And now on to the more serious question of immunity. . .

SCOTUS should rule a President has immunity in conduct of his office

  • Yes

  • No

  • I don't care or have an opinion


Results are only viewable after voting.
Yup they waited 2 1/2 years and only filed AFTER he announced.

You're a hoot. When it's in favor of Trump A+B=C is speculative. When it's against Trump you have no problem accepting A+B=Purple.
They didnt wait 2.5 years, they filed charges when they were ready. You can’t just file charges before doing an investigation and that’s exactly what they did for the majority of that time.
 
The only people I truly 'hate' in this world is dimocrap scum.

I despise, detest and hate the dimocrap party. It is the worst political party in Human History. Worse than the National Socialists, worse than the Chinese communists, the Russian Socialists, worse than Pol Pot.......

Despicable, disgusting, repulsive and worthy of all the hate in the world. dimocraps are the most hateful and hated group the world has even known. And you deserve every bit of it.

The best Country that has ever been, the most free, the most equitable, egalitarian Country the World has ever known. We even fought a War, our most painful ever, to free an enslaved People, few of whom we even liked. Who else has ever done that?

And that's not good enough for you? Fuck....... You.

Roast in Hell. All of you
Another epic rant of nothingness! Fuck you too.
Again, you have not come within 100 miles of answering my questions, which were to another poster, by the way. So if you can, please tuck yourself back up POS45's ass and scream at him! You are not needed in this thread, or on this board. Seek professional help.
Bye!
 
Yup they waited 2 1/2 years and only filed AFTER he announced.

You're a hoot. When it's in favor of Trump A+B=C is speculative. When it's against Trump you have no problem accepting A+B=Purple.
But again, the malicious prosecution of Trump was the catalyst for the issue coming before the Supreme Court, but this OP is NOT about Trump or how much USMB trolls and leftists hate him.

It IS about how much protection the President--any and all who are President--should have from malicious or opportunist or vindictive prosecution when he exercises his responsibilities, duties, prerogatives as President of the United States. Should he have to live his life forever at risk of such prosecution?

I hope and pray that SCOTUS will rule that the President is immune for life from prosecution for anything other than high crimes and misdemeanors as described in the Constitution. Unethical politicians certainly should not be able to make up crimes or exaggerate things or take things out of context or anything else to hurt or disable a political opponent.
 
Foxfyre asks legitimate questions.

The answer is: he is immune from indictment while in office, and he is not immune from later criminal or civil acts that arose outside the duties of his office while in office.
Requiring impeachment and conviction before criminal charges essentially makes it legal for the president to do anything that they get 34 senators to agree to support.
 
It IS about how much protection the President--any and all who are President--should have from malicious or opportunist or vindictive prosecution when he exercises his responsibilities, duties, prerogatives as President of the United States. Should he have to live his life forever at risk of such prosecution?
The criminal justice system already protects them from malicious prosecution.
 
That’s not illegal. Doesn’t constitute a threat let alone a true threat.
Oh but see lib loons swear that “true threat” is not meaningful for make pretend insurrection charges
Which is it flip flopping wrist flapper. ??
 
Last edited:
January 6, 2021 - August 1, 2023 = 2 1/2 years.
They weren’t waiting. They were going through proper process which takes time.

The reason this is speculation is because it seems to rely on a counter factual, that charges wouldn’t have been filed if he wasn’t running. That seems extremely unlikely to me.
 
They did not exceed them in this case.
Well, when your cult starts whining that the Supreme Court is in Trump's pocket because they are delaying their immunity ruling, I trust you will let them know it was Garland's choice to wait the 2 1/2 years before bringing charges.
 
And it's also a fact.

The question in this instance is if a president is immune from prosecution for the criminal acts Trump committed while in office.

What you and your cult do not want is a careful and rational examination of degrees involving these specific incidentsm Because you know the crimes committed by the orange slob will fail that test.

So you zoom out and try to cover for him with a different question. Team Trump tried that and got laughed out of court.
he didn't commit any criminal acts RETARD. his speech was just a speech, and his calls were not criminal at all.
 
Well, when your cult starts whining that the Supreme Court is in Trump's pocket because they are delaying their immunity ruling, I trust you will let them know it was Garland's choice to wait the 2 1/2 years before bringing charges.
They will not delay the immunity ruling. DJT will on trial on time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top