- Thread starter
- #81
This is how people should discuss things, Sitarro. Would you prefer that I attack your character and rant about right wing conspiracies like you? Your emotions often get in the way of making a reasoned decision.
Notice how you talk about Clinton's attacks against al Qaeda and the war against Iraq in the same sentence. There is no relationship between the 2, comrade. The problem was terrorism, not a contained tyrant. This does not compute.
When addressing the War on Iraq as a consequence of 9-11, instead of Bush having lied about the possession of Iraq's WMD capability as the sole motivation behind our Middle East strategy of Islamist containment, refer to how Clinton failed to contain the problem at its earlier stage, doing nothing but lauching a few cruise missiles in the direction of some camps and an even an asparin factory, while two of our embassies were in rubble and a warship attacked.
Notice how you talk about Clinton's attacks against al Qaeda and the war against Iraq in the same sentence. There is no relationship between the 2, comrade. The problem was terrorism, not a contained tyrant. This does not compute.