Another hate-crime hoax? The left tells stories too bad to be true -

asaratis

Uppity Senior Citizen
Gold Supporting Member
Jun 20, 2009
18,663
7,658
390
Stockbridge
Tawana Brawley was a useful hoax for those with investments in racial turmoil. Lies about the history of gun control are useful to those promoting the circumvention of our Bill of Rights. Lies are useful to liberals. That is why they lie profusely and promote the lies that appear useful to any cause they may pursue.


Another hate-crime hoax? The left tells stories too bad to be true | Rare





We thought we knew this tragic story.

It was late and Matthew Shepard, a young gay college student in Wyoming, needed a ride home. He left the Fireside Lounge with two strangers who offered a lift. Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson were not Good Samaritans, however. They took Shepard to a remote outskirt of Laramie, tied him to a fence post and pistol-whipped him so many times that the cyclist who found him the next day mistook him for a scarecrow.

....

In 2000, Stephen Jimenez — an award-winning gay journalist — went to Laramie to research a screenplay he wanted to write about this incident. But when he got there, he realized the Shepard story was not a clear-cut case of violent bigotry. After interviewing more than 100 sources over the course of thirteen years, he realized a very different truth: Shepard’s murders weren’t strangers who killed him because of homophobic panic. In fact, they were his gay lovers.

Jimenez’s new book, “The Book of Matt,” posits the true circumstances of Shepard’s brutal murder involved drugs and sex — not rampant homophobia.

....

In other words, the left doesn’t mind deception, if the deception exists for “valuable reasons.”

The Matthew Shepard story may now end up as one of a long line of leftist fabrications — fabrications that existed for the sake of an allegedly higher cause. Austin Ruse notes that Roe v. Wade rested on lies. For that matter, so did Lawrence v. Texas, the case that established a constitutional right to sodomy.

It is telling that many of the left’s greatest cultural accomplishments are built on hoaxes. The oppressive America they claim exists simply had to be made up. The reality was far too benign to fit the “No justice! No peace!” paradigm that motivates the leftist masses and their willing allies in the media.

In the cases of Roe, and Lawrence and Matthew Shepard, the cultural damage has already been done. But now citizens are on notice.

Beware when the left tells stories that seem too bad to be true.
 
Interesting.

I wouldn't be surprised to find that the left lied and used shepard's death as a means to achieve an agenda even if it meant lying.
 
Statement by the Matthew Shepard foundation:

"Attempts now to rewrite the story of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources, factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather than the actual evidence gathered by law enforcement and presented in a court of law. We do not respond to innuendo, rumor or conspiracy theories. Instead we recommit ourselves to honoring Matthew’s memory, and refuse to be intimidated by those who seek to tarnish it. We owe that to the tens of thousands of donors, activists, volunteers, and allies to the cause of equality who have made our work possible."
 
The communist have a concept called 'objective reality'. Anything that advances the class struggle is real. What could or should have happened is what counts. Facts just get in the way of objective truth and are best supressed. Over the decades this useful doctrine has permeated the entire left.
 
The book which is the actual subject of this topic was written by a gay man investigating Shepard's death. So let's not go off the deep end with hysterics about liberal and homosexual agendas, eh? You sound like fools. The gay community has as many shades of gray as the rest of society.

I appreciate the pursuit of truth by the author more than the celebratory moral high-fives I see here.

The author claims one of the killers, McKinney, is gay. McKinney denies this vehemently, but the author cites people who knew the two of them.

Here is the source article: Have We Got Matthew Shepard All Wrong? | Advocate.com

That's a gay publication. Too bad the topic starter did not bother to follow the OP link back to the source and chose to poison the well instead.

I find this part the most interesting:

By several accounts, McKinney had been on a meth bender for five days prior to the murder, and spent much of October 6 trying to find more drugs. By the evening he was so wound up that he attacked three other men in addition to Shepard.

I am curious to know if the mob of media which descended on this event in 1998 discovered these other attacks. I am curious to know if the prosecutor knew this.

It certainly undermines the "gay panic" defense considerably.
 
Last edited:
Statement by the Matthew Shepard foundation:

"Attempts now to rewrite the story of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources, factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather than the actual evidence gathered by law enforcement and presented in a court of law. We do not respond to innuendo, rumor or conspiracy theories. Instead we recommit ourselves to honoring Matthew’s memory, and refuse to be intimidated by those who seek to tarnish it. We owe that to the tens of thousands of donors, activists, volunteers, and allies to the cause of equality who have made our work possible."

That is addressed in the source article.
 
Statement by the Matthew Shepard foundation:

"Attempts now to rewrite the story of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources, factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather than the actual evidence gathered by law enforcement and presented in a court of law. We do not respond to innuendo, rumor or conspiracy theories. Instead we recommit ourselves to honoring Matthew’s memory, and refuse to be intimidated by those who seek to tarnish it. We owe that to the tens of thousands of donors, activists, volunteers, and allies to the cause of equality who have made our work possible."

Lol, just like you went by the facts in the martin case? Omg you went with the story the media fabricated. Liberals are a hoot!
 
Last edited:
Statement by the Matthew Shepard foundation:

"Attempts now to rewrite the story of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources, factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather than the actual evidence gathered by law enforcement and presented in a court of law. We do not respond to innuendo, rumor or conspiracy theories. Instead we recommit ourselves to honoring Matthew’s memory, and refuse to be intimidated by those who seek to tarnish it. We owe that to the tens of thousands of donors, activists, volunteers, and allies to the cause of equality who have made our work possible."

Of course they will defend the original premise. They have financial interests in the continuance of donations....as did Al Sharpton in the Tawana Brawley hoax.
 

Forum List

Back
Top