Are most people "sheeple".....?

[Mudda]

Why, is he your sheeple?

Probably more tech savy. Did the thread offend you in some way?

Who the fuck are you? Her bodyguard sheeple?

I'm the guy that pointed out the obvious. The word apparently bothers you.

You're a cocksucking idiot. Now you know.

Aw, did I hurt you feelings?

No, I'm used to having fools interrupt a conversation here with what they think is cleverness. YAWN!!!

 

[Iceweasel]

Probably more tech savy. Did the thread offend you in some way?

Who the fuck are you? Her bodyguard sheeple?

I'm the guy that pointed out the obvious. The word apparently bothers you.

You're a cocksucking idiot. Now you know.

Aw, did I hurt you feelings?

No, I'm used to having fools interrupt a conversation here with what they think is cleverness. YAWN!!!

That's how you "converse"?

 

[Mudda]

Who the fuck are you? Her bodyguard sheeple?

I'm the guy that pointed out the obvious. The word apparently bothers you.

You're a cocksucking idiot. Now you know.

Aw, did I hurt you feelings?

No, I'm used to having fools interrupt a conversation here with what they think is cleverness. YAWN!!!

That's how you "converse"?

More of your cleverness? Or just a blatant attempt to derail the thread?

 

[TNHarley]

Diamond and Silk: What the Democrats Don't Want You to Know | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[ChrisL]

Probably more tech savy. Did the thread offend you in some way?

Who the fuck are you? Her bodyguard sheeple?

I'm the guy that pointed out the obvious. The word apparently bothers you.

You're a cocksucking idiot. Now you know.

Aw, did I hurt you feelings?

No, I'm used to having fools interrupt a conversation here with what they think is cleverness. YAWN!!!

Bonzi has lots of "body guards" here apparently. That old lady knows how to turn on the dudes!!!

 

[Votto]

In the way of party alliance?
In the way of popular thought?
In the way of anything perceived "popular" or "normal"?

sheeple
people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

 

[ChrisL]

In the way of party alliance?
In the way of popular thought?
In the way of anything perceived "popular" or "normal"?

sheeple
people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

That is more about "organization" of government. You can't just have a free for all, you know.

 

[Bonzi]

In the way of party alliance?
In the way of popular thought?
In the way of anything perceived "popular" or "normal"?

sheeple
people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

Hmmm..... I think the tide is turning there..... there was a time political leaders (maybe?) represented the people well... now it's all about self interests and big business. Maybe it was all along..... but I think people either don't like it anymore or just don't care anymore......

 

[ChrisL]

No, choosing a political leader is not being a "sheeple." If you BELIEVE everything that your political leaders tell you and you tow their line (that goes for BOTH sides), then you can proudly call yourself a "sheeple." There are many here.

 

[ChrisL]

If you are going to fall in line behind your political leader and even when you find out that political leader has lied and been dishonest, you still support that leader, that would make you a sheeple. To constantly excuse their lies . . . sheeple.

 

[Votto]

In the way of party alliance?
In the way of popular thought?
In the way of anything perceived "popular" or "normal"?

sheeple
people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

That is more about "organization" of government. You can't just have a free for all, you know.

And apparently you can't have a limited government either.

People seem to have the need for others to protect them, from cradle to grave.

The irony here is, those that "protect" them are rapping them in the fields while fending off wolves. After a while they seem to like it and vote for more.

 

[ChrisL]

In the way of party alliance?
In the way of popular thought?
In the way of anything perceived "popular" or "normal"?

sheeple
people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

That is more about "organization" of government. You can't just have a free for all, you know.

And apparently you can't have a limited government either.

People seem to have the need for others to protect them, from cradle to grave.

The irony here is, those that "protect" them are rapping them in the fields while fending off wolves. After a while they seem to like it and vote for more.

Gotta keep a cap on poverty. That is the smart thing to do.

 

[Votto]

No, choosing a political leader is not being a "sheeple." If you BELIEVE everything that your political leaders tell you and you tow their line (that goes for BOTH sides), then you can proudly call yourself a "sheeple." There are many here.

Not so.

We need our political leaders to tell us what doctors to see, what teachers can teach, what kind of toilet we should buy, what is PC to say and think and what is not, what to drink, biggie soda's being the worst, how much money is too much money to make, how much money is not enough money to make per hour, what marriage should be and should not be, and the list goes on, essentially forever.

No, people are basically sheep unable to do the smallest of tasks on their own.

 

[Votto]

In the way of party alliance?
In the way of popular thought?
In the way of anything perceived "popular" or "normal"?

sheeple
people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

That is more about "organization" of government. You can't just have a free for all, you know.

And apparently you can't have a limited government either.

People seem to have the need for others to protect them, from cradle to grave.

The irony here is, those that "protect" them are rapping them in the fields while fending off wolves. After a while they seem to like it and vote for more.

Gotta keep a cap on poverty. That is the smart thing to do.

Sure. We need our leaders to keep a cap on pretty much everything. Only they have the wisdom and knowledge to tell us that the job making under minimum wage is not good enough for them, so they can't work it even though it is hurting no one at all.

In fact, they would rather see us without a job than have a job they have approved of us working.

 

[ChrisL]

No, choosing a political leader is not being a "sheeple." If you BELIEVE everything that your political leaders tell you and you tow their line (that goes for BOTH sides), then you can proudly call yourself a "sheeple." There are many here.

Not so.

We need our political leaders to tell us what doctors to see, what teachers can teach, what kind of toilet we should buy, what is PC to say and think and what is not, what to drink, biggie soda's being the worst, how much money is too much money to make, how much money is not enough money to make per hour, what marriage should be and should not be, and the list goes on, essentially forever.

No, people are basically sheep unable to do the smallest of tasks on their own.

You need governmental organization and yes, leadership. Anarchy is never a good thing. Lol. Those other things you mentioned is a sign of the government getting too big and powerful. However, businesses need to be regulated. That has been proven over and over and over again in the past.

 

[ChrisL]

In the way of party alliance?
In the way of popular thought?
In the way of anything perceived "popular" or "normal"?

sheeple
people compared to sheep in being docile, foolish, or easily led.

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

That is more about "organization" of government. You can't just have a free for all, you know.

And apparently you can't have a limited government either.

People seem to have the need for others to protect them, from cradle to grave.

The irony here is, those that "protect" them are rapping them in the fields while fending off wolves. After a while they seem to like it and vote for more.

Gotta keep a cap on poverty. That is the smart thing to do.

Sure. We need our leaders to keep a cap on pretty much everything. Only they have the wisdom and knowledge to tell us that the job making under minimum wage is not good enough for them, so they can't work it even though it is hurting no one at all.

In fact, they would rather see us without a job than have a job they have approved of us working.

Minimum wage is a good thing! These are all things for US, the people! Lol. These kinds of things are to benefit us so huge powerful corporations can't take advantage of us, like they do in other third world countries!

 

[Votto]

If people were not sheeple, they would not need political leaders.

They insist on political leaders.

That is more about "organization" of government. You can't just have a free for all, you know.

And apparently you can't have a limited government either.

People seem to have the need for others to protect them, from cradle to grave.

The irony here is, those that "protect" them are rapping them in the fields while fending off wolves. After a while they seem to like it and vote for more.

Gotta keep a cap on poverty. That is the smart thing to do.

Sure. We need our leaders to keep a cap on pretty much everything. Only they have the wisdom and knowledge to tell us that the job making under minimum wage is not good enough for them, so they can't work it even though it is hurting no one at all.

In fact, they would rather see us without a job than have a job they have approved of us working.

Minimum wage is a good thing! These are all things for US, the people! Lol. These kinds of things are to benefit us so huge powerful corporations can't take advantage of us, like they do in other third world countries!

How does the minimum wage help us specifically?

If I choose to work for under the minimum wage, who is hurt?

 

[Votto]

No, choosing a political leader is not being a "sheeple." If you BELIEVE everything that your political leaders tell you and you tow their line (that goes for BOTH sides), then you can proudly call yourself a "sheeple." There are many here.

Not so.

We need our political leaders to tell us what doctors to see, what teachers can teach, what kind of toilet we should buy, what is PC to say and think and what is not, what to drink, biggie soda's being the worst, how much money is too much money to make, how much money is not enough money to make per hour, what marriage should be and should not be, and the list goes on, essentially forever.

No, people are basically sheep unable to do the smallest of tasks on their own.

You need governmental organization and yes, leadership. Anarchy is never a good thing. Lol. Those other things you mentioned is a sign of the government getting too big and powerful. However, businesses need to be regulated. That has been proven over and over and over again in the past.

Maintaining law and order is one thing, but passing over 80,000 regulations and laws every year is another. Is soceity really that bad? More to the point, does it make it better?

Why is it anytime mentions limited government, which is merely maintaining law and order and letting people live their lives in peace, is met with accusations of wanting anarchy?

Very odd.

 

[ChrisL]

That is more about "organization" of government. You can't just have a free for all, you know.

And apparently you can't have a limited government either.

People seem to have the need for others to protect them, from cradle to grave.

The irony here is, those that "protect" them are rapping them in the fields while fending off wolves. After a while they seem to like it and vote for more.

Gotta keep a cap on poverty. That is the smart thing to do.

Sure. We need our leaders to keep a cap on pretty much everything. Only they have the wisdom and knowledge to tell us that the job making under minimum wage is not good enough for them, so they can't work it even though it is hurting no one at all.

In fact, they would rather see us without a job than have a job they have approved of us working.

Minimum wage is a good thing! These are all things for US, the people! Lol. These kinds of things are to benefit us so huge powerful corporations can't take advantage of us, like they do in other third world countries!

How does the minimum wage help us specifically?

If I choose to work for under the minimum wage, who is hurt?

You are, dummy! J/K, but not really.

 

[ChrisL]

No, choosing a political leader is not being a "sheeple." If you BELIEVE everything that your political leaders tell you and you tow their line (that goes for BOTH sides), then you can proudly call yourself a "sheeple." There are many here.

Not so.

We need our political leaders to tell us what doctors to see, what teachers can teach, what kind of toilet we should buy, what is PC to say and think and what is not, what to drink, biggie soda's being the worst, how much money is too much money to make, how much money is not enough money to make per hour, what marriage should be and should not be, and the list goes on, essentially forever.

No, people are basically sheep unable to do the smallest of tasks on their own.

You need governmental organization and yes, leadership. Anarchy is never a good thing. Lol. Those other things you mentioned is a sign of the government getting too big and powerful. However, businesses need to be regulated. That has been proven over and over and over again in the past.

Maintaining law and order is one thing, but passing over 80,000 regulations and laws every year is another. Is soceity really that bad? More to the point, does it make it better?

Why is it anytime mentions limited government, which is merely maintaining law and order and letting people live their lives in peace, is met with accusations of wanting anarchy?

Very odd.

I don't agree with every regulation and law. Don't get me wrong here. But some regulation and laws are certainly necessary.