- Apr 21, 2010
- 99,307
- 60,647
Ahhhh, look at the fascist ignoring the violations of law by his peeps.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahhhh, look at the fascist ignoring the violations of law by his peeps.
Ahhhh, look at the fascist ignoring the violations of law by his peeps.
It had plausibility to create chaos and a constitutional crises which according to the US Constitution would force it to be settled in the US House of Representatives who held a one vote majority able to decide Trump/Pence the chaos ending winner .This The fact that it had zero plausibility of working
Yes there was a written plan, It’s author has beeni Indicted at least twice@Oldestyle wrote: Oh, now there is a "written plan" to destroy democracy, NotFooled? You of course have SEEN this plan...right? (eye roll) 21OCT25-POST#316
Eastman Coup PlanSo Pence says, fine. Pursuant to the 12th Amendment, no candidate has achieved the necessary majority. That sends the matter to the House, where the “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote . . . .
Eastman Coup PlanRepublicans currently control 26 of the state delegations, the bare majority needed to win that vote. President Trump is re-elected there as well.
Eastman Coup Planwe should not allow the Electoral Count Act constraint on debate to control. That would mean that a prior legislature was determining the rules of the present one — a constitutional no-no (as Tribe has forcefully argued).
Eastman Coup PlanI. So someone – Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, etc. – should demand normal rules (which includes the filibuster). That creates a stalemate that would give the state legislatures more time to weigh in to formally support the alternate slate of electors, if they had not already done so.
But PENCE WAS A COWARD AFTER THE DISRUPTION of the riot was over AND STUCK WITH THE PROCESS >>>}
If Pence does the right thing we win.Trump publicly admits in his speech that his intent on J6 was to use uncertified Republican certificates of electors to prevent Biden from being inaugurated and he planned on winning an election that he lost.
How is that not systemic racism if Pence sends nine out of ten black votes back to the states to not be counted which makes Trump the winner?
Systemic racism is legalAbsolutely legal.
Systemic racism is legalNot illegal. It is how an election is challenged. If there was no fraud this would not be happening.
“All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people.” 21JAN06-DJT-jEASTMAN
Here is the plan: Trump conspired with dozens so he could as he claimed “win” the 2020 election o J6 if Pence had the courage to do the right thing
See NFBW Oct 25, 2021 Post #319 in “Liz Cheney says Trump appears to have been ‘personally involved in planning’ 6 Jan insurrection”. Thread!!!!!!
3. At the end, he announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States, there are no electors that can be deemed validly appointed in those States.
{You don’t think this would be a disruption Correll >>>} Pence then gavels President Trump as re-elected there as well
Trump took the Eastman Plan and put it into action so that he could tell the mob on J6 that if they go to the Capitol and fight like hell and if Mike Pence finds his MAGA balls then MAGA wins the 2020 election and Joe Biden will not be inaugurated ever .
The Eastman Plan
Pence says, fine. Pursuant to the 12th Amendment, no candidate has achieved the necessary majority. That sends the matter to the House, where the “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote
. . .” Republicans currently control 26 of the state delegations, the bare majority needed to win that vote. President Trump is re-elected there as well.
Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, etc. – should demand normal rules (which includes the filibuster). That creates a stalemate that would give the state legislatures more time to weigh in to formally support the alternate slate of electors, if they had not already done so.
The main thing here is that Pence should do this without asking for permission
Trump lied on J6 that those seven states wanted their certificates back which was also part of the fraudulent attempt to convince Pence not to count those seven stars and declare Trump/Pence the winner
Here is the plan: Trump conspired with dozens so he could as he claimed “win” the 2020 election o J6 if Pence had the courage to do the right thing
Keep on keeping on, little fascist.
Imbecile, only one gets certified for Congress depending on which candidate wins the state. Never are two certified slates sent to Congress.
It has nothing to do with who's in charge, shvantz. The popular vote in every state determines which slate of electors will be certified by the state to be counted by Congress. Not one single state among those 7 swing states certified Trump electors. Hence, they're fake.
The Arizona Republicans did in fact send their fraudulent certifications to Mike Pence. However, Mike Pence was too God-fearing and law abiding and constitution respecting to recognize them, in the way that DJT and the MAGA mob wanted him to.And 2 certified slates weren't sent in 2020 either.
All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people.” 21JAN06-DJT-jEASTMAN
The Arizona Republicans did in fact send their fraudulent certifications to Mike Pence. However, Mike Pence was too God-fearing and law abiding and constitution respecting to recognize them, in the way that DJT and the MAGA mob wanted him to.
You have not contested the above Trump lie Saint Oldstyle that seven Biden states asked for their slate of electors back so they could officially flip the election to Trump.
They were fraudulent certifications that were not authenticated according to election law.They weren't certified, period.
And 2 certified slates weren't sent in 2020 either.
Your 'rebuttal' had nothing to do with my post.
They weren't certified, period.
fort SumnerMore Fascist prosecutors from the left attacking the other side.
Great people like Hitler and Mussilini did this same shit.
Maybe we need to just throw Dems in prison too in Red States.
Given our new standards set by you dirtbags
how so, explain it? Is this your turrets again?Which is what makes them fraudulent. How are you not getting that?
The US Justice department failed voters big time when they did not pick up the fact that Donald Trump announced what the criminal intent for the January 6 counting of the electors joint session of Congress decertify the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next.All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify and we become president and you are the happiest people.” 21JAN06-DJT-jEASTMAN
grand juries are illegitimate.Spoken like a one-eyed Jack-off. File your brief, regarding your legalistic objections to the actions of the Grand Jury. Whining here will do you no good. If you move fast, maybe you can get the brief in the last edition of the Pundit, as it is declaring bankruptcy, after being sued over its many lies.
Really? What country is that?grand juries are illegitimate.
; both certificates are then sent to Congress to be opened and counted.
In 1887, Congress passed the Electoral Count Act, now codified in Title 3, Chapter 1 of the United States Code, establishing specific procedures for the counting of the electoral votes. The law was passed in response to the disputed 1876 presidential election, in which several states submitted competing slates of electors. Among its provisions, the law established deadlines that the states must meet when selecting their electors, resolving disputes, and when they must cast their electoral votes.[23both certificates are then sent to Congress to be opened and counted.
That happens when a state allows splitting of electors instead of winner take all. That is not the case in Arizona or any of the other fake Republican Elector “winner take all“ states.
In 1887, Congress passed the Electoral Count Act, now codified in Title 3, Chapter 1 of the United States Code, establishing specific procedures for the counting of the electoral votes. The law was passed in response to the disputed 1876 presidential election, in which several states submitted competing slates of electors. Among its provisions, the law established deadlines that the states must meet when selecting their electors, resolving disputes, and when they must cast their electoral votes.[23The US Justice department failed voters big time when they did not pick up the fact that Donald Trump announced what the criminal intent for the January 6 counting of the electors
IF All Vice President Pence had to do was send it back to the states to recertify and So that Trump becomes president and MAGA are the happiest people.
There was no due process going on in any of the states where Trump could legally have a path to winning the 2020 election.
The DOJ investigation in Trump could’ve begun just on the basis of that one statement needed to find was the Eastman memo to know what he meant