🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Are today's Southern Conservatives any different than Southern Conservatives from the Civil War?

Still willing to throw themselves into the fray on behalf of the rich for empty promises of prosperity.

They've only changed political parties.
There you go again. The democrats remained democrats. The republicans have never been for slavery. That is controlling people against their will, which is big government. Big government is Democrat policy. You democrats are still the same, only your methods have changed. Blacks are still on the Democrat plantation.

More B.S. about Democrats keeping Blacks on the plantation. If you're sincere about this, then you are telling millions of Blacks who vote overwhelmingly Democrat, that they are too stupid to understand who their real enemy is. Reading the threads on these forums and any intelligent person soon finds out who the racists are and why Blacks continue voting Democrat. You say Republicans have never been for slavery? Not true if we include wage slavery, which Republicans overwhelmingly approve of. This means the Repub leadership as well as the wage slave conservative suckers making crap wages and waiting for that trickle down effect Reagan promised them over thirty years ago.
God damn you are an ignorant dumb fuck, those wages are never coming back asshole in this global economy, what the fuck dont you liberals understand about that? They pay you what you are worth. You motherfuckers would rather have no jobs, be slaves to the democrats, then have a job that pays an employee what there worth and make your town a hell hole like detroit
 
You meant Democrats, the Party of KKK, Jim Crow, Segregation, Tuskegee, Grand Kleagle Senate Majority Leader.
All from the South. Lincoln was a Repub, tell us of your profound respect for him and his actions to save the Union, including going to war against the South?
Hmmmm, no. Robert Byrd was from West Virginia, a union state. The KKK was quite popular in places like Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The only problem is the North freed the slaves and the South fought a war against this nation trying to stop such a thing. The history doesn't change just because you lie.

The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.
 
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!


can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

There was the First Version of the 13th Amendment they passed that would have enshrined slavery into the Constitution forever.
 
All from the South. Lincoln was a Repub, tell us of your profound respect for him and his actions to save the Union, including going to war against the South?
Hmmmm, no. Robert Byrd was from West Virginia, a union state. The KKK was quite popular in places like Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The only problem is the North freed the slaves and the South fought a war against this nation trying to stop such a thing. The history doesn't change just because you lie.

The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.

And how many modern day Democrats do you know who still support the right of secession?
 
Hmmmm, no. Robert Byrd was from West Virginia, a union state. The KKK was quite popular in places like Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The only problem is the North freed the slaves and the South fought a war against this nation trying to stop such a thing. The history doesn't change just because you lie.

The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.

And how many modern day Democrats do you know who still support the right of secession?

That's like asking how many communists support deregulation.
 
Still willing to throw themselves into the fray on behalf of the rich for empty promises of prosperity.
why you kind can never understand this is beyond me:
Money is not our number one priority
Freedom,jobs And low taxes are
 
Last edited:
Hmmmm, no. Robert Byrd was from West Virginia, a union state. The KKK was quite popular in places like Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The only problem is the North freed the slaves and the South fought a war against this nation trying to stop such a thing. The history doesn't change just because you lie.

The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.

And how many modern day Democrats do you know who still support the right of secession?
Why do you have such a short attention span? Some democrats wanted Cook county aka Chicago to leave illinois, the baldy brothers threaten to leave if bush jr got elected again
 
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!


can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.


in other words you have nothing but a bullshit dodge
 
The only problem is the North freed the slaves and the South fought a war against this nation trying to stop such a thing. The history doesn't change just because you lie.

The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.

And how many modern day Democrats do you know who still support the right of secession?

That's like asking how many communists support deregulation.

No, it's like asking a question you are incapable of giving a straight answer to.
 
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!


can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.

That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.
 
The only problem is the North freed the slaves and the South fought a war against this nation trying to stop such a thing. The history doesn't change just because you lie.

The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.

And how many modern day Democrats do you know who still support the right of secession?
Why do you have such a short attention span? Some democrats wanted Cook county aka Chicago to leave illinois, the baldy brothers threaten to leave if bush jr got elected again

So you think today's Democrats are much more the party that supports the idea of secession than are Republicans?

lol, you're fucked.
 
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!


can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.

That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.

First of all I wasn't aware that Supreme Court nominees going before Senate hearings was a crime.

Explain that to us.
 
The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.

And how many modern day Democrats do you know who still support the right of secession?
Why do you have such a short attention span? Some democrats wanted Cook county aka Chicago to leave illinois, the baldy brothers threaten to leave if bush jr got elected again

So you think today's Democrats are much more the party that supports the idea of secession than are Republicans?

lol, you're fucked.

Libertarians support secession. Conservatives generally don't.
 
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!


can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.

That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.

First of all I wasn't aware that Supreme Court nominees going before Senate hearings was a crime.

Explain that to us.

If they're conservatives, they are treated like criminals.
 
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!


can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.

That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.

First of all I wasn't aware that Supreme Court nominees going before Senate hearings was a crime.

Explain that to us.

Looking at or talking to a white woman wasn't a crime either, but that didn't save the lives of the black men killed for doing so. That's the whole point.
 
Have today's southern conservatives changed from since the days they were slaveholders?

You meant Democrats, the Party of KKK, Jim Crow, Segregation, Tuskegee, Grand Kleagle Senate Majority Leader.
All from the South. Lincoln was a Repub, tell us of your profound respect for him and his actions to save the Union, including going to war against the South?
Hmmmm, no. Robert Byrd was from West Virginia, a union state. The KKK was quite popular in places like Ohio and Pennsylvania.
The only problem is the North freed the slaves and the South fought a war against this nation trying to stop such a thing. The history doesn't change just because you lie.

The south merely defended itself from Northern aggression. Lincoln didn't invade Virginia to free the slaves. He did it to impose the Morrill tariff.

History doesn't change because you lie.

Right, the confederate traitors didn't attack Ft Sumpter, the FEDERAL post, lol

Ft Sumter was their territory, so they had every right to kick out those Yankee carpet bagger scum.

And how many modern day Democrats do you know who still support the right of secession?

Well Obama did call Republicans "the enemy"
 
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!


can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.

That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.

First of all I wasn't aware that Supreme Court nominees going before Senate hearings was a crime.

Explain that to us.

Looking at or talking to a white woman wasn't a crime either, but that didn't save the lives of the black men killed for doing so. That's the whole point.


how many were killed for that?

then compare that the number of white women raped or killed every year by black males
 
can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?

Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.

That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.

First of all I wasn't aware that Supreme Court nominees going before Senate hearings was a crime.

Explain that to us.

Looking at or talking to a white woman wasn't a crime either, but that didn't save the lives of the black men killed for doing so. That's the whole point.


how many were killed for that?

then compare that the number of white women raped or killed every year by black males

That's immaterial. The point is that the murderous racism of the past is contained by society today, and trying to claim one group or another is "just like" some group from the past is apples and oranges.
 
Overt racism is generally avoided nowadays.

Conservatives fought on the side of racism for decades, but they lost most of those battles to the progress of human civilization.

That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.

First of all I wasn't aware that Supreme Court nominees going before Senate hearings was a crime.

Explain that to us.

Looking at or talking to a white woman wasn't a crime either, but that didn't save the lives of the black men killed for doing so. That's the whole point.


how many were killed for that?

then compare that the number of white women raped or killed every year by black males

That's immaterial. The point is that the murderous racism of the past is contained by society today, and trying to claim one group or another is "just like" some group from the past is apples and oranges.


immaterial my ass

rampant black crime rules the day and is hardly "contained"

seems like its just fine in your mind that white women are raped and murdered

you are sick
 
That sounds like a pretty good answer to the OP. No, conservatives of today are not the same as the dead conservatives of 175 years ago. If "conservatives" killed uppity blacks back then and champion them today (Clarence Thomas reference for those of you who were incarcerated in government schools), they can't be the same. By the same token, if "liberals" (and gasp, they were almost entirely driven by Christianity), championed blacks 175 years ago and do high tech lynching of uppity blacks today, they also can't be the same.

First of all I wasn't aware that Supreme Court nominees going before Senate hearings was a crime.

Explain that to us.

Looking at or talking to a white woman wasn't a crime either, but that didn't save the lives of the black men killed for doing so. That's the whole point.


how many were killed for that?

then compare that the number of white women raped or killed every year by black males

That's immaterial. The point is that the murderous racism of the past is contained by society today, and trying to claim one group or another is "just like" some group from the past is apples and oranges.


immaterial my ass

rampant black crime rules the day and is hardly "contained"

seems like its just fine in your mind that white women are raped and murdered

you are sick

I care about people of all skin colors. Black women are raped and murdered just like white women are, and white men rape and murder just like black men do. Now, if you insist on focusing only on one combination, I question your ability to see the big picture and have to assume that you are only capable of outrage if the perpetrator of the crime is black.
 

Forum List

Back
Top