Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Rewriting history. Democrats started KKK. GOP freed the slaves.Bravo!There you go again. The democrats remained democrats. The republicans have never been for slavery. That is controlling people against their will, which is big government. Big government is Democrat policy. You democrats are still the same, only your methods have changed. Blacks are still on the Democrat plantation.They've only changed political parties.
lol
Are today's Southern Conservatives any different than Southern Conservatives from the Civil War?
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights
The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party.
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
It is true that most Republicans in 1964 held vastly more liberal positions on civil rights than Goldwater. This strikes [Kevin Williamson, the author of the National Review piece] as proof of the idiosyncratic and isolated quality of Goldwater's civil rights stance. What it actually shows is that conservatives had not yet gained control of the Republican Party.
But conservative Republicans — those represented politically by Goldwater, and intellectually by William F. Buckley and National Review — did oppose the civil rights movement. Buckley wrote frankly about his endorsement of white supremacy: "the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically." More often conservatives argued on grounds of states' rights, or freedom of property, or that civil rights leaders were annoying hypocrites, or that they had undermined respect for the law.
Conservatives Trying to Rewrite the History of Civil Rights Mother Jones
The Republican Party that championed civil rights in the mid-to-late 19th century all but abandoned the cause in the beginning of the 20th, as white America turned away from blacks, and left them to suffer at the hands of segregationists and lynch mobs. Key GOP politicians (like President Taft) embarked on a campaign to wash the Republican Party of its connection to blacks, in order to expand its constituency in the white South.
Conservatives Try to Rewrite Civil Rights History Again
They are the Party of Lincoln, that fucking hates Lincoln.Rewriting history. Democrats started KKK. GOP freed the slaves.Bravo!There you go again. The democrats remained democrats. The republicans have never been for slavery. That is controlling people against their will, which is big government. Big government is Democrat policy. You democrats are still the same, only your methods have changed. Blacks are still on the Democrat plantation.
lol
Are today's Southern Conservatives any different than Southern Conservatives from the Civil War?
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights
The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party.
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
It is true that most Republicans in 1964 held vastly more liberal positions on civil rights than Goldwater. This strikes [Kevin Williamson, the author of the National Review piece] as proof of the idiosyncratic and isolated quality of Goldwater's civil rights stance. What it actually shows is that conservatives had not yet gained control of the Republican Party.
But conservative Republicans — those represented politically by Goldwater, and intellectually by William F. Buckley and National Review — did oppose the civil rights movement. Buckley wrote frankly about his endorsement of white supremacy: "the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically." More often conservatives argued on grounds of states' rights, or freedom of property, or that civil rights leaders were annoying hypocrites, or that they had undermined respect for the law.
Conservatives Trying to Rewrite the History of Civil Rights Mother Jones
The Republican Party that championed civil rights in the mid-to-late 19th century all but abandoned the cause in the beginning of the 20th, as white America turned away from blacks, and left them to suffer at the hands of segregationists and lynch mobs. Key GOP politicians (like President Taft) embarked on a campaign to wash the Republican Party of its connection to blacks, in order to expand its constituency in the white South.
Conservatives Try to Rewrite Civil Rights History Again
Pity about the Southern strategy ruining the legacy of the Republican party. You can brag about being a member of the the party of Lincoln, big FEDERAL Gov't liberal who gave US the first income tax. Weird, unlike today's GOP he wanted to pay for war??? lol
Few things would make me happier than getting these un-American fuckers the hell out of my country.Conservative Author Defends Confederacy, Wants South to Secede and Name New Country ‘Reagan’
Former Reagan administration aide and conservative columnist Douglas MacKinnon recently came out with a new book titled The Secessionist States of America: The Blueprint for Creation a Traditional Values Country…Now.
...Take this recent poll that showed less than half of the people living in Mississippi would support the United States against the Confederacy if a second Civil War was fought. Then there’s the League of the South which has put up billboards promoting secession.
Conservative Author Defends Confederacy Wants South to Secede and Name New Country Reagan
Look at what he wrote fool:Your "leader", what are you babbling on about? I am not American and I know who this GOP mega donor is. God you are so fucking stupid.Hilarious. The first time I heard the name Sheldon Abelson, I had to go look up who he was. I had no idea he was one of my "leaders".A member of the "liberal elite" that controls the GOP is jewish casino mogul and zionist Sheldon Adelson. He supports mass immigration and increased support for Israel, among other things . Another "liberal elite" who has been known to fund pro-immigration/pro-amnesty republicans is Mark Zuckerberg. Just two off the top of my head. I can list more.I'm curious. Since the Democratic Party is made up of the whites Republicans don't want, like gays, atheists, college professors, scientists, liberals and so on and the rest of the party are black, Hispanic, Asian and so on, who exactly are the "Liberal Elite"? Since we know there are also conservatives in the Democratic Party, called Blue Dogs, would they follow the "Liberal Elite"? Their voting pattern proves they tend to vote conservative. In fact, liberals seem to be a narrow part of the party.I would say the liberal elite that control both parties in America are most similar to the slaveholders of the 19th century. They support unrestricted third world immigration for cheap labor(for the republican donors) and votes(for the democrats). Both undermine the white working class(blacks even more so) with this current immigration policy.
Unlike Republicans. 90% white. Remember, Republicans recently voted the single Jew they had in congress and replaced him with "David Dukes without the baggage" making them 100% Christian. So who are these "Liberal Elite" and what holds them together as a "group"?
Yes, The regular white people support the GOP, but the GOP never represents their interests, supporting immigration policies that undermine their base, and always trying to "diversify" as though, white interests are illegitmate.
White Americans have no political representation and dire need of it or they will become a minority in their own country.
I know what I wrote you idiot. Shel Adelson is a liberal and a GOP mega donor, his primary domestic policy point is to open immigration further by increasing legal immigration and allowing amnesty. I don't understand what is so hard to understand.Look at what he wrote fool:Your "leader", what are you babbling on about? I am not American and I know who this GOP mega donor is. God you are so fucking stupid.Hilarious. The first time I heard the name Sheldon Abelson, I had to go look up who he was. I had no idea he was one of my "leaders".A member of the "liberal elite" that controls the GOP is jewish casino mogul and zionist Sheldon Adelson. He supports mass immigration and increased support for Israel, among other things . Another "liberal elite" who has been known to fund pro-immigration/pro-amnesty republicans is Mark Zuckerberg. Just two off the top of my head. I can list more.I'm curious. Since the Democratic Party is made up of the whites Republicans don't want, like gays, atheists, college professors, scientists, liberals and so on and the rest of the party are black, Hispanic, Asian and so on, who exactly are the "Liberal Elite"? Since we know there are also conservatives in the Democratic Party, called Blue Dogs, would they follow the "Liberal Elite"? Their voting pattern proves they tend to vote conservative. In fact, liberals seem to be a narrow part of the party.I would say the liberal elite that control both parties in America are most similar to the slaveholders of the 19th century. They support unrestricted third world immigration for cheap labor(for the republican donors) and votes(for the democrats). Both undermine the white working class(blacks even more so) with this current immigration policy.
Unlike Republicans. 90% white. Remember, Republicans recently voted the single Jew they had in congress and replaced him with "David Dukes without the baggage" making them 100% Christian. So who are these "Liberal Elite" and what holds them together as a "group"?
Yes, The regular white people support the GOP, but the GOP never represents their interests, supporting immigration policies that undermine their base, and always trying to "diversify" as though, white interests are illegitmate.
White Americans have no political representation and dire need of it or they will become a minority in their own country.
A member of the "liberal elite" that controls the GOP is jewish casino mogul and zionist Sheldon Adelson.
See? Liberal Elite that controls the GOP. God you're a tard.
Since Lincoln was GOP, the GOP went to war to free the slaves. The only problem is, no one in the South voted to free them and that is now the GOP, the same old racists in the same old racist South...Rewriting history. Democrats started KKK. GOP freed the slaves.Bravo!There you go again. The democrats remained democrats. The republicans have never been for slavery. That is controlling people against their will, which is big government. Big government is Democrat policy. You democrats are still the same, only your methods have changed. Blacks are still on the Democrat plantation.They've only changed political parties.
lol
Are today's Southern Conservatives any different than Southern Conservatives from the Civil War?
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights
The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party.
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
It is true that most Republicans in 1964 held vastly more liberal positions on civil rights than Goldwater. This strikes [Kevin Williamson, the author of the National Review piece] as proof of the idiosyncratic and isolated quality of Goldwater's civil rights stance. What it actually shows is that conservatives had not yet gained control of the Republican Party.
But conservative Republicans — those represented politically by Goldwater, and intellectually by William F. Buckley and National Review — did oppose the civil rights movement. Buckley wrote frankly about his endorsement of white supremacy: "the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically." More often conservatives argued on grounds of states' rights, or freedom of property, or that civil rights leaders were annoying hypocrites, or that they had undermined respect for the law.
Conservatives Trying to Rewrite the History of Civil Rights Mother Jones
The Republican Party that championed civil rights in the mid-to-late 19th century all but abandoned the cause in the beginning of the 20th, as white America turned away from blacks, and left them to suffer at the hands of segregationists and lynch mobs. Key GOP politicians (like President Taft) embarked on a campaign to wash the Republican Party of its connection to blacks, in order to expand its constituency in the white South.
Conservatives Try to Rewrite Civil Rights History Again
"the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically."
"the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically."
Seems good and right to me, what do you support, rule by the mob, by a 51% majority?
Few things would make me happier than getting these un-American fuckers the hell out of my country.Conservative Author Defends Confederacy, Wants South to Secede and Name New Country ‘Reagan’
Former Reagan administration aide and conservative columnist Douglas MacKinnon recently came out with a new book titled The Secessionist States of America: The Blueprint for Creation a Traditional Values Country…Now.
...Take this recent poll that showed less than half of the people living in Mississippi would support the United States against the Confederacy if a second Civil War was fought. Then there’s the League of the South which has put up billboards promoting secession.
Conservative Author Defends Confederacy Wants South to Secede and Name New Country Reagan
Conservative Author Defends Confederacy, Wants South to Secede and Name New Country ‘Reagan’
Former Reagan administration aide and conservative columnist Douglas MacKinnon recently came out with a new book titled The Secessionist States of America: The Blueprint for Creation a Traditional Values Country…Now.
...Take this recent poll that showed less than half of the people living in Mississippi would support the United States against the Confederacy if a second Civil War was fought. Then there’s the League of the South which has put up billboards promoting secession.
Conservative Author Defends Confederacy Wants South to Secede and Name New Country Reagan
This is why liberals should not be involved with education. They've trained you people to ignore facts. Shall I repeat it again? The GOP was and is against slavery, the Democrats weren't. GOP is also against the government telling you what to do. Democrats want the government telling you what you can and can't do. Slavery is telling a man what he can do. That has always been democrat philosophy. It's not a liberal or concervative issue as you gleefully want to claim. It's laughable that you think slavery loving democrats are now republican. If southerners hated the democrats, why did they vote for Jimmy Carter? Is it because Jimmy is a racist?Since Lincoln was GOP, the GOP went to war to free the slaves. The only problem is, no one in the South voted to free them and that is now the GOP, the same old racists in the same old racist South...
I can declare my white ass is a member of the New Black Panther Party, it doesn't mean the NBP acknowledges my membership or would remotely consider me a leader of that organization.And he switched to republican like all the other Right Wing Democrats did. He's still a White Supremacist.David Duke was a democrat when he was in the KKK.
It's a shame you have direct influence over three, dad2three.Rewriting history. Democrats started KKK. GOP freed the slaves.Bravo!There you go again. The democrats remained democrats. The republicans have never been for slavery. That is controlling people against their will, which is big government. Big government is Democrat policy. You democrats are still the same, only your methods have changed. Blacks are still on the Democrat plantation.They've only changed political parties.
lol
Are today's Southern Conservatives any different than Southern Conservatives from the Civil War?
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights
The mainstream, and correct, history of the politics of civil rights is as follows. Southern white supremacy operated out of the Democratic Party beginning in the nineteenth century, but the party began attracting northern liberals, including African-Americans, into an ideologically cumbersome coalition. Over time the liberals prevailed, forcing the Democratic Party to support civil rights, and driving conservative (and especially southern) whites out, where they realigned with the Republican Party.
The Conservative Fantasy History of Civil Rights -- NYMag
It is true that most Republicans in 1964 held vastly more liberal positions on civil rights than Goldwater. This strikes [Kevin Williamson, the author of the National Review piece] as proof of the idiosyncratic and isolated quality of Goldwater's civil rights stance. What it actually shows is that conservatives had not yet gained control of the Republican Party.
But conservative Republicans — those represented politically by Goldwater, and intellectually by William F. Buckley and National Review — did oppose the civil rights movement. Buckley wrote frankly about his endorsement of white supremacy: "the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically." More often conservatives argued on grounds of states' rights, or freedom of property, or that civil rights leaders were annoying hypocrites, or that they had undermined respect for the law.
Conservatives Trying to Rewrite the History of Civil Rights Mother Jones
The Republican Party that championed civil rights in the mid-to-late 19th century all but abandoned the cause in the beginning of the 20th, as white America turned away from blacks, and left them to suffer at the hands of segregationists and lynch mobs. Key GOP politicians (like President Taft) embarked on a campaign to wash the Republican Party of its connection to blacks, in order to expand its constituency in the white South.
Conservatives Try to Rewrite Civil Rights History Again
You mean conservatives, mainly the South, today's GOP base? Yes, lol
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!
Did I say Ted Nugent or Rush Limbaugh were sponsoring legislation? Was birther in chief Donald Trump a Democrat?It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!
can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?
There you go again. The democrats remained democrats. The republicans have never been for slavery. That is controlling people against their will, which is big government. Big government is Democrat policy. You democrats are still the same, only your methods have changed. Blacks are still on the Democrat plantation.They've only changed political parties.
It`s a nice gesture on the part of these posters to inform us that the Dems were the party of the klan and Republicans freed the slaves. That was 15 decades ago!
can you show us the GOP sponsored racist laws?
