All three towers collapsed by controlled demolition on 9/11 .

[Gamolon]

I agree that you are a grammar nazi making distinctions without a difference

Then you think Angelo is also a grammar nazi because he's the one that changed his wording, not me.

 

[Soupnazi630]

We're just asking questions. So why are you taking it so personally ?

No you are not.

Why do you keep lying?

You are asking nothing, you are making ludicrous and ASSERTIONS based on ignorance and outright lies.

You really are a fucking coward

 

[KokomoJojo]

Then you think Angelo is also a grammar nazi because he's the one that changed his wording, not me.

gam your titanic is already sucking water on the bottom, too late to refloat it now.

 

[Gamolon]

gam your titanic is already sucking water on the bottom, too late to refloat it now.

I'm not the one dodging questions and believing things without proof.

 

[KokomoJojo]

I'm not the one dodging questions and believing things without proof.

that would be a lie gam, I asked you what practical difference there is between ideal and near freefall, you dodged it.

 

[Gamolon]

that would be a lie gam, I asked you what practical difference there is between ideal and near freefall, you dodged it.

I did answer it. You either missed it or ignored it. Not my problem.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you are the one that after 1000 posts we gave up on trying to teach that objects do not fall at the same speed in atmoshere as they do in space.

How fast do WTC beams fall in atmosphere?

 

[Gamolon]

How fast do WTC beams fall in atmosphere?

Truthers think -6.31 m/s2! That's with no resistance whatsoever and just gravity!!!!

 

[KokomoJojo]

I did answer it. You either missed it or ignored it. Not my problem.

your answer was nonresponsive so I filed in file 13

 

[KokomoJojo]

How fast do WTC beams fall in atmosphere?

how is that pertinent to the destruction of the towers

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

how is that pertinent to the destruction of the towers

It's pertinent to the discussion. Are you drunk?

 

[Soupnazi630]

that would be a lie gam, I asked you what practical difference there is between ideal and near freefall, you dodged it.

No you are the one lying. There is a significant practical difference between near free fall and free fall.

Nera free fall is LESS than free fall and Angelos idiotic theories only work if they came down AT free fall not NEAR free fall.

You are the one dodging and running like a coward.

Post some evidence

 

[Soupnazi630]

your answer was nonresponsive so I filed in file 13

He answered and in typical cowardly fashion you ignored it

Now post some fucking evidence

 

[KokomoJojo]

There is a significant practical difference between near free fall and free fall.

Which is?

 

[Gamolon]

Which is?

Ask Angelo. He's the one that changed his narrative.

 

[the other mike]

Is it common sense Angelo?

Explain how (we'll even use your perpetuated lie that the core columns were massive box columns made of 2" thick steel plate) 188 square feet of box columns would stop 43,264 square feet of debris falling from above? I'm just talking about visualizing this from the "horizontal plane" perspective.

The core columns were solid 2" thick 14" x 14" steel beams...... not plated. Why do you keep saying that ?

Save the disingenuous redundant questions for your Sunday school class Skippy.

 

[the other mike]

How fast do WTC beams fall in atmosphere?

We're talking about the core columns around the Elevator Shafts of each Building....... 47 of them......... massive steel columns going straight up from the ground up like telephone poles, as Illustrated in the video in the op.

But you already knew that didn't you, Todd ?
That's what I like about you ....your attention to detail.

 

[the other mike]

Ask Angelo. He's the one that changed his narrative.

Whatever I said about the core columns structurally was in this video......

It's not my video. If they're wrong email them and tell them about it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We're talking about the core columns around the Elevator Shafts of each Building....... 47 of them......... massive steel columns going straight up from the ground up like telephone poles, as Illustrated in the video in the op.

Fine, how fast do those columns fall in atmosphere?

 

[the other mike]

Fine, how fast do those columns fall in atmosphere?

These were vertical columns..... they weren't falling ( if you're referring to the horizontal beams that were thrown out and seen falling ) ...... they were cut with thermite detonators..... somewhere on the Upper Floors, and in the basement.

Don't take my word for it. There are about 3000 architects and engineers who are way smarter than me who can explain it much better than I can.

I'm just a lowly messenger boy.