Attacking methodology is the lazy man's way...lol..
The learned community knows that if your methodology sucks, your study sucks. When you use crap methodology, you are generally being dishonest in your approach. Your little article is cute, but completely beside the point, and nothing but a justification of crap *studies* that present falsehoods as reality...and children are the ones who suffer.
The only time an article, link, or review isn't false if it agrees with your view point. The problem is, you have to post blogs by A Mormon who spent his career trying conversion therapy on homosexuals. Your methodology sucks. Most can see it, sorry you and Vox are ignorant loons, and cannot.
You problem KG, is you became educated on false material. Just imagine what you could have been if you actually opened up your mind to information that wasn't based in lunacy? You are smart, but only to a point. You could go a lot farther if you got over being a bigot.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's an opinion piece, ditz. My studies blew the retards out of the water, and that's all they have left.
Sure they did.
An Opinion piece is probably better than any propaganda "study" you post where they completely controlled the outcome.
Of course you are too biased to realize that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited: