Another terrorist attack

[Pogo]

When some Christian wack job goes on a rampage, he isn't part of an organized group of people with funding,

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

 

[Godboy]

When some Christian wack job goes on a rampage, he isn't part of an organized group of people with funding,

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

 

[Pogo]

When some Christian wack job goes on a rampage, he isn't part of an organized group of people with funding,

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

Uh... whaaat?

Bizarre post. "Jewish controlled media"?

Wassamatta? Can't handle the truth? Trying to deflect?

 

[Carla_Danger]

When some Christian wack job goes on a rampage, he isn't part of an organized group of people with funding,

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

Where the hell did that come from?

 

[Pogo]

When some Christian wack job goes on a rampage, he isn't part of an organized group of people with funding,

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

Where the hell did that come from?

I know, right? Must be wunna them anti-Semites, I dunno. Guess I smashed his point and he gets all uppity.

Not sure what a "consiracy" is but I guess it's when you have two fathers.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

Where the hell did that come from?

I know, right? Must be wunna them anti-Semites, I dunno. Guess I smashed his point and he gets all uppity.

Not sure what a "consiracy" is but I guess it's when you have two fathers.

And in Alabummer, its when your uncle is also your father. LOL!

 

[Rocko]

I retract my apology. You definitely are the creepy, dishonest weirdo I thought you were.

Don't you uh, need to put an apology out before you can retract it?

Again sir, I say, there is nothing "creepy" or "dishonest" about the English Language. Weird? Granted. Illogical yes, as most languages are, but not "creepy".

Again, a "lie" is a false statement. A "statement" in turn requires a verb in order to BE a statement. The title of this thread contains no verb, therefore it is not a statement. It is not even a sentence. It's what journalism calls a "teaser" -- you have to look in further to see what the story is. Which you did, therefore in your case it worked.

You are correct, sir. I sincerely apologize.

Now that that is out of the way I retract my apology, you dishonest creep.

Luddy, (who is a freak show) is lying. He/she/more like it is being as dishonest as one can get, clearly LYING to the board. You want to play semantics instead of recognizing the freak is a dishonest partisan hack, which shows you're dishonest.

 

[Pogo]

I retract my apology. You definitely are the creepy, dishonest weirdo I thought you were.

Don't you uh, need to put an apology out before you can retract it?

Again sir, I say, there is nothing "creepy" or "dishonest" about the English Language. Weird? Granted. Illogical yes, as most languages are, but not "creepy".

Again, a "lie" is a false statement. A "statement" in turn requires a verb in order to BE a statement. The title of this thread contains no verb, therefore it is not a statement. It is not even a sentence. It's what journalism calls a "teaser" -- you have to look in further to see what the story is. Which you did, therefore in your case it worked.

You are correct, sir. I sincerely apologize.

Now that that is out of the way I retract my apology, you dishonest creep.

All bettah.

Luddy, (who is a freak show) is lying. He/she/more like it is being as dishonest as one can get, clearly LYING to the board. You want to play semantics instead of recognizing the freak is a dishonest partisan hack, which shows you're dishonest.

What's Lud "lying" about then, since it's not in the title?

Is the story itself not true?
And no, pointing out how English works is not "dishonest". If it is, it makes you dishonest too, since you just agreed that I am correct.

Hiya.

 

[Rocko]

I retract my apology. You definitely are the creepy, dishonest weirdo I thought you were.

Don't you uh, need to put an apology out before you can retract it?

Again sir, I say, there is nothing "creepy" or "dishonest" about the English Language. Weird? Granted. Illogical yes, as most languages are, but not "creepy".

Again, a "lie" is a false statement. A "statement" in turn requires a verb in order to BE a statement. The title of this thread contains no verb, therefore it is not a statement. It is not even a sentence. It's what journalism calls a "teaser" -- you have to look in further to see what the story is. Which you did, therefore in your case it worked.

You are correct, sir. I sincerely apologize.

Now that that is out of the way I retract my apology, you dishonest creep.

All bettah.

Luddy, (who is a freak show) is lying. He/she/more like it is being as dishonest as one can get, clearly LYING to the board. You want to play semantics instead of recognizing the freak is a dishonest partisan hack, which shows you're dishonest.

What's Lud "lying" about then, since it's not in the title?

Is the story itself not true?
And no, pointing out how English works is not "dishonest". If it is, it makes you dishonest too, since you just agreed that I am correct.

Hiya.

Was there another terrorist attack?

 

[Pogo]

I retract my apology. You definitely are the creepy, dishonest weirdo I thought you were.

Don't you uh, need to put an apology out before you can retract it?

Again sir, I say, there is nothing "creepy" or "dishonest" about the English Language. Weird? Granted. Illogical yes, as most languages are, but not "creepy".

Again, a "lie" is a false statement. A "statement" in turn requires a verb in order to BE a statement. The title of this thread contains no verb, therefore it is not a statement. It is not even a sentence. It's what journalism calls a "teaser" -- you have to look in further to see what the story is. Which you did, therefore in your case it worked.

You are correct, sir. I sincerely apologize.

Now that that is out of the way I retract my apology, you dishonest creep.

All bettah.

Luddy, (who is a freak show) is lying. He/she/more like it is being as dishonest as one can get, clearly LYING to the board. You want to play semantics instead of recognizing the freak is a dishonest partisan hack, which shows you're dishonest.

What's Lud "lying" about then, since it's not in the title?

Is the story itself not true?
And no, pointing out how English works is not "dishonest". If it is, it makes you dishonest too, since you just agreed that I am correct.

Hiya.

Was there another terrorist attack?

Did someone say there was?

Again I ask, since I didn't get an answer -- is the story not true? Yes or no?

 

[Rocko]

I retract my apology. You definitely are the creepy, dishonest weirdo I thought you were.

Don't you uh, need to put an apology out before you can retract it?

Again sir, I say, there is nothing "creepy" or "dishonest" about the English Language. Weird? Granted. Illogical yes, as most languages are, but not "creepy".

Again, a "lie" is a false statement. A "statement" in turn requires a verb in order to BE a statement. The title of this thread contains no verb, therefore it is not a statement. It is not even a sentence. It's what journalism calls a "teaser" -- you have to look in further to see what the story is. Which you did, therefore in your case it worked.

You are correct, sir. I sincerely apologize.

Now that that is out of the way I retract my apology, you dishonest creep.

All bettah.

Luddy, (who is a freak show) is lying. He/she/more like it is being as dishonest as one can get, clearly LYING to the board. You want to play semantics instead of recognizing the freak is a dishonest partisan hack, which shows you're dishonest.

What's Lud "lying" about then, since it's not in the title?

Is the story itself not true?
And no, pointing out how English works is not "dishonest". If it is, it makes you dishonest too, since you just agreed that I am correct.

Hiya.

Was there another terrorist attack?

Did someone say there was?

Again I ask, since I didn't get an answer -- is the story not true? Yes or no?

One can only infer from reading the title that there was. Hence the lie. The story is true. Do you have a point?

 

[bripat9643]

3 Rome men now face domestic terrorism charge
Three Rome men accused of conspiring to obtain explosives now face a much more serious domestic terrorism charge — conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction.


Terry Eugene Peace, Brian Edward Cannon and Cory Robert Williamson on Monday waived arraignment and pleaded not guilty to the domestic terrorism charge as well as charges of conspiring to defraud the government.


Use of weapons of mass destruction can carry up to a life term in prison in this case, according to the law website Justia.com.


According to the indictment and criminal complaint:


Peace, Cannon and Williamson — all members of a militia in Georgia — participated in online chat discussions between Jan. 23 and Feb. 15, 2014, that were monitored by the FBI.


During the conversations online, they discussed using guerilla war tactics and planned to launch attacks against a metro Atlanta police station and several government agencies in February 2014.


The three men attempted to “recruit other individuals to join them and to carry out similar operations in those individuals’ home states.”


Peace allegedly told other militia members to choose targets including “road blocks, TSA checkpoints, sheriffs/police conducting operations outside the Constitution” as well as to participate in the “removal of government people who support extra-Constitutional activities.”


In February 2014, the men traveled from Rome to Tennessee for a meeting with an undercover FBI source about getting several explosive devices, including a thermite-mix charge and a dozen pipe bombs constructed for “maximum fragmentation.”


Phone conversations with an informant recorded Peace requesting explosives and telling the informant the devices were a “key element” to their plan.


The men were arrested in Cartersville on Feb. 15, 2014, when they took possession of inert explosives and other material given to the source by the FBI.

Terry Eugene Peace


Brian Edward Cannon


Cory Robert Williamson

Gotta wonder how many more nutters like this are out there, plotting against their country.

More at the link.

I noticed no mention of weapons of mass destruction except by the author of the article.

 

[Rocko]

3 Rome men now face domestic terrorism charge
Three Rome men accused of conspiring to obtain explosives now face a much more serious domestic terrorism charge — conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction.


Terry Eugene Peace, Brian Edward Cannon and Cory Robert Williamson on Monday waived arraignment and pleaded not guilty to the domestic terrorism charge as well as charges of conspiring to defraud the government.


Use of weapons of mass destruction can carry up to a life term in prison in this case, according to the law website Justia.com.


According to the indictment and criminal complaint:


Peace, Cannon and Williamson — all members of a militia in Georgia — participated in online chat discussions between Jan. 23 and Feb. 15, 2014, that were monitored by the FBI.


During the conversations online, they discussed using guerilla war tactics and planned to launch attacks against a metro Atlanta police station and several government agencies in February 2014.


The three men attempted to “recruit other individuals to join them and to carry out similar operations in those individuals’ home states.”


Peace allegedly told other militia members to choose targets including “road blocks, TSA checkpoints, sheriffs/police conducting operations outside the Constitution” as well as to participate in the “removal of government people who support extra-Constitutional activities.”


In February 2014, the men traveled from Rome to Tennessee for a meeting with an undercover FBI source about getting several explosive devices, including a thermite-mix charge and a dozen pipe bombs constructed for “maximum fragmentation.”


Phone conversations with an informant recorded Peace requesting explosives and telling the informant the devices were a “key element” to their plan.


The men were arrested in Cartersville on Feb. 15, 2014, when they took possession of inert explosives and other material given to the source by the FBI.

Terry Eugene Peace


Brian Edward Cannon


Cory Robert Williamson

Gotta wonder how many more nutters like this are out there, plotting against their country.

More at the link.

I noticed no mention of weapons of mass destruction except by the author of the article.

Haha Thank you!

 

[Godboy]

When some Christian wack job goes on a rampage, he isn't part of an organized group of people with funding,

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

Where the hell did that come from?

Seattle

 

[Rocko]

The OP is obviously trying hard. Lying, making sure we see the pictures of the white guys, etc.. Yeah he's has no agenda but the truth. /sarcasm.

 

[Pogo]

Don't you uh, need to put an apology out before you can retract it?

Again sir, I say, there is nothing "creepy" or "dishonest" about the English Language. Weird? Granted. Illogical yes, as most languages are, but not "creepy".

Again, a "lie" is a false statement. A "statement" in turn requires a verb in order to BE a statement. The title of this thread contains no verb, therefore it is not a statement. It is not even a sentence. It's what journalism calls a "teaser" -- you have to look in further to see what the story is. Which you did, therefore in your case it worked.

You are correct, sir. I sincerely apologize.

Now that that is out of the way I retract my apology, you dishonest creep.

All bettah.

Luddy, (who is a freak show) is lying. He/she/more like it is being as dishonest as one can get, clearly LYING to the board. You want to play semantics instead of recognizing the freak is a dishonest partisan hack, which shows you're dishonest.

What's Lud "lying" about then, since it's not in the title?

Is the story itself not true?
And no, pointing out how English works is not "dishonest". If it is, it makes you dishonest too, since you just agreed that I am correct.

Hiya.

Was there another terrorist attack?

Did someone say there was?

Again I ask, since I didn't get an answer -- is the story not true? Yes or no?

One can only infer from reading the title that there was. Hence the lie. The story is true. Do you have a point?

Then that's on you. The title says no such thing. So if there's a "lie", it belongs to you.

Title: "Another terrorist attack".
That's it. No verb.
"Another terrorist attack" could be followed by "...thwarted by FBI". It could be followed by "...likely". It could be followed by anything.

But it wasn't. You plugged it in from your own imagination.

Whose fault is that? Yours, that's who.

You're right back where you started. When I pointed this out the first time you called it "dishonest" and even "creepy".

But there it is. You own the whole thing. Man up. The only "dishonesty" here is your own.

 

[Godboy]

When some Christian wack job goes on a rampage, he isn't part of an organized group of people with funding,

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

Uh... whaaat?

Bizarre post. "Jewish controlled media"?

Wassamatta? Can't handle the truth? Trying to deflect?

Yeah, your "truth" was so overwhelming I just didn't know what to do. You are really good at this stuff man. Actually no, im just kidding. I will refer you to my previous post where I called you a dummy and told you to shut up.

 

[2aguy]

hmmmm...how does the excuse for Muslim terrorists go........oh yeah.......these guys aren't really militia types.....they don't represent militia types....

 

[Rocko]

You are correct, sir. I sincerely apologize.

Now that that is out of the way I retract my apology, you dishonest creep.

All bettah.

Luddy, (who is a freak show) is lying. He/she/more like it is being as dishonest as one can get, clearly LYING to the board. You want to play semantics instead of recognizing the freak is a dishonest partisan hack, which shows you're dishonest.

What's Lud "lying" about then, since it's not in the title?

Is the story itself not true?
And no, pointing out how English works is not "dishonest". If it is, it makes you dishonest too, since you just agreed that I am correct.

Hiya.

Was there another terrorist attack?

Did someone say there was?

Again I ask, since I didn't get an answer -- is the story not true? Yes or no?

One can only infer from reading the title that there was. Hence the lie. The story is true. Do you have a point?

Then that's on you. The title says no such thing. So if there's a "lie", it belongs to you.

Title: "Another terrorist attack".
That's it. No verb.
"Another terrorist attack" could be followed by "thwarted by FBI". It could be followed by "likely". It could be followed by anything.

But it wasn't. You plugged it in from your own imagination.
Whose fault is that? Yours, that's who.
You're right back where you started. When I pointed this out the first time you called it "dishonest" and even "creepy".
But there it is. You own the whole thing. Man up. The only "dishonesty" here is your own.

You want to argue semantics. Too bad. The author does not get off on a technicality. In spirt he was lying....Yes or no?

 

[Pogo]

Obviously you have never heard of organizations like Operation Rescue.

If i havent heard of them, then obviously they arent as big of a problem as AQ or ISIS are, which is why you dont hear people complaining about them.

Uh... no Grasshopper. How much you've "heard of" something is not a function of how important it is. It's a function of how much media splash it gets. And how much media splash something gets is a function of how much it sells. And how much something sells in media is a function of how emotionally it can be presented. And the most effective way to do that is Fear, and the most effective way to sell Fear is Fresh Fear -- something that's a blank slate to be filled in, some entity that's not well understood, preferably too far away to contradict those impressions.

Oh look where we are.

Oh god, you arent about to start prattling on about the jewish controlled media and their consiracy to hide the news are you? Just shut up dummy.

Uh... whaaat?

Bizarre post. "Jewish controlled media"?

Wassamatta? Can't handle the truth? Trying to deflect?

Yeah, your "truth" was so overwhelming I just didn't know what to do. You are really good at this stuff man. Actually no, im just kidding. I will refer you to my previous post where I called you a dummy and told you to shut up.

Which made no sense. I posted about media, you posted about "Jooos".
When you think of a salient point, ooze back. Until then....