Anti-PC people making a mistake on the Duck Dynasty story

[JoeB131]

...your bigotry is A-Okay and don't let anyone tell you differently...

Hey, there's that word again.

Come on, Joe, back it up.

Does anyone want to help Joe?

.

Hey, guy, I know that you are terribly upset you can't talk about "those people" without shouting you down.

How about giving us the example of "Political Correctness" you keep whining about.

 

[SwimExpert]

Your unwillingness to put your own position and arguments into clear and precise terms shows that you have no interest in having an honest conversation in the first place. Your entire purpose here is to use simplistic and inflammatory rhetoric to invoke outrage. Outrage without any direction. And seemingly in hopes that it will simply latch on to the most readily available target, i.e. the current Duck Dynasty fiasco.

It's not difficult to find my specific opinions at all. I'm usually pretty specific and clear.

That is, for those who have even an ounce of curiosity.

.

Deflection noted.

 

[Mac1958]

...your bigotry is A-Okay and don't let anyone tell you differently...

Hey, there's that word again.

Come on, Joe, back it up.

Does anyone want to help Joe?

.

Hey, guy, I know that you are terribly upset you can't talk about "those people" without shouting you down.

How about giving us the example of "Political Correctness" you keep whining about.

Which people, Joe?

Are you EVER going to give me a straight answer, just once?

And haven't you learned yet that you can't put me on the defensive?


Okay, Joe, I'll even try to help.

Against whom am I bigoted?

.

 

[beagle9]

[q

That's "caricature" Joe.

Just like with Fox's thread, we have idiots who are missing the point entirely. Namely you. You call everyone bigots, and give flimsy reasons why. Why are we all bigots, Joe?

You mean other than your crazy hatred of how other people are having sex?

Seriously. How does that effect your life in any way shape or form?

People don't choose to be gay any more than they choose to be black.

Therefore, screaming about how they are "oppressing" Duck Bigot when they call him out on his vile language isn't oppressing him, and it isn't "Political Correctness". It's calling a wrong a wrong.

What part of them asking the man his opinion don't you understand here ? Why isn't the idiots instead going after GQ ? They were the ones exposing the gay's to other peoples beliefs within a public forum... Hmmm, or were they as a group together with GQ in the attempt to set the Dynasty up ?

 

[WelfareQueen]

You need to define "PC police." Because otherwise, you're being overly vague, to the point of meaninglessness.

I don't have to do anything.

If you're going to pretend that you don't know what I'm talking about, I very much doubt that it will possible to have an honest conversation with you.

.

You're the one who is complaining about hypocrisy, but only when SOME people do a certain thing. The reason I asked that question is because I was trying to give you an out. This "PC police" group you speak of is undefined. You can easily be using it to reference SOME people who do what you are complaining about, while excluding others who do the same thing. In fact, as far as I can tell, that's exactly what you are doing.

Your unwillingness to put your own position and arguments into clear and precise terms shows that you have no interest in having an honest conversation in the first place. Your entire purpose here is to use simplistic and inflammatory rhetoric to invoke outrage. Outrage without any direction. And seemingly in hopes that it will simply latch on to the most readily available target, i.e. the current Duck Dynasty fiasco.

This is Mac's thread...but here is my take.


Political correctness is the polar opposite of true free speech. It seeks to silence people and shut down genuine discussion. It is the opposite of honesty and truth. It distorts, obfuscates, and lies. It hurts people.

Does that clear it up for ya?

 

[JoeB131]

Hey, there's that word again.

Come on, Joe, back it up.

Does anyone want to help Joe?

.

Hey, guy, I know that you are terribly upset you can't talk about "those people" without shouting you down.

How about giving us the example of "Political Correctness" you keep whining about.

Which people, Joe?

Are you EVER going to give me a straight answer, just once?

And haven't you learned yet that you can't put me on the defensive?


Okay, Joe, I'll even try to help.

Against whom am I bigoted?

.

Guy, I don't know what your problem is these days. Before the election, you were actually pretty reasonable.

But, man, you've gone off on this PC schtick, you kind of sound like a guy who made an off-color comment and got dragged down to HR for it.

 

[Mac1958]

.

He won't answer me.

Heh.

.

 

[beagle9]

Your unwillingness to put your own position and arguments into clear and precise terms shows that you have no interest in having an honest conversation in the first place. Your entire purpose here is to use simplistic and inflammatory rhetoric to invoke outrage. Outrage without any direction. And seemingly in hopes that it will simply latch on to the most readily available target, i.e. the current Duck Dynasty fiasco.

It's not difficult to find my specific opinions at all. I'm usually pretty specific and clear.

That is, for those who have even an ounce of curiosity.

.

Deflection noted.

Deflection noted.

 

[JoeB131]

Your unwillingness to put your own position and arguments into clear and precise terms shows that you have no interest in having an honest conversation in the first place. Your entire purpose here is to use simplistic and inflammatory rhetoric to invoke outrage. Outrage without any direction. And seemingly in hopes that it will simply latch on to the most readily available target, i.e. the current Duck Dynasty fiasco.

It's not difficult to find my specific opinions at all. I'm usually pretty specific and clear.

That is, for those who have even an ounce of curiosity.

.

Deflection noted.

He does that a lot.

 

[rightwinger]

Or maybe we just refuse to believe in a God who would burn people FOR ALL ETERNITY because of who they chose to love?

The real problem you Christians have is that you've Disneyfied your diety. The God of the Bible really is a horrible monster and I rejoice at his non-existence.

But every once in a while, some of you actually embrace the suck to try to use the bible to rationalize your bad behavior.

Just like the misogynists who burned "witches" and racists who whipped slaves, because the bible told them so.

What you guys are really mourning is that when you behave badly, and hold up the bible, good hearted people are saying, "Not a good enough reason". As they should.

Shit, even Pope Francis is saying "Lay off the gay stuff!"

Jesus would not treat gays the way fundamentalist Christians do

Jesus was Love and mercy yes, and yet he knows sin also, and he knows about it's origins. He was not for gay sex, just as his father wasn't either. It is written, and it is SIN.

Jesus loveth the sinner, but not the sin. Remember that.

You try and use Jesus as if to confuse someone with him, but he is not to be used in this way, so all I see in you is fail when it comes to your wild ideas on these sorts of things in which you try and pull off against the weak minded, but I don't see the weak minded that you seek to confuse here, so your efforts are futile really.

Jesus would not call someone a fag

 

[rightwinger]

A tribute to your stupidity....and others as well

Minority claims the majority is stupid

Last vestige of a loser

Check Obabble's poll numbers...then tell me who was stupid.

I've also checked the numbers for Republicans and especially conservatives

They only wish they were as high as our presidents

 

[WelfareQueen]

[q

That's "caricature" Joe.

Just like with Fox's thread, we have idiots who are missing the point entirely. Namely you. You call everyone bigots, and give flimsy reasons why. Why are we all bigots, Joe?

You mean other than your crazy hatred of how other people are having sex?

Seriously. How does that effect your life in any way shape or form?

People don't choose to be gay any more than they choose to be black.

Therefore, screaming about how they are "oppressing" Duck Bigot when they call him out on his vile language isn't oppressing him, and it isn't "Political Correctness". It's calling a wrong a wrong.

GLAAD said they wanted to punish him and silence him. That is almost the precise definition of oppression. He is being deprived of his income and living for expressing his views. That is oppression.

Disagreement is fine...but this is not about genuine disagreement. This is about silencing someone because their views differ from yours. That is the problem.

 

[plant]

I really get a kick outta you fox brain washed rednecks . Fox says hitch your wagon on this outrage you dumb fucks not only hitch your wagons you re re's circle the fuckers . Talk about doubling down on dumb !!!! The dumb ass broke company rules & got repramanded !!!

 

[beagle9]

Jesus would not treat gays the way fundamentalist Christians do

Jesus was Love and mercy yes, and yet he knows sin also, and he knows about it's origins. He was not for gay sex, just as his father wasn't either. It is written, and it is SIN.

Jesus loveth the sinner, but not the sin. Remember that.

You try and use Jesus as if to confuse someone with him, but he is not to be used in this way, so all I see in you is fail when it comes to your wild ideas on these sorts of things in which you try and pull off against the weak minded, but I don't see the weak minded that you seek to confuse here, so your efforts are futile really.

Jesus would not call someone a fag

Re-read is all I can say to you, because you undoubtedly are the weak minded here.

 

[beagle9]

I really get a kick outta you fox brain washed rednecks . Fox says hitch your wagon on this outrage you dumb fucks not only hitch your wagons you re re's circle the fuckers . Talk about doubling down on dumb !!!! The dumb ass broke company rules & got repramanded !!!

You losing your cool by cursing like a sailor now, just speaks multitudes about you and your losing this conversation now.

 

[JoeB131]

GLAAD said they wanted to punish him and silence him. That is almost the precise definition of oppression. He is being deprived of his income and living for expressing his views. That is oppression.

Disagreement is fine...but this is not about genuine disagreement. This is about silencing someone because their views differ from yours. That is the problem.

No, it's not a problem at all.

The homophobes really do need to shut the fuck up and go away.

But that's not even what GLAAD did. GLAAD merely asked A&E if they stood behind what this guy said. Not just about gays but about blacks as well.

And A&E, having been dealing with this guy for years, no doubt having left hundreds of hours of off-color comments on the editing room floor, decided that they didn't want to be left hanging in the wind when other things started coming out of the woodwork.

 

[TemplarKormac]

...your bigotry is A-Okay and don't let anyone tell you differently...

Hey, there's that word again.

Come on, Joe, back it up.

Does anyone want to help Joe?

.

Hey, guy, I know that you are terribly upset you can't talk about "those people" without shouting you down.

How about giving us the example of "Political Correctness" you keep whining about.

Duck Dynasty.

Good enough for you? Apparently not, since you're willing to ignore the obvious example of it.

Here's a few others:

Army: Don't say Christmas | Fox News

'Holiday' trees offend the religious and the secular: Column

Rodeo clowns asked to take 'sensitivity training' - Washington Times

Seattle officials call for ban on 'potentially offensive' language | Fox News

Florida Officer Fired After Calling Trayvon Martin a 'Thug' on Facebook | Video | TheBlaze.com

Interior Secretary: I don't want any climate-change deniers in my department | WashingtonExaminer.com

Physics prof a victim of 'double standard' in academia

Gospel singer: I was "asked not to attend" my own concert

US Lawmaker Calls for Olympic Gay Rainbow Flag Parade to "Embarrass" Putin | World | RIA Novosti

Cali. governor signs transgendered students' rights bill | The Daily Caller

Pornography at San Francisco library prompts privacy screens | Fox News

School Orders Child To Remove God From Poem | Fox News

Track Team Disqualified For Thanking God | Fox News

School Calls Cops on Gideons Distributing Bibles - Todd Starnes - Page 1

Police Chaplains Told To stop Invoking Jesus

New Army Manual Orders Soldiers Not To Criticize Taliban | Judicial Watch

Pepsi Settles EEOC Racial Bias Case for $3.1 Million - In House

Care to deny what is clearly there, Joe?

 

[WelfareQueen]

GLAAD said they wanted to punish him and silence him. That is almost the precise definition of oppression. He is being deprived of his income and living for expressing his views. That is oppression.

Disagreement is fine...but this is not about genuine disagreement. This is about silencing someone because their views differ from yours. That is the problem.

No, it's not a problem at all.

The homophobes really do need to shut the fuck up and go away.

But that's not even what GLAAD did. GLAAD merely asked A&E if they stood behind what this guy said. Not just about gays but about blacks as well.

And A&E, having been dealing with this guy for years, no doubt having left hundreds of hours of off-color comments on the editing room floor, decided that they didn't want to be left hanging in the wind when other things started coming out of the woodwork.

Wrong.


I saw an interview on CNN with a GLAAD spokesman. "We want to punish him," is a direct quote.

 

[rightwinger]

GLAAD said they wanted to punish him and silence him. That is almost the precise definition of oppression. He is being deprived of his income and living for expressing his views. That is oppression.

Disagreement is fine...but this is not about genuine disagreement. This is about silencing someone because their views differ from yours. That is the problem.

No, it's not a problem at all.

The homophobes really do need to shut the fuck up and go away.

But that's not even what GLAAD did. GLAAD merely asked A&E if they stood behind what this guy said. Not just about gays but about blacks as well.

And A&E, having been dealing with this guy for years, no doubt having left hundreds of hours of off-color comments on the editing room floor, decided that they didn't want to be left hanging in the wind when other things started coming out of the woodwork.

Wrong.


I saw an interview on CNN with a GLAAD spokesman. "We want to punish him," is a direct quote.

Sent to bed without his supper?

 

[Katzndogz]

[q

That's "caricature" Joe.

Just like with Fox's thread, we have idiots who are missing the point entirely. Namely you. You call everyone bigots, and give flimsy reasons why. Why are we all bigots, Joe?

You mean other than your crazy hatred of how other people are having sex?

Seriously. How does that effect your life in any way shape or form?

People don't choose to be gay any more than they choose to be black.

Therefore, screaming about how they are "oppressing" Duck Bigot when they call him out on his vile language isn't oppressing him, and it isn't "Political Correctness". It's calling a wrong a wrong.

Truth isn't vile language it's just truth.