harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,017
- 2,300
easy to say and do if you don't live :I'm a ''realist''---I believe in evolution = humans =hate/greedy/jealous/angry/murder/rape/robe/etc --these are all ''natural'' to humansProbably because it makes no sense to deny the science like you are doing......where do you people get the ''scare'' word from?? you don't have anything else, so you use that ..they use it in the race threadsSo the universe having a beginning scares you
....you make no sense and are just pulling crap out of the air--if anyone should be scared of no beginning, it would be you people
Here ding and harmonica
This is what I mean by slamming people for not interpreting science the same way.
Nobody has to believe the science, but should be free to come about understanding by their own choice of process.
If harmonica doesn't respond to that approach, why not work differently that is more effective?
For example, I am curious what is the equivalent in harmonica's way of defining relations in the world
of the COLLECTIVE level of existence, of laws or truth, of humanity or society?
harmonica: what do you call or consider the highest level of goodness, of truth, or
aspirations you strive for personally and you think is best for humanity?
Do you look at loving relations and world peace and cooperation as the ideal for the world at large?
Do you believe striving for TRUTH and removing all error and stupid ignorance is your motivation
you wish all people would agree to follow as well?
How do YOU describe the ideal good to make society better for everyone? Can we start there?
Thank you!
[PS if that doesn't work harmonica let's start from the opposite approach:
what do you find to be the ultimate cause of EVIL in the world.
what do all humans need to address to solve the worst problems facing humanity.
and how do you feel is the best way to go about addressing and solving this problem,
where if EVERYONE did that, the world would be a better place. How do you define this?]
wars--there always have been wars and always will be
...I am like my father--he ''indirectly'' taught me to be nice to people..be polite...etc ...don't be mean ....
....evolution- realism= .....if the human child--especially males--don't get love/discipline/etc, they more than likely will grow up to be jackasses.....a lot of how human behaviour is determined is by their socioeconomic/familial upbringing/etc
example:
..if you and I were born in Somalia, we would probably need to steal/use violence/etc
..we see ''a lot'' hate/greed/jealousy/etc in the news--but this is not all that is out there
= I don't see it as bad or good---but more like humans doing what's ''natural''
Dear harmonica
The difference I guess is where we believe human beings are
in the process of development and social evolution.
I believe the phase of retributive justice is like the
teenage vs. parent phase of rebellion and learning
there are consequences for breaking rules (before
progressing to the restorative justice approach to relations).
The point is not to stay in this phase of depending on
parental authority to stay orderly (instead of the selfish
greedy destructive side of human beings which I equate
to immature children wanting everything their way).
The "church" role is like the collective "mother" or nurturing side of parenting.
the "state" role is more like the collective "father" or
disciplinary authoritarian role of governing and protecting the
household.
the point is not to stay dependent on either church or state
to act as our parents to run to. We are supposed to grow to
become independent households, or collectively independent
nations of self-governing city-states when we reach full maturity.
That's how I see the NATURAL process developing.
Society collectively REFLECTS the same patterns we see
from infants and "terrible two's" progressing to rebellious
teenagers before becoming adults able to govern our own
decisions by REASON not by fear-based punishment or
"spankings" as with small children who respond emotionally.
When we reach maturity, we are supposed to gain enough
experience to learn by trial and error, the consequences of
destructive vs. productive approaches, and what is more
effective, sustainable and healthful. So that's how I see
where we are, is in various stages of development.
I do believe this is natural, I believe we learn by REASON
and we have free will for a purpose, so we study problems
and figure out solutions by the "scientific approach."
Where the "spiritual" level or process applies, the more
we FORGIVE and let go of personal biases and reactions
in response to conflicts with other people, this has the effect
of opening up our minds and intuition to solve problems in a
more "holistic" manner connecting with other people. There
is a SCIENCE to this process, it is NATURAL. But because of
the collective influence that people have on each other, this
level of shared energy and insights including on a subconscious
level is what the SPIRITUAL references and terms are used
to describe the RELATIONSHIPS between "individual and collective"
levels of society and knowledge of the laws we consider to be truth.
This is where the faith based beliefs and perceptions come in.
However you explain the process or connection between
the INDIVIDUAL and the COLLECTIVE consciousness or
knowledge shared with "other people" that is where people
use Religious symbolism to represent this more abstract,
intangible realm. And because it is on an unconscious or
invisible level of thoughts of different people influencing each other
indirectly, that's where it becomes "faith based."
Whether we "trust" other people or not, or we can "forgive"
faults conflicts or wrongs between people, this is the level
where we make those assessments, so it is faith based,
and it affects our PERCEPTIONS and biases. Whether
we look at things in a secular way, or in spiritual terms as
in religion, the PERCEPTION we have as individuals
is biased by what we can forgive or not, and to what
degree we can include or we reject. Some people call this
fear response, but I have found it is based on past issues
and the degree to which we forgive and resolve them,
which determines how much we bias our perception of all
things whether real or imagined.
There is a science to this perception business as well.
Totally possible to resolve different ways of expression
the same process by taking a natural secular approach.
You do not have to use religious or spiritual terms for it.
And it's still the same process of people reconciling
between each other and individuals vs. the collective level.
in the ghetto
poor
without parents
without a father
......with a father who is abusive/alcoholic/druggie [ the kid that just shot up the school had an idiot druggie/etc for a father ]
Trans STEM School Shooting Suspect's Father Alleged Felonjailed for domestic violence and deported twice back to Mexico.
without being bullied at school for being:
----dumb/different/etc
...etc
.....there are poor/dumb/different/mentally challenged/etc people all over--and always will be
....there are ''normal'' people that grow up with a great childhood that have high IQs-----------teachers at universities--- that are serial killers
11 Terrifying Murderers Who Used Their Genius-Level IQs To Kill People
this is what humans are