All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[rosends]

this is true. Does this mean that the approach should be to eliminate any country which is created by military conquest? Or to justify military conquest as a valid method nation-creating? If we want to roll back to "pre-conquest" days, who would then set the laws? The only valid control would be based in aboriginal existence? Or is there a "start date"?

 

[Lisa558]

this is true. Does this mean that the approach should be to eliminate any country which is created by military conquest? Or to justify military conquest as a valid method nation-creating? If we want to roll back to "pre-conquest" days, who would then set the laws? The only valid control would be based in aboriginal existence? Or is there a "start date"?

No, he just means the Jewish country.

 

[rosends]

No, he just means the Jewish country.

oh. That seems rather selective and intellectually dishonest.

 

[Billo_Really]

this is true. Does this mean that the approach should be to eliminate any country which is created by military conquest? Or to justify military conquest as a valid method nation-creating? If we want to roll back to "pre-conquest" days, who would then set the laws? The only valid control would be based in aboriginal existence? Or is there a "start date"?

Israel cannot hold onto land it seized in the '67 war. Conquer by conquest has been outlawed since the end of WWII. To allow Israel to keep that land, is like saying it was okay for Germany to annex Poland.

 

[Lisa558]

oh. That seems rather selective and intellectually dishonest.

That’s how you can tell it’s driven by antisemitism. Why else apply targeted condemnation to just ONE country?

 

[rosends]

Israel cannot hold onto land it seized in the '67 war. Conquer by conquest has been outlawed since the end of WWII. To allow Israel to keep that land, is like saying it was okay for Germany to annex Poland.

I believe land conquered in a defensive war was not outlawed. In 1967 Israel acted in defense of its people and its rights.

Myths & Facts The 1956 Suez War and the 1967 Six-Day War

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

what did Poland do to Germany that made Germany's actions defensive?

 

[Lisa558]

Israel cannot hold onto land it seized in the '67 war. Conquer by conquest has been outlawed since the end of WWII. To allow Israel to keep that land, is like saying it was okay for Germany to annex Poland.

They offered to give land back to the so-called PalestinIans, but the HAMAS terrorists they elected as leaders rejected it.

 

[Lisa558]

I believe land conquered in a defensive war was not outlawed. In 1967 Israel acted in defense of its people and its rights.

Myths & Facts The 1956 Suez War and the 1967 Six-Day War

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

what did Poland do to Germany that made Germany's actions defensive?

Yeah, they keep forgetting that part. Israel didn’t march into Jordan unprovoked and seize the land. They were ATTACKED.

 

[Billo_Really]

I believe land conquered in a defensive war was not outlawed. In 1967 Israel acted in defense of its people and its rights.

Myths & Facts The 1956 Suez War and the 1967 Six-Day War

Encyclopedia of Jewish and Israeli history, politics and culture, with biographies, statistics, articles and documents on topics from anti-Semitism to Zionism.

www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org

what did Poland do to Germany that made Germany's actions defensive?

It was not defensive! The war started when Israeli tanks rolled into Egypt.

 

[rosends]

It was not defensive! The war started when Israeli tanks rolled into Egypt.

actually, it was. There were attacks against Israel, threats, and the closing of the Straits of Tiran. This is old news.

 

[Billo_Really]

They offered to give land back to the so-called PalestinIans, but the HAMAS terrorists they elected as leaders rejected it.

You can't give what you don't have and that land is not Israel's and it never will be Israel's.

 

[Billo_Really]

actually, it was. There were attacks against Israel, threats, and the closing of the Straits of Tiran. This is old news.

What attacks?

 

[P F Tinmore]

this is true. Does this mean that the approach should be to eliminate any country which is created by military conquest? Or to justify military conquest as a valid method nation-creating? If we want to roll back to "pre-conquest" days, who would then set the laws? The only valid control would be based in aboriginal existence? Or is there a "start date"?

In the old days conquest was considered a legitimate means of acquiring territory. Since the advent of international law it has become illegal. In the US, Canada, etc. it was not illegal. For Israel it was illegal.

BTW, conquerors cannot be considered native or indigenous.