Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are you the bitch whisperer?Shut up with your fake translations
I have something you don't.
Yeah its called a vagina
Well, the more obvious thing I have you don't here is a brain. I do like your insistence in proving my point that you don't allow some bimbo to disagree with you proves your sexism while claiming to not grasp my argument. But then as we've already established, I do have that brain you don't have...
No what you have is a vag and accusations. Thats why I asked you to prove your point and you cant. You just come back with more accusations.
Kaz: Why do you beat your wife? Answer the question
GTFOH
I am pointing out your endless sexism in that you only allow women to agree with you. You do not accept their ability to disagree, you attack them. If you believe women are equal, they have the right to disagree with you. You don't afford them that. No bimbo will defy you, women are not allowed to think differently than you.
Note there's no question mark in that, moron. I didn't ask you as question. I am pointing out your sexism which you keep insisting on proving.
No what you have is a vag and accusations. Thats why I asked you to prove your point and you cant. You just come back with more accusations.
Kaz: Why do you beat your wife? Answer the question
GTFOH
I am pointing out your endless sexism in that you only allow women to agree with you. You do not accept their ability to disagree, you attack them. If you believe women are equal, they have the right to disagree with you. You don't afford them that. No bimbo will defy you, women are not allowed to think differently than you.
Note there's no question mark in that, moron. I didn't ask you as question. I am pointing out your sexism which you keep insisting on proving.
No what I dont accept is bitchassness and you are displaying it right now and you keep mentioning your lack of proof of anything stop being a fag..
*peace out*
Leftist douchebags are the ones who equate the higher degree of personal conversation among women as a sign of their stupidity.
Women tend to get together and talk about their kids. Progressives think that means they're stupid.
So WHO is it that hates women again?
Leftist douchebags are the ones who equate the higher degree of personal conversation among women as a sign of their stupidity.
Women tend to get together and talk about their kids. Progressives think that means they're stupid.
So WHO is it that hates women again?
Well ... in case you missed it - this was a Republican.
Leftist douchebags are the ones who equate the higher degree of personal conversation among women as a sign of their stupidity.
Women tend to get together and talk about their kids. Progressives think that means they're stupid.
So WHO is it that hates women again?
Well ... in case you missed it - this was a Republican.
Leftist douchebags are the ones who equate the higher degree of personal conversation among women as a sign of their stupidity.
Women tend to get together and talk about their kids. Progressives think that means they're stupid.
So WHO is it that hates women again?
Well ... in case you missed it - this was a Republican.
Leftist douchebags are the ones who equate the higher degree of personal conversation among women as a sign of their stupidity.
Women tend to get together and talk about their kids. Progressives think that means they're stupid.
So WHO is it that hates women again?
Well ... in case you missed it - this was a Republican.
unkoshergoon only sees what suits her dishonest purpose...
the GOP desperately wants to convince women that the evil liberals completely made up this 'war on women' euphemism...
now if only all the smart number crunching men could just dumb down the real life consequences of budget cuts and such, then and only then could women possibly comprehend these complicated things thus realizing it is really the evil liberals who think women are dumb for buying into that silly 'war on women' thing.
"Men do tend to talk about things on a much higher level. Many of my male colleagues, when they go to the House floor they've got some pie chart or graph behind them and they're talking about trillions of dollars and how the debt is awful and we all agree with that...We need our male colleagues to understand that if you can bring it down to a woman's level and what everything that she is balancing in her life -- that's the way to go."
Rep. Renee Ellmers, on the GOP appealing to women voters
maybe they should call it the 'translating pie charts to pies' campaign!
Leftist douchebags are the ones who equate the higher degree of personal conversation among women as a sign of their stupidity.
Women tend to get together and talk about their kids. Progressives think that means they're stupid.
So WHO is it that hates women again?
Well ... in case you missed it - this was a Republican.
unkoshergoon only sees what suits her dishonest purpose...
the GOP desperately wants to convince women that the evil liberals completely made up this 'war on women' euphemism...
now if only all the smart number crunching men could just dumb down the real life consequences of budget cuts and such, then and only then could women possibly comprehend these complicated things thus realizing it is really the evil liberals who think women are dumb for buying into that silly 'war on women' thing.
"Men do tend to talk about things on a much higher level. Many of my male colleagues, when they go to the House floor they've got some pie chart or graph behind them and they're talking about trillions of dollars and how the debt is awful and we all agree with that...We need our male colleagues to understand that if you can bring it down to a woman's level and what everything that she is balancing in her life -- that's the way to go."
Rep. Renee Ellmers, on the GOP appealing to women voters
maybe they should call it the 'translating pie charts to pies' campaign!
High- and low-level - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
High-level and low-level are terms used in classifying levels of description and goals in many fields where systems could be described from different perspectives.
A high-level description is one that is more abstracted, describes overall goals and systemic features, and is typically more concerned with the system as a whole, or larger components of it.
A low-level description is one that describes individual components, provides detail rather than overview, rudimentary functions rather than complex overall ones, and is typically more concerned with individual components within the system and how they operate.
Low and high level are relative; for example the graphics engine that drives a computer game and works at the level of entities in the game, is high level compared to the video subsystem DirectX that works on the level of renderable objects, which itself is high level compared to a vertex shader within that system.
High and low level descriptions are not a reference to intelligence. In many cases talking about and understanding low-level components of a system can take much greater intelligence than the high-level overview. Talking about the high-level point of view is like standing on a mountain peak; You get a great view of the whole, but you can't appreciate from that perspective the individual components that make it up. Speaking on a lower level on the other hand is about the specifics that drive the system. And it takes intelligence to understand EITHER of these perspectives of a truly complex system.
Carly Fiorina, for example, IS smart enough...
so she has no excuse for insulting the intelligence of women...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/363604-carly-fiona-destroys-the-war-on-women.html#post9395772
I'm sorry that you don't understand the difference between discussing things at a high and low level.
Republican women seem to think so. The following quote is from a female republican House member. It was made at a lecture to republican legislators on how to get the women's vote.
"Men do tend to talk about things on a much higher level. Many of my male colleagues, when they go to the House floor they've got some pie chart or graph behind them and they're talking about trillions of dollars and how the debt is awful and we all agree with that...We need our male colleagues to understand that if you can bring it down to a woman's level and what everything that she is balancing in her life -- that's the way to go."
Rep. Renee Ellmers, on the GOP appealing to women voters
Leftist douchebags are the ones who equate the higher degree of personal conversation among women as a sign of their stupidity.
Women tend to get together and talk about their kids. Progressives think that means they're stupid.
So WHO is it that hates women again?
Well ... in case you missed it - this was a Republican.
smart people realize that pie charts in politics are typically simplistic low-level props.
