Armed Federal Agents Could Be Sent To Examine Ballot-Counting Locations, Justice Department Tells Prosecutors

[colfax_m]

You talk to them?

I read their lawsuits.

 

[Toro]

It's funny. Even if the FBI went in and then found no evidence of fraud, all these people screaming fraud would accuse the FBI of being part of the fraud! lol

 

[miketx]

You talk to them?

I read their lawsuits.

Fake news

 

[LeftofLeft]

Haven't you figured out how to tell the difference between reality and Trump's bluster?

Haven't you figured out that voter fraud is obviously going on when a judge in Philadelphia orders the Democrats to let the Republican poll watchers in, and the Democrats respond by putting a lock and chain on the door to keep them out????

Why would the doors be locked upon a judge’ orders? Philadelphia is the same town that had Black Panthers with night sticks out at polling place during Obama election as well as a judge pleading guilty to stuffing ballots.

 

[colfax_m]

Why would the doors be locked upon a judge’ orders?

They weren’t. It’s just lie after lie after lie.

 

[CowboyTed]

Haven't you figured out how to tell the difference between reality and Trump's bluster?

Haven't you figured out that voter fraud is obviously going on when a judge in Philadelphia orders the Democrats to let the Republican poll watchers in, and the Democrats respond by putting a lock and chain on the door to keep them out????

Link...

I know the truth but I want you to find something that back that narrative

 

[miketx]

Haven't you figured out how to tell the difference between reality and Trump's bluster?

Haven't you figured out that voter fraud is obviously going on when a judge in Philadelphia orders the Democrats to let the Republican poll watchers in, and the Democrats respond by putting a lock and chain on the door to keep them out????

Link...

I know the truth but I want you to find something that back that narrative

 

[Dragonlady]

Anyone who is truly and genuinely concerned with the health of our democracy would take any claims of voter fraud or impropriety seriously, not dismiss them out of hand.

None of you liberals care. It was never about preserving the health and integrity of our voting system. Anyone who agrees with this behavior is nothing more than a thief to me.

Anyone who is truly and genuinely concerned about the health of our democracy wouldn't be launching a full frontal assault on our institutions for months, as President Trump has been.

Yeah, no. Democrats have been doing that for the past four years.

Don't you dare lecture me.

No. Trump has been opposed since before he was inaugurated because he is an unqualified pig.

Interesting.

In what way was he unqualified? Because you don't like him?

Spare me.

Let me count the ways Donald Trump was unqualified:

1. No experience working in government - at all. No idea of how government works or is supposed to work. Spent his entire career being opposed to everything government did, which was keeping HIM from fully exploiting the power his wealth gave him in forcing him to respect the rights of others. Including, but not limited to bribery, corruption, and extortion of government officials to bend them to his will.

2. Big money construction is the most corrupt business on the face of the planet, and I say this as someone who spent the last 15 years of my working career working for guys who could buy or sell Donald Trump on a daily basis. No one from that field should be allowed anywhere near the levers of power. It is impossible to be fully honest and above board in that business, and honesty is a necessity in a politician.

3. Donald Trump has never worked for a publically owned corporation, and has never had to deal with a board of directors or oversight of any kind. He grew up in a closely held private corporation where his word was law. Anyone who said "No" to him was fired.

4. 6 bankruptcies when he announced his campaign, and 7 bankruptcies by the time he was elected. American banks stopped lending to Trump in the late 1990's. No tax returns released before the election. Only recently have we found out what he's hiding.

5. Policies which have been disastrous for the country, both at home and abroad.

 

[Dragonlady]

Haven't you figured out how to tell the difference between reality and Trump's bluster?

Haven't you figured out that voter fraud is obviously going on when a judge in Philadelphia orders the Democrats to let the Republican poll watchers in, and the Democrats respond by putting a lock and chain on the door to keep them out????

Haven't you figured out that NOTHING OF THE KIND IS HAPPENING?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Sure. Just let the feds trample all over the state's ability to conduct an election.
So much for that Constitution..eh?

Sure. Just let the states, like Pennsylvania, cheat their asses off unchcecked and unopposed.
How many stupid posts can you make in one day?

Invoking the US Constitution is just the cherry on your big bowl of idiocy.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

It's funny. Even if the FBI went in and then found no evidence of fraud, all these people screaming fraud would accuse the FBI of being part of the fraud! lol

But we already know in general terms the democrats have conducted a fraud filled election.
More ballots cast then registered voters, locking out election observers, thousands of ballots being
surreptitiously brought into the PO in early morning hours, etc.

Your attempt to preemptively insure the bad news is discounted is noted, however.

 

[iceberg]

Prove it.

Because the other side of the idiotic Trump supporter threads have Republican observers claiming they saw miscounting.

Trump's lawyers aren't even claiming this.

why would a lawyer be claiming anything right now until they gather evidence?

you are pointless to talk to.

 

[BlackSand]

Looks like the DOJ might be getting ready to investigate some possible instances of federal voter fraud...

Armed Federal Agents Could Be Sent To Examine Ballot-Counting Locations, Justice Department Tells Prosecutors

The Department of Justice sent a memo to prosecutors Wednesday saying it could send armed agents to ballot-counting locations to investigate potential voter fraud, The New York Times reported. While federal law prohibits armed troops or law enforcement from stationing at any place an election is...

www.conservativedailynews.com

The Department of Justice sent a memo to prosecutors Wednesday saying it could send armed agents to ballot-counting locations to investigate potential voter fraud, The New York Times reported.

While federal law prohibits armed troops or law enforcement from stationing at any place an election is held unless force is determined “necessary,” the Department of Justice (DOJ) believes the law allows agents to station at places that are counting votes following the election, three unnamed officials familiar told The New York Times.

“[The statute] does not prevent armed federal law enforcement persons from responding to, investigate, or prevent federal crimes at closed polling places or at other locations where votes are being counted,” senior DOJ official Richard P. Donoghue told prosecutors in an email Wednesday, according to The Times.

Donoghue’s message to prosecutors comes as the 2020 election remains undecided, according to Decision Desk HQ. Key battleground states Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona have been contested since Tuesday.

Poll observers are used to establish a basis of trust in our elections that the Public can rely on.
It doesn't matter what anyone does now, because the observers now, cannot establish the trust they are there to provide.

Having to send armed agents to escort the observers would only be a necessity if you didn't trust the process.
The only reason a poll worker would object to being watched, would be if they intend on doing something wrong.
In either case, the trust is gone, and the electorate would rather fight about what they may want to believe.

Regardless who believes what about about voter fraud ... It's a bit too late for that ...

.

 

[colfax_m]

why would a lawyer be claiming anything right now until they gather evidence?

If there is no evidence, why is Trump claiming there is fraud?

Here’s how he works:
1. Realize you’re losing
2. Declare you’re losing because of fraud
3. Look for evidence to fit you’re conclusion

That’s about as dishonest as it gets.