Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,865
- 55,487
- 3,600
He is holding nothing. The military has the same documents.Trump said he was holding secret military documents.
if he wasn't, then he's a liar.
Plain and simple
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He is holding nothing. The military has the same documents.Trump said he was holding secret military documents.
if he wasn't, then he's a liar.
Plain and simple
Quote him accurately. ButTrump said he was holding secret military documents.
if he wasn't, then he's a liar.
Plain and simple
Strangely if Trump and Jack Smith were members of this forum, and Trump said the same thing on this forum, he would have been severely sanctioned for threatening Jack Smith's family.There was no threat. Your hollow insistence on invoking that blatantly false claim reflects poorly on you. Very poorly.
Trump claimed to be holding a military document.
Holding nothing. Trump claimed he was holding a lot of papers.He is holding nothing. The military has the same documents.
There is the Jack Smith indictment, and the CNN tape.Quote him accurately. But
You won’t.
I did. And you are lying.There is the Jack Smith indictment, and the CNN tape.
You can read and listen to them like I did.
Are you saying the military does not have the documents?Holding nothing. Trump claimed he was holding a lot of papers.
If Trump was holding nothing, then again, he was lying.
This argument defending Trump is not going well for you.
Quote it. Don’t give us your fake-ass summary. Quote exactly what was said. With citation.
But, of course, you won’t.
To be clear, the civil case is still ongoing. the criminal case resulting in multimillion dollar fines.Not one word of that made sense. A criminal verdict in a civil case? How absurd.
Libel...For the benefit of all you libs; no verdict in any civil case includes the word “guilty.”
Now take a step back. If he’s holding up a news article at that moment, and he’s talking about the subject matter of that piece, it doesn’t require that the news article itself be secret.“Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this,”
“This was done by the military and given to me.”
“Well, with Milley – uh, let me see that, I’ll show you an example. He said that I wanted to attack Iran. Isn’t that amazing? I have a big pile of papers, this thing just came up. Look. This was him,”
“They presented me this – this is off the record, but – they presented me this. This was him. This was the Defense Department and him. We looked at some. This was him. This wasn’t done by me, this was him.” - Donald J. Trump at Bedminster
I did. And you are lying.
As I said, “but you won’t.”
Liable.To be clear, the civil case is still ongoing. the criminal case resulting in multimillion dollar fines.
Libel...
If jack smith was on this forum, he would get banned for breaking the rulesStrangely if Trump and Jack Smith were members of this forum, and Trump said the same thing on this forum, he would have been severely sanctioned for threatening Jack Smith's family.
Except Trump specifically said it was from the military, from the defense department, and from Milley.Now take a step back. If he’s holding up a news article at that moment, and he’s talking about the subject matter of that piece, it doesn’t require that the news article itself be secret.
Moron. Try to follow along for once. If the topic of an article he is speaking about concerns the secret Iran invasion recommendation, then he doesn’t have to be talking about a secret newspaper article. He is talking about the topic of that article and it is the topic which is secret.I'm not sure this will post but here's the audio from CNN
The topic of that article was the recommendation from Milley.Except Trump specifically said it was from the military, from the defense department, and from Milley.
it wasn't an article, it was a document from the military, from the department of defense, and from General Milley.Moron. Try to follow along for once. If the topic of an article he is speaking about concerns the secret Iran invasion recommendation, then he doesn’t have to be talking about a secret newspaper article. He is talking about the topic of that article and it is the topic which is secret.
You’re very dense.
No, the papers in Trumps hands, were from the military, from the department of defense, and from General Milley.The topic of that article was the recommendation from Milley.
And?
When will he be held responsible for threatening people and their families?