Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What legal doctrine empowers government to override the 1st?Then the government cannot prohibit you from yelling "Fire" in a crowded theatre or punish you for doing so?
Overriding public safety or public order? Each such order should stipulate the statute being invoked, yes?What legal doctrine empowers government to override the 1st?
Of couse they should….but do they?Overriding public safety or public order? Each such order should stipulate the statute being invoked, yes?
I don't know... I've never seen the details of a gag-order, nor been privy to the courtroom verbal chatter revolving around one.Of couse they should….but do they?
Doubtful... but I would venture a guess that there exists statute allowing such censorship under specific conditions.Is there such a statute….one which grants government the right to shit all over our 1A right at will?
Sounds like a fun research project for you.I know they do it, I just don’t believe they do it legally.
All of you people talking about "fire" in a theater need to understand what that actually is. It is called "imminent lawless action" that was CREATED by the SC in the sixties. They just created that out of thin air. And if you were to do that, and get arrested for various state and local laws like domestic disturbance etc, the prosecution would have to prove intent, imminence and likelihood.
Just like they CREATED that it was ok to jail American citizens for their eye slant.
The constitution is what gives the government its power. It is explicit in that regard.
If people think so its so fucking important to have their rights trampled by a corrupt mass murdering group of lying assholes starving for power, pass an amendment.
We all know what you support, boot licker.So, here we are 30 pages and almost 600 responses and in the end a gag order is no different than pre-trail confinement for those deemed to big a danger to society to be let free awaiting trail.
Either support both, or attack both.
Notice you dont comment on the facts, just gas lighting for your daddy.
Notice you dont comment on the facts, just gas lighting for your daddy.
No wonder you are a boot licker. You are a complete moron.
thehill.com
No one cares about your fat orange obsession.Some view gag orders as violations of a person’s First Amendment rights, while others consider it helpful in ensuring a fair trial. The Supreme Court previously ruled that a gag order is constitutional if it can protect the right to a fair trial, is as least restrictive as possible, and will be effective, Yale Law School explains.
What is a gag order — and what happens if the gag order is violated?
A federal judge imposed a gag order against Trump on Monday — but what is it, and what happens if he violates it?
It's not that we don't all understand the desire by Trump sycophants to enable Dear Leader to intimidate jurors, grand jurors, clerks of the court, DA's, Special Counsel's, and judges. The last thing the sycophants (and Don) want is a fair trial.
Can you cease bowing to the Orange Shit Gibbon for ONE post?No one cares about your fat orange obsession.
I strictly asked for the TDSers to leave him at the door in the OP.Can you cease bowing to the Orange Shit Gibbon for ONE post?
If I were to guess what a Trump cultist would say after fomenting the false narrative that gag orders are unconstitutional..........your fatuous reply would be it.No one cares about your fat orange obsession.
