they perjure themselves. The evidence has already been presented in the hearings, the Mueller report, and in court cases. Where the hell have you been?

And all of the testimony has been peoples opinions. No evidence at all. Do you not understand the difference between opinion, and fact?

 

[bripat9643]

We have a problem with a president who thinks he is King and there are not three co equal branches.

If you are talking about obummer, I agree with you. Trump has actually been following the laws of this land quite carefully.

This from post#86. How carefully again?
What is your evidence Trump has done nothing wrong? We have evidence of Bribery, Extortion, obstruction, corruption, witness intimidation, campaign finance violations, Emoluments violations, charity violations, abuse of power, and probably more. Where is your evidence he is not guilty of these crimes?

You do? PRESENT IT! So far all you have presented is peoples opinions.

Sworn testimony is admissible in a hearing. It's viewed as fact, not opinion, susceptible to prosecution if they perjure themselves. The evidence has already been presented in the hearings, the Mueller report, and in court cases. Where the hell have you been?

Opinions are not admissible in a court of law, dumbass.