Are Wasserman-Schultz and the other Dems guilty of violating their oath of office?

[toobfreak]

Makes sense, as only about .5% understand or even respect their oath in the first place.

Most of them seemingly don't even really grasp the four organic founding documents of our country.

 

[The Duke]

DWS and the Democrats who voted to censor RFJ Jr took oaths of office to uphold the Constitution. Despite this, they - in their government capacities - attempted to violate his First Amendment right to free speech.

Dems love censorship so much they do it . . . at a censorship hearing

On Thursday, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.) sought to use a technical House rule to try to stop RFK, Jr.’s testimony on the grounds that he had made earlier “despicable” statement…

nypost.com

Yes.

 

[The Duke]

Most of them seemingly don't even really grasp the four organic founding documents of our country.

Those that do look for ways to circumvent them.

I'd say at least 80% of Democrats violate their oath of office egregiously during their career.

More than half that of Republicans do, too.

 

[toobfreak]

Those that do look for ways to circumvent them.
I'd say at least 80% of Democrats violate their oath of office egregiously during their career.
More than half that of Republicans do, too.

So, my guess that 85% of what our federal government does is illegal, might not be too far off.

 

[Pete7469]

Ya think?

The DNC is not a "political party". It's a treasonous criminal syndicate and it has been one since at least 1860. It may support political whores, but it's just a branch of criminal enterprise that retains power so that it is never held accountable or eradicated like it ought to be. There is nothing noble, virtuous, or even clean about that entity. Every elected official and insider is a criminal and traitor. They should be expelled from the country in all cases at the very least, with all of their assets sold or traded to benefit homeless vets and reduce the debt.

 

[22lcidw]

no

Many may have started differently than they are now. She and Progs answer to the godless Progressive Socialist Communist elite agendas. They get their marching orders every day. Then it is easy to be arrogant and self-serving from them. The discourse in the Congress is worse than any time in history. We know it because RFK Jr. a left leaning Democrat is accused of being a racist and bigot from his own. For the crime of not being as far left as they are now. In the end, trusting true weasels will get many killed.

 

[Marener]

Most of them seemingly don't even really grasp the four organic founding documents of our country.

That’s funny, because you were the one that wanted to jail the press for not saying what you wanted them to say.

 

[Flash]

DWS and the Democrats who voted to censor RFJ Jr took oaths of office to uphold the Constitution. Despite this, they - in their government capacities - attempted to violate his First Amendment right to free speech.

Dems love censorship so much they do it . . . at a censorship hearing

On Thursday, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.) sought to use a technical House rule to try to stop RFK, Jr.’s testimony on the grounds that he had made earlier “despicable” statement…

nypost.com

We all know that Democrats don't know any more about the Constitution than they know about Economics, History, Climate Science, Biology or Ethics.

Of course they may know about the First Amendment but typical of Leftest simply don't give a crap about freedom of speech just like they don't don't give a crap about freedom of religion or the right to keep and bear arms.

.

 

[Flash]

You fucking idiot. RFK was not censored.

republicans wanted to give him 10 minutes for his opening statement INSTEAD OF THE USUAL FIVE MINUTES

He got the ten..

He was not censored nor was there an attempt to censor him.

Which was the Democrat's filth way of censuring him. What was wrong with hearing him talk? Why were they trying to shut him up? What were they afraid of?

 

[Papageorgio]

I know this will disappoint the Nazis, but the government is not obligated to give antisemite filth like Kennedy a speaking platform.

Find somewhere else to spread your fascist propaganda.

So he was asked to come to Congress to testify and he went to speak and they shut him down, why did they invite him? So they would all look like tyrants? Good plan! I wouldn’t of invited him, that’s me.

 

[Lesh]

Which was the Democrat's filth way of censuring him. What was wrong with hearing him talk? Why were they trying to shut him up? What were they afraid of?

How is getting more than the normal amount of time for opening statements “censorship “?

 

[Marener]

Which was the Democrat's filth way of censuring him. What was wrong with hearing him talk? Why were they trying to shut him up? What were they afraid of?

Misinformation about vaccines has killed tens or hundreds of thousands of people just in the last few years.

Not to mention the antisemitic conspiracy theories.

 

[mamooth]

So he was asked to come to Congress to testify and he went to speak and they shut him down, why did they invite him?

Because Republicans lovelovelove antisemites.

Why did you imply Democrats invited him? Was that deliberate dishonesty on your part, or just stupidity?

Good luck with your "boohoo, the evil Democrats don't like antisemites!" tactics. That's really going to play well with voters.

 

[Papageorgio]

Because Republicans lovelovelove antisemites.

Why did you imply Democrats invited him? Was that deliberate dishonesty on your part, or just stupidity?

Good luck with your "boohoo, the evil Democrats don't like antisemites!" tactics. That's really going to play well with voters.

Cortez, Talib and other Democrats love them antisemites.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

We all know that Democrats don't know any more about the Constitution than they know about Economics, History, Climate Science, Biology or Ethics.

Of course they may know about the First Amendment but typical of Leftest simply don't give a crap about freedom of speech just like they don't don't give a crap about freedom of religion or the right to keep and bear arms.

.

Nailed it!

 

[mamooth]

Haven't the Trump cultists here been issued a new weepy butthurt talking point yet? This one is way past its sell-by date.

Trump cultists, run and check. You wouldn't want to be the last person to repeat the new dumb talking point.

 

[Lastamender]

but however they are obligated to give these anti semites a platform eh ?
View attachment 806752

Oh snap!!

 

[BluesLegend]

So why do the Republicans and the MSM keep shilling so hard for Kennedy

The enemy of our enemy is our friend. Corrupt worthless POS Dems must be stopped.

 

[The Duke]

Haven't the Trump cultists here been issued a new weepy butthurt talking point yet? This one is way past its sell-by date.

Trump cultists, run and check. You wouldn't want to be the last person to repeat the new dumb talking point.

Only retards like you use talking points, my moron friend.

 

[Independent thinker]

DWS and the Democrats who voted to censor RFJ Jr took oaths of office to uphold the Constitution. Despite this, they - in their government capacities - attempted to violate his First Amendment right to free speech.

Dems love censorship so much they do it . . . at a censorship hearing

On Thursday, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.) sought to use a technical House rule to try to stop RFK, Jr.’s testimony on the grounds that he had made earlier “despicable” statement…

nypost.com

Absolutely. I'll be waiting for charges to be brought up on them.