Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
At some point, the court will need to address this.
It all depends if somebody has the money to challenge it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At some point, the court will need to address this.
Most of them aren't badsters until after they've legally obtained their guns.Do the gun fanciers plan to have a good gunster at every venue a bad gunster slaughters people?
The record of so many bad gunster victims strongly suggests that is not possible.
It would seem far more prudent to simply take measures to prevent the bad gunsters from easy access to guns.
Right. You have to be that guy....or fucking die.Actually, it only makes sense. When a bad guy with a gun shows up, even in the movies, we all can't wait for a good guy with a gun to show up.
But such outcomes are unusual. Only two out of 61 such attacks last year ended when armed bystanders engaged the active shooter, according to an FBI report in May.
View attachment 671831
He made a good point
If more guns made us safer, America would be the safest country in the WORLD. We need sensible gun laws, not vigilante safety nets.”
It's like applauding when you hear teachers have to dip into their own pockets to pay for student's supplies.
Why are these shooters shooting? It's like they want to play Grand Theft Auto with only one life.
But I do not mind good guys with ccw permits carrying guns.
Lots of reasons. If I had a gun, I'd still run away. LOL
Or because the guy kills the good guy with a gun first? We don't know how many good guys with guns the mass shooters have taken out.
Or because the guy kills himself before the good guy with a gun can.
Or because the cops sit and wait will the shooter is picking off kids one at a time for 45 minutes. Afraid to go in. Waiting for orders. Cowards.
I think anyone who wants to be able to conceal carry should have to take the class. But it wouldn't surprise me if the Supreme Court said forcing someone to take a class or pay money to exercise their constitutional rights is unconstitutional.The state can still refuse you a license but it has to be for a legitimate reason like a past felony, a threat to somebody, or things like that. But they placed no restrictions on what guidelines the had to follow. They could make CCW's cost you $800.00 for instance, or require two weeks training or being able to hit a target 30 feet away with a handgun without any misses. Just stupid shit like that.
I don't think the courts went far enough as to what they can be restricted from doing.
How about unhinged cons who go around shooting people because they believe like you do? They aren't a problem?We have all the gun laws we need….while mass public shootings are rare, criminals released by democrat party judges and prosecutors are driving our gun crime problem in democrat party controlled cities.
Number of mass public shootings in 2019?
6
Over 10,000 other murders that year…
Democrats are the real problem, not our gun laws, gun owners or guns.
I honestly HATE IT that I can't take my gun with me when I go to Detroit. I take my $2000 ebike to Detroit and ride around Belle Isle and the river front. It's amazing. But go 1 block over and you could get Ebike Jacked.Or because most people who have legal carry permits don't carry them into places that restrict the action.
In NYC a law abiding citizen needs to pay $480 for a permit to own a gun.But it wouldn't surprise me if the Supreme Court said forcing someone to take a class or pay money to exercise their constitutional rights is unconstitutional.
This is true. East Jefferson, et al is a shit hole.I honestly HATE IT that I can't take my gun with me when I go to Detroit. I take my $2000 ebike to Detroit and ride around Belle Isle and the river front. It's amazing. But go 1 block over and you could get Ebike Jacked.
With the new Supreme Court, they will deem that unconstitutional. It depends on the way you interpret things.In NYC a law abiding citizen needs to pay $480 for a permit to own a gun.
For each gun he owns.
Why would this NOT be unconstitutional?
Rightfully so.With the new Supreme Court, they will deem that unconstitutional.
East Jefferson is not all shit hole. There are a lot of restaurants and people down at the river front. Just don't go too many blocks overThis is true. East Jefferson, et al is a shit hole.
Fotunatly my OH permit is good in MI.
How about unhinged cons who go around shooting people because they believe like you do? They aren't a problem?
It's not just Democrats. I was watching a show about an Alaskan serial killer. The Alaska Supreme Court isn't liberal is it? They let him walk.
And what about in Texas? A RED state.
A 3G offense is a special category of felony offenses in Texas that requires a person serve at least half of their prison sentence before becoming eligible for parole.
List of 3G Offenses in Texas
3G offenses are considered to be the most serious or violent, which is why they are punished more harshly. 3G offenses were formerly listed in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in Article 42.12 Section 3g (which is why they are called “3G”), but they are now codified under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 42A.054 and include:
- Murder
- Capital murder
- Indecency with a child
- Aggravated kidnapping
- Aggravated sexual assault
- Aggravated robbery
- Drug cases where a child is used in the commission of the offense, or the offense took place within 1,000 feet of a school or on a school bus.
- Sexual assault
- Injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual, if the offense is punishable as a felony of the first degree
- Sexual performance by a child
- Criminal solicitation cases that are punishable as a felony of the first degree
- Compelling prostitution
- Trafficking of persons
- Burglary of a Habitation
- Any felony where a deadly weapon is used or exhibited during the commission or flight from a crime.
So why does Texas let out violent criminals when they only served half their time?
Texas is a Red state. This is a Texas law. The STATE of Texas. No need to track down cities because this is a State of Texas thing.It's not just Democrats. I was watching a show about an Alaskan serial killer. The Alaska Supreme Court isn't liberal is it? They let him walk.
And what about in Texas? A RED state.
A 3G offense is a special category of felony offenses in Texas that requires a person serve at least half of their prison sentence before becoming eligible for parole.
List of 3G Offenses in Texas
3G offenses are considered to be the most serious or violent, which is why they are punished more harshly. 3G offenses were formerly listed in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in Article 42.12 Section 3g (which is why they are called “3G”), but they are now codified under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 42A.054 and include:
- Murder
- Capital murder
- Indecency with a child
- Aggravated kidnapping
- Aggravated sexual assault
- Aggravated robbery
- Drug cases where a child is used in the commission of the offense, or the offense took place within 1,000 feet of a school or on a school bus.
- Sexual assault
- Injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual, if the offense is punishable as a felony of the first degree
- Sexual performance by a child
- Criminal solicitation cases that are punishable as a felony of the first degree
- Compelling prostitution
- Trafficking of persons
- Burglary of a Habitation
- Any felony where a deadly weapon is used or exhibited during the commission or flight from a crime.
So why does Texas let out violent criminals when they only served half their time?