All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Down in the Jordan Valley, the Cruel Wheels of the Israeli Occupation Keep on Turning
Shortly after Netanyahu announced his plan to annex the Jordan Valley, the Israeli authorities arrived at hilltop olive groves owned by Palestinians there, and destroyed them, days before the planned harvest

1.7867119.4022534588.jpg


The goal was singularly vicious: the uprooting of hundreds of olive trees that were about to yield their first fruit, and demolition of the cisterns holding the water that was used to irrigate them.

Down in the Jordan Valley, the cruel wheels of the Israeli occupation keep on turning
 
Adei Ad settlers bulldoze Palestinian-owned land north of Ramallah

1729961524.jpg


RAMALLAH, (PIC)
+
-

Jewish settlers from the illegal settlement of Adei Ad bulldozed on Sunday a vast tract of Palestinian-owned agricultural land in Turmus Ayya town, north of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank.

Turmus Ayya mayor Rifaat Lavi said that Adei Ad settlers embarked on bulldozing about six dunums of agricultural land belonging to the family of Abu Kafya.

This was the fourth time in two months the same settlers had carried out bulldozing activities in the town, mayor Lavi pointed out, adding that such practices take place under military protection.

Read more at
Adei Ad settlers bulldoze Palestinian-owned land north of Ramallah
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center
 
Adei Ad settlers bulldoze Palestinian-owned land north of Ramallah

1729961524.jpg


RAMALLAH, (PIC)
+
-

Jewish settlers from the illegal settlement of Adei Ad bulldozed on Sunday a vast tract of Palestinian-owned agricultural land in Turmus Ayya town, north of Ramallah in the occupied West Bank.

Turmus Ayya mayor Rifaat Lavi said that Adei Ad settlers embarked on bulldozing about six dunums of agricultural land belonging to the family of Abu Kafya.

This was the fourth time in two months the same settlers had carried out bulldozing activities in the town, mayor Lavi pointed out, adding that such practices take place under military protection.

Read more at
Adei Ad settlers bulldoze Palestinian-owned land north of Ramallah
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

A function of the islamic settler colonial project.
 
Down in the Jordan Valley, the Cruel Wheels of the Israeli Occupation Keep on Turning
Shortly after Netanyahu announced his plan to annex the Jordan Valley, the Israeli authorities arrived at hilltop olive groves owned by Palestinians there, and destroyed them, days before the planned harvest

1.7867119.4022534588.jpg


The goal was singularly vicious: the uprooting of hundreds of olive trees that were about to yield their first fruit, and demolition of the cisterns holding the water that was used to irrigate them.

Down in the Jordan Valley, the cruel wheels of the Israeli occupation keep on turning

Lots of land in Syria where the Pallies can plant.
 
Down in the Jordan Valley, the Cruel Wheels of the Israeli Occupation Keep on Turning
Shortly after Netanyahu announced his plan to annex the Jordan Valley, the Israeli authorities arrived at hilltop olive groves owned by Palestinians there, and destroyed them, days before the planned harvest

1.7867119.4022534588.jpg


The goal was singularly vicious: the uprooting of hundreds of olive trees that were about to yield their first fruit, and demolition of the cisterns holding the water that was used to irrigate them.

Down in the Jordan Valley, the cruel wheels of the Israeli occupation keep on turning



.....do you think they may have been looking underneath the rooted-up olive trees for terrorist tunnels ?





so......(like the brrrrrchinesebrrrrrrrrrr do here on american soil) - they just took it upon themselves and...."walked" right onto their property unannounced....and started bulldozing grandpa ABU's olive trees ?

that sucks.....no, i don't believe it...... another link please?
 
Israelis hold the most negative view of the United Nations of any nationality in the world, a new poll has revealed.

The survey — conducted by the Pew Research Center — found that 65 percent of Israelis look at the UN unfavorably, with only 31 percent having a favorable outlook toward the global intergovernmental body.

Israel has long considered the UN the be hopelessly prejudiced against it, due to the dominance of the “Muslim bloc” of countries that use its institutions to batter the Jewish state politically.

In another notable finding, the poll revealed that views of the UN in the United States were sharply divided along partisan lines.

According to the results, 77 percent of Democrats held a favorable view of the UN, while only 36 percent of Republicans felt the same. Overall, 59 percent of Americans held a positive opinion of the UN.

On a global scale, the UN is popular, with 61 percent of people in the 32 countries surveyed viewing it UN favorably.

Poll: Israelis View UN More Unfavorably Than Any Other Nationality Surveyed
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al

OK, Thomas Friedman has been awarded multiple Pulitzer Prizes, I think in this case he has it wrong, yet tells the truth.


An argument form is valid if and only if whenever the premises are all true, then conclusion is true.

In this case, he opens with three basic premises. They are half-truths, and do not lead to a true conclusion.

Thomas Friedman Brilliantly Explains Why Ilhan's Israel Comments Are Fundamentally True
(COMMENT)

First, FREIDMAN says that the Supreme Court says "unlimited Campaign donations. And then makes up the scenario that Candidate "A" {with the pro-Israel lobby [The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) approval]} run against Candidate "B" (with NO AIPAC support) then Candidate "A" makes three (3) phone calls and can get all the money needed to defeat Candidate "B."

◈ Now this can be true (but not necessarily true), but lets make the assumption that FREIDMAN is correct (benefit of the doubt).
◈ This complaint is about organizational funding capacity. Nearly every politician is concerned with campaign finance. And the campaign finance rules are the same for every candidate. Nothing prevents Candidate "B" from building a similar finance capacity as Candidate "B."
◈ The complaint is frivoulus. It is a child complaint of "NO FAIR" because the other guy can run faster and jump higher - and therefore wins.
Now we are talking about the political pull on the spectrum of politics. FREIDMAN complains that the is something wrong with the pro-Israel elements pulling to the "right" political contest to the "Right." What do we mean by "Right-Wing?" We are talking about "conservatives." As if being "conservative" is somehow "bad." The unspoken truth here is that the complaint is saying that given all the support and influences on the Liberal Left, FRIEDMAN sees the pro-Israeli conservatives more likely to achieve victory at the polls.

Ideological Placement of Source's Audience.png

Even with the al-Jazeera (America) on the far "Liberal Left" accompanied by CNN, the Daily Show and that formidable personality - Stephen Colbert, FREIDMAN is concerned that the statecraft of the "Conservative Right" has some sort of unfair advantage. (Go figure.)

Finally, the complaint is that a member of the State Department cannot say that the "West Bank Area "A" Settlements" are an impediment to peace. NEWS FLASH: Not once has the Arab Palestinians called for an Armistice and availed itself to the Dispute Resolution Processes. And what is more invalid is the fact that the Arab Palestinians do not want to negotiate. It is the Arab Palestinian Policy that: "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine. This is the overall strategy, not merely a tactical phase." Is that not the greater impediment to peace; and did it not come before the establishment of settlement?

It is a great little video peace. It is not worth the bandwidth it takes to publish the Title.

........•  Smaller then Smallest.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al

OK, Thomas Friedman has been awarded multiple Pulitzer Prizes, I think in this case he has it wrong, yet tells the truth.


An argument form is valid if and only if whenever the premises are all true, then conclusion is true.

In this case, he opens with three basic premises. They are half-truths, and do not lead to a true conclusion.

Thomas Friedman Brilliantly Explains Why Ilhan's Israel Comments Are Fundamentally True
(COMMENT)

First, FREIDMAN says that the Supreme Court says "unlimited Campaign donations. And then makes up the scenario that Candidate "A" {with the pro-Israel lobby [The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) approval]} run against Candidate "B" (with NO AIPAC support) then Candidate "A" makes three (3) phone calls and can get all the money needed to defeat Candidate "B."

◈ Now this can be true (but not necessarily true), but lets make the assumption that FREIDMAN is correct (benefit of the doubt).
◈ This complaint is about organizational funding capacity. Nearly every politician is concerned with campaign finance. And the campaign finance rules are the same for every candidate. Nothing prevents Candidate "B" from building a similar finance capacity as Candidate "B."
◈ The complaint is frivoulus. It is a child complaint of "NO FAIR" because the other guy can run faster and jump higher - and therefore wins.
Now we are talking about the political pull on the spectrum of politics. FREIDMAN complains that the is something wrong with the pro-Israel elements pulling to the "right" political contest to the "Right." What do we mean by "Right-Wing?" We are talking about "conservatives." As if being "conservative" is somehow "bad." The unspoken truth here is that the complaint is saying that given all the support and influences on the Liberal Left, FRIEDMAN sees the pro-Israeli conservatives more likely to achieve victory at the polls.
Even with the al-Jazeera (America) on the far "Liberal Left" accompanied by CNN, the Daily Show and that formidable personality - Stephen Colbert, FREIDMAN is concerned that the statecraft of the "Conservative Right" has some sort of unfair advantage. (Go figure.)

Finally, the complaint is that a member of the State Department cannot say that the "West Bank Area "A" Settlements" are an impediment to peace. NEWS FLASH: Not once has the Arab Palestinians called for an Armistice and availed itself to the Dispute Resolution Processes. And what is more invalid is the fact that the Arab Palestinians do not want to negotiate. It is the Arab Palestinian Policy that: "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine. This is the overall strategy, not merely a tactical phase." Is that not the greater impediment to peace; and did it not come before the establishment of settlement?

It is a great little video peace. It is not worth the bandwidth it takes to publish the Title.

........View attachment 280788
Most Respectfully,
R
65306538_3244769162203599_3532769102433091584_n.jpg
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al

OK, Thomas Friedman has been awarded multiple Pulitzer Prizes, I think in this case he has it wrong, yet tells the truth.


An argument form is valid if and only if whenever the premises are all true, then conclusion is true.

In this case, he opens with three basic premises. They are half-truths, and do not lead to a true conclusion.

Thomas Friedman Brilliantly Explains Why Ilhan's Israel Comments Are Fundamentally True
(COMMENT)

First, FREIDMAN says that the Supreme Court says "unlimited Campaign donations. And then makes up the scenario that Candidate "A" {with the pro-Israel lobby [The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) approval]} run against Candidate "B" (with NO AIPAC support) then Candidate "A" makes three (3) phone calls and can get all the money needed to defeat Candidate "B."

◈ Now this can be true (but not necessarily true), but lets make the assumption that FREIDMAN is correct (benefit of the doubt).
◈ This complaint is about organizational funding capacity. Nearly every politician is concerned with campaign finance. And the campaign finance rules are the same for every candidate. Nothing prevents Candidate "B" from building a similar finance capacity as Candidate "B."
◈ The complaint is frivoulus. It is a child complaint of "NO FAIR" because the other guy can run faster and jump higher - and therefore wins.
Now we are talking about the political pull on the spectrum of politics. FREIDMAN complains that the is something wrong with the pro-Israel elements pulling to the "right" political contest to the "Right." What do we mean by "Right-Wing?" We are talking about "conservatives." As if being "conservative" is somehow "bad." The unspoken truth here is that the complaint is saying that given all the support and influences on the Liberal Left, FRIEDMAN sees the pro-Israeli conservatives more likely to achieve victory at the polls.
Even with the al-Jazeera (America) on the far "Liberal Left" accompanied by CNN, the Daily Show and that formidable personality - Stephen Colbert, FREIDMAN is concerned that the statecraft of the "Conservative Right" has some sort of unfair advantage. (Go figure.)

Finally, the complaint is that a member of the State Department cannot say that the "West Bank Area "A" Settlements" are an impediment to peace. NEWS FLASH: Not once has the Arab Palestinians called for an Armistice and availed itself to the Dispute Resolution Processes. And what is more invalid is the fact that the Arab Palestinians do not want to negotiate. It is the Arab Palestinian Policy that: "Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine. This is the overall strategy, not merely a tactical phase." Is that not the greater impediment to peace; and did it not come before the establishment of settlement?

It is a great little video peace. It is not worth the bandwidth it takes to publish the Title.

........View attachment 280788
Most Respectfully,
R
65306538_3244769162203599_3532769102433091584_n.jpg

That was one embarrassing drop ten and drop another ten and skedaddle.
 
Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus
1472111453.jpg


NABLUS, (PIC)

A group of Israeli settlers on Sunday attacked Palestinian farmers in Deir Sharaf village, west of Nablus City, and stole a large amount of olives.

Anti-settlement activist Ghassan Daghlas said that scores of Israeli settlers chased Palestinian farmers in their own lands and stole a large amount of olives that they were planning to harvest for the annual olive season.

Israeli settlers on a regular basis attack the Palestinian farmers in their lands in the West Bank, steal their crops and destroy their trees, and they are almost never prosecuted by the Israeli authorities.

Read more at
Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al

WOW, the sole source in most of these stories is The Palestinian Information Center (PIC). It openly admits that "the PIC does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people."

Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus

NABLUS, (PIC)

A group of Israeli settlers on Sunday attacked Palestinian farmers in Deir Sharaf village, west of Nablus City, and stole a large amount of olives

Read more at
Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center
(COMMENT)

I cannot find a single source on this information other than the PIC. I even did a search in the al-Jazeera Archive (admittedly only for 2019), and still cannot find anything that corroborates the story.

al-Jazeera Search •  2019-09-29 at 7.29.41 PM.png

Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus.png
Now there are, as you can see, a couple stories that comes-up that date back well over a decade. It is certainly not news.

Maybe you can point to a story that originates other than PIC.

........•  Smaller then Smallest.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al

WOW, the sole source in most of these stories is The Palestinian Information Center (PIC). It openly admits that "the PIC does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people."

Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus

NABLUS, (PIC)

A group of Israeli settlers on Sunday attacked Palestinian farmers in Deir Sharaf village, west of Nablus City, and stole a large amount of olives

Read more at
Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center
(COMMENT)

I cannot find a single source on this information other than the PIC. I even did a search in the al-Jazeera Archive (admittedly only for 2019), and still cannot find anything that corroborates the story.
Now there are, as you can see, a couple stories that comes-up that date back well over a decade. It is certainly not news.

Maybe you can point to a story that originates other than PIC.

........View attachment 281916
Most Respectfully,
R
WOW, the sole source in most of these stories is The Palestinian Information Center (PIC). It openly admits that "the PIC does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people."
Not unlike all of the one side reports from Israeli sources that are regularly linked on this board.

At least you don't get all of the name calling that you get from the Israeli sites.
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al

WOW, the sole source in most of these stories is The Palestinian Information Center (PIC). It openly admits that "the PIC does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people."

Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus

NABLUS, (PIC)

A group of Israeli settlers on Sunday attacked Palestinian farmers in Deir Sharaf village, west of Nablus City, and stole a large amount of olives

Read more at
Israeli settlers steal olive harvest in Nablus
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center
(COMMENT)

I cannot find a single source on this information other than the PIC. I even did a search in the al-Jazeera Archive (admittedly only for 2019), and still cannot find anything that corroborates the story.
Now there are, as you can see, a couple stories that comes-up that date back well over a decade. It is certainly not news.

Maybe you can point to a story that originates other than PIC.

........View attachment 281916
Most Respectfully,
R
WOW, the sole source in most of these stories is The Palestinian Information Center (PIC). It openly admits that "the PIC does not lay any claim to neutrality for it blatantly sides with the oppressed Palestinian people."
Not unlike all of the one side reports from Israeli sources that are regularly linked on this board.

At least you don't get all of the name calling that you get from the Israeli sites.

Except for being a willing accomplice to the promotion of fraud and propaganda, why attempt to justify your fraud and propaganda with childish, “but... but... but... but they do it too”?

Not surprising that you offered no demonstration of “the one side reports from Israeli sources”.

Just more fraud and propaganda.
 
I can't express the depth of my upsetted-ness that hamas is upset.

Jewish athletes in Qatar? Whats next, a Qatari ambassador to Israel with suitcases full of cash?



Hamas upset Qatar hosting Israel athletes


Hamas yesterday said it was “sorry” that Qatar was hosting Israeli sports teams and raising the Israeli flag in Doha.

“We [Hamas] are sorry that Qatar is hosting an Israeli sports team and raising the Israeli flag on its soil, while the Israeli occupation is committing crimes and violations against the Palestinians and holy sites and imposing a tight siege on Gaza,” Hamas said in a statement.
 
Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine

South Africa’s ambassador to the UN Jerry Matjila has criticized the UN for not implementing any of its 72 resolutions which it has adopted on Palestine since 1948.

Matjila, president of the Security Council for the month of October, made his remarks to al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper about the international community’s failure to help the Palestinian people achieve their aspirations for independence and freedom.

As a representative of his country, Matjila described South Africa’s position on the Palestinian cause and its support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights as “well-known and unquestionable.”

Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Just as a matter of notice, Ambassador Jerry Matjila is the rotation President of the Council for the month of October. And Ambassador Matjila is from "South Africa." South Africa ranks 113th on the Human Development Index (HDI); and Palestine ranks 119th on the HDI. In contrast, Israel ranks 22d on the HDI.

Why would anyone take the recommendation of South Africa and apply it to a country which has a very high level of human development. GET REAL!

Of all the Arab League Nations, only Oman (Ranking 48th)(GDP ≈ $80B) and Kuwait (Ranking 56th)(GDP ≈ $113B and an Oil Reserve of < 100B Barrels) hold a status of being very high in human development, and yet Israel still out-streches the both of them (GDP ≈ $360B). Of the Arab Countries, only the UAE and Saudi Arabia have a higher GDP.

Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine

South Africa’s ambassador to the UN Jerry Matjila has criticized the UN for not implementing any of its 72 resolutions which it has adopted on Palestine since 1948.

Matjila, president of the Security Council for the month of October, made his remarks to al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper about the international community’s failure to help the Palestinian people achieve their aspirations for independence and freedom.

As a representative of his country, Matjila described South Africa’s position on the Palestinian cause and its support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights as “well-known and unquestionable.”

Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine
(COMMENT)

I am not surprised that someone like Ambassador Matjila would make such a remark to the Palestinian expatriates News Outlet - al-Quds al-Arabi. It is a propaganda machine.

What I am surprized at is that you (P F Tinmore) would seem to support intervention by external forces.

I ask again, when did the Ramallah Government have control over the West Bank or Jerusalem?

The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

b ) a defined territory; The Ramallah Government has no control over a defined territory.
The big broad point is that the UN has nothing to offer to the situation. The only thing they can do is impair the most successfull country in the entire region for the sake of the most courrupt and terrorist laden country in the region. What purpose does that serve the inhabitants of the region.

Remember, the donor nations support for the UN Refugee and Works Agency (UNRWA), knowing just how strong the allegations of corruption are against the leadership's of its top officials, demonstrates that they are willing to perpetuate such behaviors on the part of the Arab Palestinians.

........•  Smaller then Smallest.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Just as a matter of notice, Ambassador Jerry Matjila is the rotation President of the Council for the month of October. And Ambassador Matjila is from "South Africa." South Africa ranks 113th on the Human Development Index (HDI); and Palestine ranks 119th on the HDI. In contrast, Israel ranks 22d on the HDI.

Why would anyone take the recommendation of South Africa and apply it to a country which has a very high level of human development. GET REAL!

Of all the Arab League Nations, only Oman (Ranking 48th)(GDP ≈ $80B) and Kuwait (Ranking 56th)(GDP ≈ $113B and an Oil Reserve of < 100B Barrels) hold a status of being very high in human development, and yet Israel still out-streches the both of them (GDP ≈ $360B). Of the Arab Countries, only the UAE and Saudi Arabia have a higher GDP.

Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine

South Africa’s ambassador to the UN Jerry Matjila has criticized the UN for not implementing any of its 72 resolutions which it has adopted on Palestine since 1948.

Matjila, president of the Security Council for the month of October, made his remarks to al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper about the international community’s failure to help the Palestinian people achieve their aspirations for independence and freedom.

As a representative of his country, Matjila described South Africa’s position on the Palestinian cause and its support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights as “well-known and unquestionable.”

Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine
(COMMENT)

I am not surprised that someone like Ambassador Matjila would make such a remark to the Palestinian expatriates News Outlet - al-Quds al-Arabi. It is a propaganda machine.

What I am surprized at is that you (P F Tinmore) would seem to support intervention by external forces.

I ask again, when did the Ramallah Government have control over the West Bank or Jerusalem?

The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

b ) a defined territory; The Ramallah Government has no control over a defined territory.
The big broad point is that the UN has nothing to offer to the situation. The only thing they can do is impair the most successfull country in the entire region for the sake of the most courrupt and terrorist laden country in the region. What purpose does that serve the inhabitants of the region.

Remember, the donor nations support for the UN Refugee and Works Agency (UNRWA), knowing just how strong the allegations of corruption are against the leadership's of its top officials, demonstrates that they are willing to perpetuate such behaviors on the part of the Arab Palestinians.

........View attachment 282989
Most Respectfully,
R
Holy deflection, Batman!
The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

b ) a defined territory; The Ramallah Government has no control over a defined territory.
Israel never had a defined territory. What is your point?
 
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Just as a matter of notice, Ambassador Jerry Matjila is the rotation President of the Council for the month of October. And Ambassador Matjila is from "South Africa." South Africa ranks 113th on the Human Development Index (HDI); and Palestine ranks 119th on the HDI. In contrast, Israel ranks 22d on the HDI.

Why would anyone take the recommendation of South Africa and apply it to a country which has a very high level of human development. GET REAL!

Of all the Arab League Nations, only Oman (Ranking 48th)(GDP ≈ $80B) and Kuwait (Ranking 56th)(GDP ≈ $113B and an Oil Reserve of < 100B Barrels) hold a status of being very high in human development, and yet Israel still out-streches the both of them (GDP ≈ $360B). Of the Arab Countries, only the UAE and Saudi Arabia have a higher GDP.

Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine

South Africa’s ambassador to the UN Jerry Matjila has criticized the UN for not implementing any of its 72 resolutions which it has adopted on Palestine since 1948.

Matjila, president of the Security Council for the month of October, made his remarks to al-Quds al-Arabi newspaper about the international community’s failure to help the Palestinian people achieve their aspirations for independence and freedom.

As a representative of his country, Matjila described South Africa’s position on the Palestinian cause and its support for the Palestinian people and their legitimate rights as “well-known and unquestionable.”

Matjila: UN did not implement any of its resolutions on Palestine
(COMMENT)

I am not surprised that someone like Ambassador Matjila would make such a remark to the Palestinian expatriates News Outlet - al-Quds al-Arabi. It is a propaganda machine.

What I am surprized at is that you (P F Tinmore) would seem to support intervention by external forces.

I ask again, when did the Ramallah Government have control over the West Bank or Jerusalem?

The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

b ) a defined territory; The Ramallah Government has no control over a defined territory.
The big broad point is that the UN has nothing to offer to the situation. The only thing they can do is impair the most successfull country in the entire region for the sake of the most courrupt and terrorist laden country in the region. What purpose does that serve the inhabitants of the region.

Remember, the donor nations support for the UN Refugee and Works Agency (UNRWA), knowing just how strong the allegations of corruption are against the leadership's of its top officials, demonstrates that they are willing to perpetuate such behaviors on the part of the Arab Palestinians.

........View attachment 282989
Most Respectfully,
R
Holy deflection, Batman!
The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

b ) a defined territory; The Ramallah Government has no control over a defined territory.
Israel never had a defined territory. What is your point?
You're going off on your conspiracy theory rants again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top