Appeals Court Rules in Favor of DoJ to Allow Govt to Continue Using Documents Seized from Mar-A-Lago

[BlindBoo]

Prove it.

In a May 31 post on his blog shortly after George Floyd’s death, he wrote, “Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not.”

At a speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on June 2, he said, “There’s no place for violence, no place for looting or destroying property or burning churches or destroying businesses […] we need to distinguish between legitimate peaceful protest and opportunistic violent destruction”

Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned violent protests in the last three months

Tens of thousands of social media users are posting memes that claim that Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden, has been silent for over three months on the issues of rioting and violence and has only just denounced them because of a dip in the polls. This claim is false: Joe Biden has...

www.reuters.com

 

[Catsnmeters]

In other words, I am a "Dirty Joo" a problem that requires a final solution that only The DemNazi Fascist Left can provide, right my little Hitler?

Do you support the constitution?

 

[Aldo Raine]

Putting Trump in a cage and locking it is a great way to protect him!

No argument from me but I think we all know the politically and financially elite do not face the same justice system the rest of us do.
MAGA

 

[bripat9643]

In a May 31 post on his blog shortly after George Floyd’s death, he wrote, “Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not.”

At a speech in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on June 2, he said, “There’s no place for violence, no place for looting or destroying property or burning churches or destroying businesses […] we need to distinguish between legitimate peaceful protest and opportunistic violent destruction”

Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned violent protests in the last three months

Tens of thousands of social media users are posting memes that claim that Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden, has been silent for over three months on the issues of rioting and violence and has only just denounced them because of a dip in the polls. This claim is false: Joe Biden has...

www.reuters.com

When did he specifically condemn BLM and Antifa?

 

[bripat9643]

No argument from me but I think we all know the politically and financially elite do not face the same justice system the rest of us do.
MAGA

You mean like Hillary Clinton, George Soros and Jim Comey?

 

[Skylar]

Well... the Federal government won its appeal and can continue to use the documents and materials seized in the Mar-A-Lago raid...

Government Wins Appeal on Mar-a-Lago Classified Documents

Between this new ruling, and the Special Master ( Trump appointees in both cases) calling Rump's bluff with respect to de-classification...

Not to mention the NY AG filing a mega-suit against the Donald and his grown kids involved in the Family Business...

Looks like Donald has lost this week... Bigly...

Well of course they did. Unanimously. Cannon's ruling was pseudo-legal dogshit that was an embarrassment. Even Trump's lapdog William Barr dismissed her ruling as blithering nonsense. The DOJ had already reviewed the docs. What possible benefit would be offered for a special master at that point?

Every accusation by Trump supporters is a confession. And their snivelling about partisan judges is a confession that they want judges that ignore the law and benefit them.

 

[JimH52]

Another win for the good guys.

trump likes to lose.

 

[JimH52]

I have not seen that reported but if it's accurate that is a stunner

Cannon is MAGA.

 

[Indeependent]

Well of course they did. Unanimously. Cannon's ruling was pseudo-legal dogshit that was an embarrassment. Even Trump's lapdog William Barr dismissed her ruling as blithering nonsense. The DOJ had already reviewed the docs. What possible benefit would be offered for a special master at that point?

Every accusation by Trump supporters is a confession. And their snivelling about partisan judges is a confession that they want judges that ignore the law and benefit them.

The DOJ examined 11,000 documents?
You are an idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

Cannon is MAGA.

And you're retarded.

 

[Skylar]

The DOJ examined 11,000 documents?
You are an idiot.

Yup, they reviewed them all. They had teams working on it for 3 WEEKS before Trump's idiot legal team even thought to ask for a special master.

Justice Department says it has already reviewed seized documents after Trump asks for special master examination

Remember, just because you have no idea what you're talking about doesn't mean I'm similarly encumbered.

 

[bripat9643]

Yup, they reviewed them all. They had teams working on it for 3 WEEKS before Trump's idiot legal team even thought to ask for a special master.

Justice Department says it has already reviewed seized documents after Trump asks for special master examination​

You clam we're supposed to believe anything the FBI says?

 

[Skylar]

You clam we're supposed to believe anything the FBI says?

Laughing......so when your conspiracies can't measure up, attack the measuring stick, huh. Ah, the favorite of Truthers, Flat Earthers, Birthers and Big Liars.

Who is a more reliable source on what documents the FBI has reviewed.....than the FBI?

Let me guess.....you, quoting yourself?

 

[Indeependent]

Yup, they reviewed them all. They had teams working on it for 3 WEEKS before Trump's idiot legal team even thought to ask for a special master.

Justice Department says it has already reviewed seized documents after Trump asks for special master examination

Remember, just because you have no idea what you're talking about doesn't mean I'm similarly encumbered.

I'm sure!

 

[bripat9643]

Laughing......so when your conspiracies can't measure up, attack the measuring stick, huh. Ah, the favorite of Truthers, Flat Earthers, Birthers and Big Liars.

Who is a more reliable source on what documents the FBI has reviewed.....than the FBI?

Let me guess.....you, quoting yourself?

The FBI is not any kind of a measuring stick. It's a puddle of sleaze and corruption. It's the contesting party's notoriously corrupt gang of thugs.

 

[Skylar]

The FBI is not any kind of a measuring stick. It's a puddle of sleaze and corruption. It's the contesting party's notoriously corrupt gang of thugs.

Then give us a better source on what documents have been reviewed by the FBI......than the FBI.

I've got popcorn and a comfortable chair. Don't feel rushed.

 

[Indeependent]

Then give us a better source on what documents have been reviewed by the FBI......than the FBI.

I've got popcorn and a comfortable chair. Don't feel rushed.

The same DOJ and FBI that said they lost all the 9/11 evidence a few months back?
Yep...that DOJ and FBI.

 

[Blaster]

Cannon is MAGA.

Link?

 

[bripat9643]

Then give us a better source on what documents have been reviewed by the FBI......than the FBI.

I've got popcorn and a comfortable chair. Don't feel rushed.

We don' t have any other source. That doesn't mean you get to use whichever one you prefer. That's one big problem with this whole mess. It depends on trusting the FBI, and they have proven they can't be trusted.

 

[Skylar]

The same DOJ and FBI that said they lost all the 9/11 evidence a few months back?
Yep...that DOJ and FBI.

And your better source on what documents the DOJ has reviewed is.....?

So far the best you've been able to manage is to quote yourself.

Your source is insufficient to carry your argument. Is that it?