protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,175
- 18,365
- 2,250
Name one thing that Pamela Geller has ever said that is improper in any way (with a link to it)[/QUOTE]
Remember, anyone can be both supported or opposed on Fox, which unlike many left-wing media, Fox has both conservatives and many liberals on its broadcasts.
2. As I suspected, the left-biased Think Progress article is as laughable as hte Media Matters one, It smears Geller as a > "leading conservative to rationalize Breivik’s beliefs and actions" Not hardly. Simply characterizing the Norwegian Labour Party summer youth camp as an anti-Israel “indoctrination training center.” is not equivalent to excusing Brevik's mass murders as OK, in any way at all. Maybe the youth camp WAS or IS an anti-Israel “indoctrination training center". Still, this isn't a support of Brevik, it's just an analysis of the camp. Think Progress has made a ridiculous stretch here, and a big one. Likewise, TP ASKS a QUESTION about IF Geller might have communicated with Breivik in the past. Then they proceed talking as if she did that, when even they (Lee Fang who wrote the drivel), just admitted they are only speculating. Nothing here at all.
3. Banning Islam, demolishing mosques, and mass deportations of citizens (who are jihadist-connected) are all things I advocate every day on USMB. In fact, Islam is ALREADY banned by the US Constitution (Article 6 Section 2, the Supremacy Clause) by virtue of its supremacism. This simply (like much of immigration law) is a law that has never been enforced. If it was, all the mosques you mention, would never have been built, and of course they should all be demolished, or at least cease to function as Islamic (no reason to demolish perfectly good buildings). I have often suggested that the mosques could be converted to homeless shelters rt animal shelters. I have also advocated for Operation Wetback II, which although that doesn not involve "citizens", it is a support of mass deportation, and I also would mass deport any immigrants who have become citizens if they pose a threat to America.
4. As I suspected, your link to Islamaphobia Today does not have Pamela Geller advocating "killing any who protest" Those were not Pamela Geller's words, but were only a reference to a blog called The Muslim Issue, which even the Islamaphobia Today author admits he is only SUBJECTIVELY characterizing Geller, by his use of the words "evident approval". Oh "evident" ? Evident to whom ? To the Islamaphobia Today author, that's who. Again, > doesn't fly. Not even close.
5. Because of the long history and brutal belligerence of Islam (the Koran), and Muslims' inability to reform the Koran (they believe to be the word of God), it is quite apparent that Pamela's Geller's suggestions of deportation of Muslims is correct. I am not totally sure of the political standing of Islam in the UK, but in the USA, Islam is 100% unconstitutional and illegal by US Codes 2384 and 2385, as well as scores of US laws ex Koran 4:34 advocating wife-beating) If Muslims were mass deported, it would simply be a fixing of a major wrong that was allowed to continue far too long.
1. The subway ads you refer to in your laughable media matters link, are correct, as is the word "savage" which I use every day, to describe the uncivilized , barbaric savages of Muslim jihad. Also laughable is to describe Fox News as an opponent of Pamela Geller. She was on a few of their shows today, and was highly supported, including the Hannity show, which she is on, and being fully supported right now, as I type.Her subway ads.
Her defense (even approval) of Anders Breivik.
She advocates banning Islam, demolishing mosques, mass deportations of citizens, and killing any who protest:
If a government wants to learn how to manage growing Islamic problems, take some advice from Ottoman army officer Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk abolished Islam by putting a complete ban on Islamic materials, demolishing mosques, and removing any traces of Islam in his country to get rid of the evil. Those who tried to revolt were put in their place, or basically killed….
It is time for the UK to stop wasting their military abroad, but bring them to patrol their own streets and begin to remove Muslims. And it is vital time to plan and arrange deportation programs – and even arrange new deportation programs for practicing Muslims born in England to be deported to their parent’s country of origin.
That's not even including her out right looney fabrications and conspiracy theories.
Remember, anyone can be both supported or opposed on Fox, which unlike many left-wing media, Fox has both conservatives and many liberals on its broadcasts.
2. As I suspected, the left-biased Think Progress article is as laughable as hte Media Matters one, It smears Geller as a > "leading conservative to rationalize Breivik’s beliefs and actions" Not hardly. Simply characterizing the Norwegian Labour Party summer youth camp as an anti-Israel “indoctrination training center.” is not equivalent to excusing Brevik's mass murders as OK, in any way at all. Maybe the youth camp WAS or IS an anti-Israel “indoctrination training center". Still, this isn't a support of Brevik, it's just an analysis of the camp. Think Progress has made a ridiculous stretch here, and a big one. Likewise, TP ASKS a QUESTION about IF Geller might have communicated with Breivik in the past. Then they proceed talking as if she did that, when even they (Lee Fang who wrote the drivel), just admitted they are only speculating. Nothing here at all.
3. Banning Islam, demolishing mosques, and mass deportations of citizens (who are jihadist-connected) are all things I advocate every day on USMB. In fact, Islam is ALREADY banned by the US Constitution (Article 6 Section 2, the Supremacy Clause) by virtue of its supremacism. This simply (like much of immigration law) is a law that has never been enforced. If it was, all the mosques you mention, would never have been built, and of course they should all be demolished, or at least cease to function as Islamic (no reason to demolish perfectly good buildings). I have often suggested that the mosques could be converted to homeless shelters rt animal shelters. I have also advocated for Operation Wetback II, which although that doesn not involve "citizens", it is a support of mass deportation, and I also would mass deport any immigrants who have become citizens if they pose a threat to America.
4. As I suspected, your link to Islamaphobia Today does not have Pamela Geller advocating "killing any who protest" Those were not Pamela Geller's words, but were only a reference to a blog called The Muslim Issue, which even the Islamaphobia Today author admits he is only SUBJECTIVELY characterizing Geller, by his use of the words "evident approval". Oh "evident" ? Evident to whom ? To the Islamaphobia Today author, that's who. Again, > doesn't fly. Not even close.
5. Because of the long history and brutal belligerence of Islam (the Koran), and Muslims' inability to reform the Koran (they believe to be the word of God), it is quite apparent that Pamela's Geller's suggestions of deportation of Muslims is correct. I am not totally sure of the political standing of Islam in the UK, but in the USA, Islam is 100% unconstitutional and illegal by US Codes 2384 and 2385, as well as scores of US laws ex Koran 4:34 advocating wife-beating) If Muslims were mass deported, it would simply be a fixing of a major wrong that was allowed to continue far too long.
Last edited: