Albert Einstein: Why Socialism?

The U.S. didn't suffer through a recession?

I guess it was just that liberal media lying to us again.



Detroit has been decaying for years you laughable self-deceiving idiot

has nothing to do with the last recession that affected all of America

the best part is you're being serious! lol

For years you say?

So we had socialism happening in this country before Obama was president?

When did it start? During Bush? Reagan?

Let's see you back pedal now, turnip.

Carter you dolt!


lol
 
I believe Einstein also said doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity that would seem to be a pretty accurate take on socialism given the number of countries who have tried it and failed with it.

And yet the most successful and prosperous countries today all have many more elements of socialism than we do here in the U.S. Why is that?

What countries would those be?
 
The U.S. didn't suffer through a recession?

I guess it was just that liberal media lying to us again.



Detroit has been decaying for years you laughable self-deceiving idiot

has nothing to do with the last recession that affected all of America

the best part is you're being serious! lol

For years you say?

So we had socialism happening in this country before Obama was president?

When did it start? During Bush? Reagan?

Let's see you back pedal now, turnip.


why would i backpedel you moronic dolt?

left-wing politics at ALL levels; from the corrupt City of Detroit government; to Big Labor; led to the filight of people and jobs from Detroit

you can pretend it isnt so; it's not my business to rescue an arrogant lib moron from his own ignorance
 
Albert Einstein is the world-famous physicist. This article was originally published in the first issue of Monthly Review (May 1949). It was subsequently published in May 1998 to commemorate the first issue of MR‘s fiftieth year.
—The Editors

"Is it advisable for one who is not an expert on economic and social issues to express views on the subject of socialism? I believe for a number of reasons that it is."

Why Socialism?

"The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor—not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules. In this respect, it is important to realize that the means of production—that is to say, the entire productive capacity that is needed for producing consumer goods as well as additional capital goods—may legally be, and for the most part are, the private property of individuals."

:cuckoo: The socialist country that he ran away from would've put him in the ovens.
 
Detroit has been decaying for years you laughable self-deceiving idiot

has nothing to do with the last recession that affected all of America

the best part is you're being serious! lol

For years you say?

So we had socialism happening in this country before Obama was president?

When did it start? During Bush? Reagan?

Let's see you back pedal now, turnip.

Carter you dolt!


lol

Why even bother responding? You know full well you're just talking directly out of your ass at this point. You're just making it worse every time you feel the need to hit the reply button.
 
I believe Einstein also said doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity that would seem to be a pretty accurate take on socialism given the number of countries who have tried it and failed with it.

And yet the most successful and prosperous countries today all have many more elements of socialism than we do here in the U.S. Why is that?

What countries would those be?

I'll be happy to name some countries which you will nitpick and find something wrong with. Right? Is that the route you want to go?

Or I can let you tell me which countries you consider to be the most successful/prosperous right now and then we can go from there.

Your choice. (even though I know which option you'll be selecting already)
 
Albert Einstein is the world-famous physicist. This article was originally published in the first issue of Monthly Review (May 1949). It was subsequently published in May 1998 to commemorate the first issue of MR‘s fiftieth year.
—The Editors

"Is it advisable for one who is not an expert on economic and social issues to express views on the subject of socialism? I believe for a number of reasons that it is."

Why Socialism?

"The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor—not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules. In this respect, it is important to realize that the means of production—that is to say, the entire productive capacity that is needed for producing consumer goods as well as additional capital goods—may legally be, and for the most part are, the private property of individuals."


As an economist, Einstein made a great physicist.
 
For years you say?

So we had socialism happening in this country before Obama was president?

When did it start? During Bush? Reagan?

Let's see you back pedal now, turnip.

Carter you dolt!


lol

Why even bother responding? You know full well you're just talking directly out of your ass at this point. You're just making it worse every time you feel the need to hit the reply button.

awwwww look at it cry!!!


lol what a miserable loser you are!
i already explained my self in the post after the one you're mentioning here



left-wing ideology associated with decades of Dem Party rule led to the loss of population and jobs from Detroit

those are facts; the only one talking out of his ass is you
 
Carter you dolt!


lol

Why even bother responding? You know full well you're just talking directly out of your ass at this point. You're just making it worse every time you feel the need to hit the reply button.

awwwww look at it cry!!!


lol what a miserable loser you are!
i already explained my self in the post after the one you're mentioning here



left-wing ideology associated with decades of Dem Party rule led to the loss of population and jobs from Detroit

those are facts; the only one talking out of his ass is you

Once again, left wing policy does not equal socialism. You're only reinforcing my point further with each post you make. You clearly don't understand the difference. But we both knew that already.
 
And yet the most successful and prosperous countries today all have many more elements of socialism than we do here in the U.S. Why is that?

What countries would those be?

I'll be happy to name some countries which you will nitpick and find something wrong with. Right? Is that the route you want to go?

Or I can let you tell me which countries you consider to be the most successful/prosperous right now and then we can go from there.

Your choice. (even though I know which option you'll be selecting already)

GDP per Capita in terms of Purchasing Power Parity

Rank Country GDP

1 Qatar 98,814
2 Luxembourg 78,670
3 Singapore 64,584
4 Norway 54,947
5 Brunei 53,431
6 United States 53,101
— Hong Kong 52,722
7 Switzerland 46,430
8 San Marino[6][7] 44,480
9 Canada 43,472
10 Australia 43,073
11 Austria 42,597
12 Netherlands 41,711
13 Sweden 41,188
14 Iceland 41,000
15 Germany 40,007
16 Taiwan 39,767
17 Kuwait 39,706
18 Ireland 39,547
19 Denmark 37,900
20 Belgium 37,881
21 United Kingdom 37,307
22 Japan 36,899
 
Why even bother responding? You know full well you're just talking directly out of your ass at this point. You're just making it worse every time you feel the need to hit the reply button.

awwwww look at it cry!!!


lol what a miserable loser you are!
i already explained my self in the post after the one you're mentioning here



left-wing ideology associated with decades of Dem Party rule led to the loss of population and jobs from Detroit

those are facts; the only one talking out of his ass is you

Once again, left wing policy does not equal socialism. You're only reinforcing my point further with each post you make. You clearly don't understand the difference. But we both knew that already.

Yes they do.
 
What countries would those be?

I'll be happy to name some countries which you will nitpick and find something wrong with. Right? Is that the route you want to go?

Or I can let you tell me which countries you consider to be the most successful/prosperous right now and then we can go from there.

Your choice. (even though I know which option you'll be selecting already)

GDP per Capita in terms of Purchasing Power Parity

Rank Country GDP

1 Qatar 98,814
2 Luxembourg 78,670
3 Singapore 64,584
4 Norway 54,947
5 Brunei 53,431
6 United States 53,101
— Hong Kong 52,722
7 Switzerland 46,430
8 San Marino[6][7] 44,480
9 Canada 43,472
10 Australia 43,073
11 Austria 42,597
12 Netherlands 41,711
13 Sweden 41,188
14 Iceland 41,000
15 Germany 40,007
16 Taiwan 39,767
17 Kuwait 39,706
18 Ireland 39,547
19 Denmark 37,900
20 Belgium 37,881
21 United Kingdom 37,307
22 Japan 36,899

I see lots of "socialism" on that list. Which country do you want to look at?
 
Why even bother responding? You know full well you're just talking directly out of your ass at this point. You're just making it worse every time you feel the need to hit the reply button.

awwwww look at it cry!!!


lol what a miserable loser you are!
i already explained my self in the post after the one you're mentioning here



left-wing ideology associated with decades of Dem Party rule led to the loss of population and jobs from Detroit

those are facts; the only one talking out of his ass is you

Once again, left wing policy does not equal socialism. You're only reinforcing my point further with each post you make. You clearly don't understand the difference. But we both knew that already.

good one stupid; you want to deny socialism lies on the Left politically?
good the your whole list of countires you are holding as shining examples isnt what you're claiming it is?

and how stupid do you have to be to equate what others are able to do in their countries with what people do in another?

AMERICAN liberals, socialsits, people on the Left; have failed the country miserably
 
I'll be happy to name some countries which you will nitpick and find something wrong with. Right? Is that the route you want to go?

Or I can let you tell me which countries you consider to be the most successful/prosperous right now and then we can go from there.

Your choice. (even though I know which option you'll be selecting already)

GDP per Capita in terms of Purchasing Power Parity

Rank Country GDP

1 Qatar 98,814
2 Luxembourg 78,670
3 Singapore 64,584
4 Norway 54,947
5 Brunei 53,431
6 United States 53,101
— Hong Kong 52,722
7 Switzerland 46,430
8 San Marino[6][7] 44,480
9 Canada 43,472
10 Australia 43,073
11 Austria 42,597
12 Netherlands 41,711
13 Sweden 41,188
14 Iceland 41,000
15 Germany 40,007
16 Taiwan 39,767
17 Kuwait 39,706
18 Ireland 39,547
19 Denmark 37,900
20 Belgium 37,881
21 United Kingdom 37,307
22 Japan 36,899

I see lots of "socialism" on that list. Which country do you want to look at?

The less socialism they have, the better they do.

Heritage Index of Economic Freedom

rank country overall change

1 Hong Kong 90.1 +0.8
2 Singapore 89.4 +1.4
3 Australia 82.0 -0.6
4 Switzerland 81.6 +0.6
5 New Zealand 81.2 -0.2
6 Canada 80.2 +0.8
7 Chile 78.7 -0.3
8 Mauritius 76.5 -0.4
9 Ireland 76.2 +0.5
10 Denmark 76.1 0.0
11 Estonia 75.9 +0.6
12 United States 75.5 -0.5
13 Bahrain 75.1 -0.4
14 United Kingdom 74.9 +0.1
15 The Netherlands 74.2 +0.7
16 Luxembourg 74.2 0.0
17 Taiwan 73.9 +1.2
18 Germany 73.4 +0.6
19 Finland 73.4 -0.6
20 Sweden 73.1 +0.2
21 Lithuania 73.0 +0.9
22 Georgia 72.6 +0.4
23 Iceland 72.4 +0.3
24 Austria 72.4 +0.6
25 Japan 72.4 +0.6
26 Czech Republic 72.2 +1.3
27 Botswana 72.0 +1.4
28 United Arab Emirates 71.4 +0.3
29 Macau 71.3 -0.4
30 Qatar 71.2 -0.1
31 South Korea 71.2 +0.9
32 Norway 70.9 +0.4
33 Saint Lucia 70.7 +0.3

The higher the rank, the less socialism.
 
awwwww look at it cry!!!


lol what a miserable loser you are!
i already explained my self in the post after the one you're mentioning here



left-wing ideology associated with decades of Dem Party rule led to the loss of population and jobs from Detroit

those are facts; the only one talking out of his ass is you

Once again, left wing policy does not equal socialism. You're only reinforcing my point further with each post you make. You clearly don't understand the difference. But we both knew that already.

good one stupid; you want to deny socialism lies on the Left politically?
good the your whole list of countires you are holding as shining examples isnt what you're claiming it is?

and how stupid do you have to be to equate what others are able to do in their countries with what people do in another?

AMERICAN liberals, socialsits, people on the Left; have failed the country miserably

What did we talk about? English only please.

And you are the perfect example of government waste. You are getting a tax payer funded paycheck every week and are too lazy to use spell checker for your rants about your own employer. Do you care that you're a raging hypocrite? Of course not.

Barack says break time is over, get back to "work".
 
Albert Einstein is the world-famous physicist. This article was originally published in the first issue of Monthly Review (May 1949). It was subsequently published in May 1998 to commemorate the first issue of MR‘s fiftieth year.
—The Editors

"Is it advisable for one who is not an expert on economic and social issues to express views on the subject of socialism? I believe for a number of reasons that it is."

Why Socialism?

"The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. We see before us a huge community of producers the members of which are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor—not by force, but on the whole in faithful compliance with legally established rules. In this respect, it is important to realize that the means of production—that is to say, the entire productive capacity that is needed for producing consumer goods as well as additional capital goods—may legally be, and for the most part are, the private property of individuals."

Are you a Jew hating fucktwat that thinks they try to undermine society? Yet you quote Einstein, I though antisemitic fucktwats like you live by the theory that Einstein plagiarized and stole his work from some good NAZI scientist? Can't you stay consistent scumbag. But I digress.

Anyways, Einstein was a great scientist that doesn't mean he would be a great economist! Maybe great minds were (are) duped by the crafted used car sales pushing cradle to the grave government oversight. He penned this in 1949, the USSR was in it's infancy stage. USSR (and North Korea vs South Korea also) was the picture perfect controlled experiment we needed on socialism. See they had nearly complete socialism under the communist rule. We had capitalism under the democratic rule. We both became super-powers. One of us became the greatest economy the world has ever seen and one collapse within the same century of it's inception.

Socialism has been proven as a failed policy - Examples: USSR, North Korea vs South Korea, Cambodia, Cuba, Venezuela and YES China (China didn't start becoming the powerhouse they are today until they opened up to private enterprise, private property, foreign investment and YES capitalism)!

Hey goyim trash boy, I am Jewish, I posted a piece from fellow Jew Albert Einstein. Sorry that your goyim "brain" cannot process information and that's your problem not mine you fakakta dreck goyim
 
GDP per Capita in terms of Purchasing Power Parity

Rank Country GDP

1 Qatar 98,814
2 Luxembourg 78,670
3 Singapore 64,584
4 Norway 54,947
5 Brunei 53,431
6 United States 53,101
— Hong Kong 52,722
7 Switzerland 46,430
8 San Marino[6][7] 44,480
9 Canada 43,472
10 Australia 43,073
11 Austria 42,597
12 Netherlands 41,711
13 Sweden 41,188
14 Iceland 41,000
15 Germany 40,007
16 Taiwan 39,767
17 Kuwait 39,706
18 Ireland 39,547
19 Denmark 37,900
20 Belgium 37,881
21 United Kingdom 37,307
22 Japan 36,899

I see lots of "socialism" on that list. Which country do you want to look at?

The less socialism they have, the better they do.

Heritage Index of Economic Freedom

rank country overall change

1 Hong Kong 90.1 +0.8
2 Singapore 89.4 +1.4
3 Australia 82.0 -0.6
4 Switzerland 81.6 +0.6
5 New Zealand 81.2 -0.2
6 Canada 80.2 +0.8
7 Chile 78.7 -0.3
8 Mauritius 76.5 -0.4
9 Ireland 76.2 +0.5
10 Denmark 76.1 0.0
11 Estonia 75.9 +0.6
12 United States 75.5 -0.5
13 Bahrain 75.1 -0.4
14 United Kingdom 74.9 +0.1
15 The Netherlands 74.2 +0.7
16 Luxembourg 74.2 0.0
17 Taiwan 73.9 +1.2
18 Germany 73.4 +0.6
19 Finland 73.4 -0.6
20 Sweden 73.1 +0.2
21 Lithuania 73.0 +0.9
22 Georgia 72.6 +0.4
23 Iceland 72.4 +0.3
24 Austria 72.4 +0.6
25 Japan 72.4 +0.6
26 Czech Republic 72.2 +1.3
27 Botswana 72.0 +1.4
28 United Arab Emirates 71.4 +0.3
29 Macau 71.3 -0.4
30 Qatar 71.2 -0.1
31 South Korea 71.2 +0.9
32 Norway 70.9 +0.4
33 Saint Lucia 70.7 +0.3

The higher the rank, the less socialism.

The higher the rank, the less the socialism? Really? LOL. Now you've painted yourself in to a fun corner. Can't wait to watch the contortionist act you use to try and get out of this one.

Ok. So Canada, Australia and Denmark are less Socialist than the U.S.?

Which policies would you adopt from those less socialist countries that in your opinion are better than our more socialist policies we have here.

This should be good for a laugh.
 
Last edited:
YAWN
good one idiot; einstein probably couldnt tie his shoes; no common sense

more proof big-brained melon-head leftists use ignorant losers like you as useful dupes
It doesn't take someone with Einstein's exceptional reasoning ability to understand how the excessive accumulation of a nation's wealth resource will inevitably upset its economic balance and result in all sorts of social and political problems. Yet there is no shortage of those who probably don't have a pot to piss in but who hasten to present empty, nonsensical arguments and hurl insults at those who criticize the effects of inequitable distribution of a nation's wealth.

The only possible reason for taking such an illogical position is the pathology of greed -- which affects even those who have little more than their gluttonous dreams of acquiring excess wealth.
 

Forum List

Back
Top