freeandfun1
VIP Member
- Feb 14, 2004
- 6,201
- 296
- 83
sagegirl said:You base this opinion on what....it is a a well known dilemma that you cannot prove a negative....the alternative is the need to prove the positive. No amount of inspections (as the inspectors were already establishing) could produce the evidence of wmd's. Base your foundations and your opinions on established facts and you will not be so likely to end up with erroneous outcomes.
Did he comply with the UN's inspection program? No.
I have no idea how you have determined I am making assumptions. You are the one assuming.
It is a very well known fact that he had to comply with an ONGOING inspection program. It was not only a program to determine where his KNOWN and ACKNOWLEDGED stockpiles were, but a program to ensure he didn't restart any programs or rebuild any stocks. He impeded the UN and kept them from doing their job - as was acknowledged by the UN.
So you my dear, are the one using NO FACTS.