Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 53,766
- 16,187
- 2,250
Nope. The latter is a tantrum. The pseudo-legal equivilant of overturning a chessboard because you don't like the outcome of the game.
The former is equal protection under the law. Its cheaper, faster, simpler, and far more effective. By every measure, it works better.
Nope. Gays already have equal protection under the law.
Gays do have equal protection under the law- they are going to court to enforce that protection where they are being illegally discriminated against.
Bottom line: Adam has no right to marry Steve. They both have dicks and therefore can't produce children. Such "marriages" are utterly pointless from the viewpoint of society.
You are not society. Bottom line is we all have a right to marry- and the courts have found repeatedly that Adam does have the right to marry Steve.
The courts are populated by political hacks put their to implement the leftwing agenda. Truth has nothing to do with with their decisions.
Or.....its not virtually the whole of the federal judiciary that's wrong.
Its just you.