Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, I guess we'll never know since your cult waited a full 2 1/2 years and only filed after Trump announced he was running against your cult's leader. In Bragg's case he waited a full 7+ years. Had to make sure that investigation was complete, huh? LOLThey weren’t waiting. They were going through proper process which takes time.
The reason this is speculation is because it seems to rely on a counter factual, that charges wouldn’t have been filed if he wasn’t running. That seems extremely unlikely to me.
Yep.Nope
None of that is grounds for appeal. LOLWell, I guess we'll never know since your cult waited a full 2 1/2 years and only filed after Trump announced he was running against your cult's leader. In Bragg's case he waited a full 7+ years. Had to make sure that investigation was complete, huh? LOL
Not what the head conspiracy loon in your cult is saying.They will not delay the immunity ruling. DJT will on trial on time.
Well, that’s what makes it speculative. It’s not the DoJ’s fault that Trump declared his candidacy before they were ready to bring charges.Well, I guess we'll never know since your cult waited a full 2 1/2 years and only filed after Trump announced he was running against your cult's leader. In Bragg's case he waited a full 7+ years. Had to make sure that investigation was complete, huh? LOL
Our loons can be as wrong as your loonsNot what the head conspiracy loon in your cult is saying.
Duh. Well maybe in the Bragg case. His pretzel machinations to make it a felony case to get under the SOL are quite questionable.None of that is grounds for appeal. LOL
It means nothing, and it would be a defense that will not hold up trial times.Well, that’s what makes it speculative. It’s not the DoJ’s fault that Trump declared his candidacy before they were ready to bring charges.
LOL and she was wearing a short skirt at the bar, so she asked for it.,Well, that’s what makes it speculative. It’s not the DoJ’s fault that Trump declared his candidacy before they were ready to bring charges.
Question it then, lose it, and spend millions more. And your equivalency is quite, quite poor.Duh. Well maybe in the Bragg case. His pretzel machinations to make it a felony case to get under the SOL are quite questionable.
Most of the witnesses and evidence against Benedict's criminal actions that went beyond his offical duties as president came from Republicans, including some from his inner circle.It IS about how much protection the President--any and all who are President--should have from malicious or opportunist or vindictive prosecution
No it would not be legal. But neither would it be within the scope of authorized presidential powers.
STFU duck. You know nothing of the US justice system. The POTUS is accountable to congress.
I'll consider your point when you start charging Obama with bombing a wedding and bombing doctors.Nixon didn't have to order his plumbers to break into anything. Furthermore if there is evidence of Carter, Clinton or Obama acting in a criminal manner, the DOJ should investigate. How many years did Durham investigate for an Obamagate moment? Benedict Donald didn't have to feed 'wild falsehoods' about the election to his supporters 'because he was angry he'd lost the election'.
"Impeachment, conviction, and removal are a specific intra-governmental safety valve. It is not the criminal justice system, where individual accountability is the paramount goal."
"Put anther way, in the language of today: President Trump is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations has run, still liable for everything he did while in office, didn't get away with anything yet – yet.
We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation. And former presidents are not immune from being held accountable by either one."
Because that's absurd.They weren’t waiting. They were going through proper process which takes time.
The reason this is speculation is because it seems to rely on a counter factual, that charges wouldn’t have been filed if he wasn’t running. That seems extremely unlikely to me.
Huh?LOL and she was wearing a short skirt at the bar, so she asked for it.,
Too bad for you Bragg's case is a complete joke. It's going to make your cult look terrible. Hell, we still don't know what crime Trump allegedly committed.Question it then, lose it, and spend millions more. And your equivalency is quite, quite poor.
He didn't. No charges were ever proffered during the two plus years between resignation and pardon. Ask Gerald Ford, he wasn't known for the greatest decisions in the world, but he was head and shoulders above this current class of demofascists.So why did Nixon need a pardon? Why did Clinton need a plea deal before he left office?
Trump declared early precisely because he heard indictments were imminent.Huh?
I’m saying the DoJ would have prosecuted Trump either way. It seems pretty convenient that you blame the DoJ for prosecuting him after Trump declared when they have no control over him.
