Another Win For Equality

[martybegan]

And the Right is using the vocabulary of the victim. Religious freedom is "attacked" by Liberal "Facsists".

Let's consider the order of battle and the means of these 'attacks'. LGBT clients come to these businesses as paying customers with the expectation they will be served just as all other paying customers. They come with cash or credit cards in hand.

How terrible! How wholly offensive!

And how do these Christian business owners respond? By citing the primary tenets of their faith. Love thy neighbor as you would be loved yourself. Wait a minute! That can't be right!

Judge not lest ye be judged! Hold on! That's not the right passage.

He who is without sin shall cast the first stone! Nope! Something amiss with that bit of teaching.

Oh well, it's in that Bible someplace. Check the back. If Brother Fred Phelps was still among the living he'd know. He made his bread and butter beating up Gays.

I wonder how these brave defenders of homophia mascarading as pious Christians would feel if the scorn reined down on them was anywhere as telling as the scorn their fellow Conservatives felt toward the Westboro Baptists when they held signs reading "God Hates Fags" at veteran's funerals?

Religious freedom! Is there no ignorance you cannot protect?

Another busy body who gets a woody at the misery of others. and of course, lets government enforce the misery because they don't have the balls to do it themselves.

It's not schadenfreude, it's about fairness, social and economic equality and the massive hypocrisy of those who 'getawoody' by repressing the existence of their fellow American citizens.

It's about "fairness" only for the causes you agree with, for everyone and everything else, its about using government to force your morals on others for no other reason that you think one form of butt hurt is more equal than another form of butt hurt.

And people don't repress, governments do. And the only repression going on is against people you don't agree with.

What irony.

No irony at all.

 

[Nosmo King]

And the Right is using the vocabulary of the victim. Religious freedom is "attacked" by Liberal "Facsists".

Let's consider the order of battle and the means of these 'attacks'. LGBT clients come to these businesses as paying customers with the expectation they will be served just as all other paying customers. They come with cash or credit cards in hand.

How terrible! How wholly offensive!

And how do these Christian business owners respond? By citing the primary tenets of their faith. Love thy neighbor as you would be loved yourself. Wait a minute! That can't be right!

Judge not lest ye be judged! Hold on! That's not the right passage.

He who is without sin shall cast the first stone! Nope! Something amiss with that bit of teaching.

Oh well, it's in that Bible someplace. Check the back. If Brother Fred Phelps was still among the living he'd know. He made his bread and butter beating up Gays.

I wonder how these brave defenders of homophia mascarading as pious Christians would feel if the scorn reined down on them was anywhere as telling as the scorn their fellow Conservatives felt toward the Westboro Baptists when they held signs reading "God Hates Fags" at veteran's funerals?

Religious freedom! Is there no ignorance you cannot protect?

Another busy body who gets a woody at the misery of others. and of course, lets government enforce the misery because they don't have the balls to do it themselves.

It's not schadenfreude, it's about fairness, social and economic equality and the massive hypocrisy of those who 'getawoody' by repressing the existence of their fellow American citizens.

It's about "fairness" only for the causes you agree with, for everyone and everything else, its about using government to force your morals on others for no other reason that you think one form of butt hurt is more equal than another form of butt hurt.

And people don't repress, governments do. And the only repression going on is against people you don't agree with.

What irony.

No irony at all.

Point 1: how are business owners being fair while they discriminate?

Point 2: how are these discriminating business owners NOT forcing their morality on others?

Point 3: discrimination is repression. Repression by merchantile impermatur.

 

[martybegan]

Another busy body who gets a woody at the misery of others. and of course, lets government enforce the misery because they don't have the balls to do it themselves.

It's not schadenfreude, it's about fairness, social and economic equality and the massive hypocrisy of those who 'getawoody' by repressing the existence of their fellow American citizens.

It's about "fairness" only for the causes you agree with, for everyone and everything else, its about using government to force your morals on others for no other reason that you think one form of butt hurt is more equal than another form of butt hurt.

And people don't repress, governments do. And the only repression going on is against people you don't agree with.

What irony.

No irony at all.

Point 1: how are business owners being fair while they discriminate?

Point 2: how are these discriminating business owners NOT forcing their morality on others?

Point 3: discrimination is repression. Repression by merchantile impermatur.

Point 1. Not your concern. F$*k off.

Point 2. Not your concern, and they can go easily to someone else who wants to work with them. Again, F%$k off.

Point 3. They can easily end the repression by going to another business. Finally, F&%k off.

 

[Nosmo King]

It's not schadenfreude, it's about fairness, social and economic equality and the massive hypocrisy of those who 'getawoody' by repressing the existence of their fellow American citizens.

It's about "fairness" only for the causes you agree with, for everyone and everything else, its about using government to force your morals on others for no other reason that you think one form of butt hurt is more equal than another form of butt hurt.

And people don't repress, governments do. And the only repression going on is against people you don't agree with.

What irony.

No irony at all.

Point 1: how are business owners being fair while they discriminate?

Point 2: how are these discriminating business owners NOT forcing their morality on others?

Point 3: discrimination is repression. Repression by merchantile impermatur.

Point 1. Not your concern. F$*k off.

Point 2. Not your concern, and they can go easily to someone else who wants to work with them. Again, F%$k off.

Point 3. They can easily end the repression by going to another business. Finally, F&%k off.

And there's a water fountain right beside the water fountain we don't want you drinking from. There's a motel three miles down the road because we don't want you staying here.

Separate but equal? They are never equal. And the 'go someplace else' argument is an argument for an apartheid system.

 

[martybegan]

It's about "fairness" only for the causes you agree with, for everyone and everything else, its about using government to force your morals on others for no other reason that you think one form of butt hurt is more equal than another form of butt hurt.

And people don't repress, governments do. And the only repression going on is against people you don't agree with.

What irony.

No irony at all.

Point 1: how are business owners being fair while they discriminate?

Point 2: how are these discriminating business owners NOT forcing their morality on others?

Point 3: discrimination is repression. Repression by merchantile impermatur.

Point 1. Not your concern. F$*k off.

Point 2. Not your concern, and they can go easily to someone else who wants to work with them. Again, F%$k off.

Point 3. They can easily end the repression by going to another business. Finally, F&%k off.

And there's a water fountain right beside the water fountain we don't want you drinking from. There's a motel three miles down the road because we don't want you staying here.

Separate but equal? They are never equal. And the 'go someplace else' argument is an argument for an apartheid system.

Those were examples of government mandated discrimination, which was systemic and designed to keep a whole group of people in economic and political serfdom. The government's response in that situation was right.

A gay couple having to spend 10 minutes finding another baker or catering hall, or photographer does not even come close to that standard.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I hadn't heard about this case until today.......I guess the liberal media missed the boat back in 2013.

Struggling Gortz Haus to close without wedding business

Read the whole thing, nutters. It explains how these fine Americans haven't had their religious liberty stolen.

Expressing joy at the suffering of others. What a class act.

Suffering by their own choices and design.

 

[martybegan]

I hadn't heard about this case until today.......I guess the liberal media missed the boat back in 2013.

Struggling Gortz Haus to close without wedding business

Read the whole thing, nutters. It explains how these fine Americans haven't had their religious liberty stolen.

Expressing joy at the suffering of others. What a class act.

Suffering by their own choices and design.

yes, because someone having to spend 15 minutes finding another vendor merits ruining the offending party via government fiat.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I hadn't heard about this case until today.......I guess the liberal media missed the boat back in 2013.

Struggling Gortz Haus to close without wedding business

Read the whole thing, nutters. It explains how these fine Americans haven't had their religious liberty stolen.

Expressing joy at the suffering of others. What a class act.

Suffering by their own choices and design.

yes, because someone having to spend 15 minutes finding another vendor merits ruining the offending party via government fiat.

The offending party ruined themselves. It was their own choice not to host weddings any longer. They could have paid the fine and moved foreward with their business.

 

[martybegan]

I hadn't heard about this case until today.......I guess the liberal media missed the boat back in 2013.

Struggling Gortz Haus to close without wedding business

Read the whole thing, nutters. It explains how these fine Americans haven't had their religious liberty stolen.

Expressing joy at the suffering of others. What a class act.

Suffering by their own choices and design.

yes, because someone having to spend 15 minutes finding another vendor merits ruining the offending party via government fiat.

The offending party ruined themselves. It was their own choice not to host weddings any longer. They could have paid the fine and moved foreward with their business.

Paid the fine every time? It isn't the fine, its the concept that government can force people to do something they don't want over something as trivial as this.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So a couple of homos targeted the old couple, eh?

Queer Nazis on the long KristalNacht.

The assclowns love it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So a couple of homos targeted the old couple, eh?

Queer Nazis on the long KristalNacht.

The assclowns love it.

Anyone paying attention knows the queers are targeting. People will tire of it...and then push back

 

[Uncensored2008]

This isn't a church. A church can refuse to marry them. And being a retarded racist is a choice.

You dickless dumb fuck.

You queer Nazis love your Kristal Nacht.

 

[bucs90]

I hadn't heard about this case until today.......I guess the liberal media missed the boat back in 2013.

Struggling Gortz Haus to close without wedding business

Read the whole thing, nutters. It explains how these fine Americans haven't had their religious liberty stolen.

Expressing joy at the suffering of others. What a class act.

Suffering by their own choices and design.

yes, because someone having to spend 15 minutes finding another vendor merits ruining the offending party via government fiat.

The offending party ruined themselves. It was their own choice not to host weddings any longer. They could have paid the fine and moved foreward with their business.

Paid the fine every time? It isn't the fine, its the concept that government can force people to do something they don't want over something as trivial as this.

Honestly. ..ive never had an opinion strongly about gay marriage in the past. Let em marry for all I care.

But NOW...after recent events? Im getting spiteful. Their lobby goes into a frenzy to destroy any business who wont cater to them. They are hypocrites. Live and let live. Unless you prefer not to host gay weddings...then you must be destroyed.

Its made me spiteful. I now enjoy seeing the gay lobby lose whenever that happens.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The offending party ruined themselves. It was their own choice not to host weddings any longer. They could have paid the fine and moved foreward with their business.

Yes, they were Das JUDEN.

Your Kristal Nacht took care of them. Windows broken and shop keepers beaten - they will know who runs this country.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Suffering by their own choices and design.

Seig Heil mein herr!

 

[bodecea]

So if a couple go to Emanuel AME church...and they want an antebellum Civil War reenactment wedding....with confederate flags and all....should they be forced to host it? They host other weddings. Right?

See how that works asshole?

I see you don't do well with equivalent analogies. Kindly let us know the similarities between a church and a business. Or....are you trying to insist that churches are nothing but businesses? If that is the case, then we need to push to have churches acquire business licenses and pay business taxes. Good idea there, buckeroo!

 

[G.T.]

I hadn't heard about this case until today.......I guess the liberal media missed the boat back in 2013.

Struggling Gortz Haus to close without wedding business

Read the whole thing, nutters. It explains how these fine Americans haven't had their religious liberty stolen.

Expressing joy at the suffering of others. What a class act.

Suffering by their own choices and design.

yes, because someone having to spend 15 minutes finding another vendor merits ruining the offending party via government fiat.

The government is charged with regulating commerce.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Anyone paying attention knows the queers are targeting. People will tire of it...and then push back

After what Roberts did today, what should restrain them? We are not a nation of laws. why should the Juden not be lawless in defending themselves from the Queer Nazis.

If homosexuals enter your place of business and demand you service them against your will - shoot them.

We are not a nation of laws, our courts have no respect at all for law - only might is right in this land - assertion through violence is the ONLY means of justice in light of the Roberts ruling.

 

[G.T.]

Anyone paying attention knows the queers are targeting. People will tire of it...and then push back

After what Roberts did today, what should restrain them? We are not a nation of laws. why should the Juden not be lawless in defending themselves from the Queer Nazis.

If homosexuals enter your place of business and demand you service them against your will - shoot them.

We are not a nation of laws, our courts have no respect at all for law - only might is right in this land - assertion through violence is the ONLY means of justice in light of the Roberts ruling.

Is this batshit loon calling for murder?



Good thing you're on a watch list, your types. Rightfully so.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
The government is charged with regulating commerce.

Our government is not constrained by law.

Did you miss the Roberts ruling?

Government rulers ARE the law. Government will do whatever the fuck they like - no silly paper, be it Constitution or otherwise, will limit what our rulers do.