Arrest Made In Attempt To Obstruct Election Certification

[Independent thinker]

But HILLARY!!!!

These people didn't conspire with other to plant fake electors and overthrow the election. These people simply said that Trump was unfit for office and the electors shouldn't certify him. And they were RIGHT!!!!!

The charge is obstructing the electoral vote certification, the very same thing democrats did in 2017.

 

[Independent thinker]

This isn't a court, it's an hearing. Nobody has been charged with ANYTHING - yet. Nobody has been "rounded up".

Last but not least, you cannot be believe the election was "stolen", and investigate what happened, because the election wasn't stolen. The pro-Trumpers gleefully announced how they were going to "disrupt" the hearings and politicize the whole thing.

The country doesn't need another display of Jim Jordan's attack dog theatrics to obscure the criminality of the Trump Administration. Jordan participated in the planning dinners at the White House and has a vested interest in prevent the public from finding out what happened - he potentially has criminal liability.

You don't put the arsonist on the committee investigating the cause of the fire, and the "pro-Trumpers" Kevin McCarthy tried to appoint were involved with the planning and execution of January 6th.

What? The committee has indeed rounded up protesters, charged them with crimes, and jailed them.

 

[Marener]

The committee is a kangaroo committee, comprised of nothing but ant-Trumpers.

So what? That doesn’t stop Trump from running or people from voting for him.

 

[Independent thinker]

So what? That doesn’t stop Trump from running or people from voting for him.

It is a clear abuse of power trying to lock Trump up using a kangaroo court.

 

[Marener]

It is a clear abuse of power trying to lock Trump up using a kangaroo court.

Is it an abuse of power to try to lock Trump up for violating the laws of the country?

 

[Independent thinker]

Is it an abuse of power to try to lock Trump up for violating the laws of the country?

You don't go after political enemies with a kangaroo court and then have the DOJ doing your bidding for you, marching to your kangaroo committee's orders. There will be paybacks.

 

[Marener]

You don't go after political enemies with a kangaroo court and then have the DOJ doing your bidding for you, marching to your kangaroo committee's orders. There will be paybacks.

I think that people who might run for office are still bound by the laws. Why would anyone want the DoJ to treat them differently?

 

[Independent thinker]

I think that people who might run for office are still bound by the laws. Why would anyone want the DoJ to treat them differently?

Well, don't people want the DOJ to be independent, fair, and unbiased? That doesn't seem to be happening. First, democrats attack Garland for not doing enough to get Trump and then shortly afterward Garland raids Trump's home due to the marching orders from democrats and the Jan 6th kangaroo committee made up of nothing but anti-Trumpers. Then the DOJ releases a photograph supposedly incriminating Trump (which it doesn't actually do). Hardly independent, fair, and unbiased.

 

[Marener]

Well, don't people want the DOJ to be independent, fair, and unbiased? That doesn't seem to be happening. First, democrats attack Garland for not doing enough to get Trump and then shortly afterward Garland raids Trump's home due to the marching orders from democrats and the Jan 6th kangaroo committee made up of nothing but anti-Trumpers. Then the DOJ releases a photograph supposedly incriminating Trump (which it doesn't actually do). Hardly independent, fair, and unbiased.

You’re extremely biased so you’re going to call anything that Garland does unfair.

Garland approved a warrant to get classified documents from Mar a Lago.

What did he find? Classified documents.

 

[Independent thinker]

You’re extremely biased so you’re going to call anything that Garland does unfair.

Garland approved a warrant to get classified documents from Mar a Lago.

What did he find? Classified documents.

The left attacked Garland for not doing enough to get Trump and gave Garland his marching orders. Shortly after Garland raids Trump's home. But, it's all just a coincidence.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

But --------------------- they were trying to stop the process. And, they had no legal right or power to do so, which is why Biden continually gaveled them.

Correct, the people who stormed the Capital building on Jan 6th had no legal right or power to do so. The elected officials inside the building did.

 

[Marener]

The left attacked Garland for not doing enough to get Trump and gave Garland his marching orders. Shortly after Garland raids Trump's home. But, it's all just a coincidence.

The left has been attacking Garland for a year. That’s not even a coincidence.

 

[Faun]

"Kellye SoRelle — general counsel for the antigovernment group — was arrested in Texas on charges including conspiracy to obstruct the certification of President Joe Biden's electoral college victory, the Justice Department said."

Oath Keepers' lawyer arrested in connection with Jan. 6

A lawyer for the far-right Oath Keepers extremist group has been charged with conspiracy in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack at the U.S. Capitol, authorities said Thursday. Kellye SoRelle — general counsel for the antigovernment group — was arrested in Texas on charges including...

www.yahoo.com

Here's what happened after the 2016 election:

Front Page Featured | MRCTV

www.cnsnews.com

I'll be waiting for the arrest of:

James McGovern (D-Mass.)

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.)

Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tx)

Arizona Rep. Raúl Grijalva

And several others. What time frame should we expect their arrests by the independent, fair, and unbiased DOJ?

So you don't even know it's perfectly legal for members of Congress to voice objections during the joint session to certify a presidential election??

Imagine my surprise.

 

[Independent thinker]

Correct, the people who stormed the Capital building on Jan 6th had no legal right or power to do so. The elected officials inside the building did.

And, just like in 2017, the electoral vote was certified.

 

[Independent thinker]

The left has been attacking Garland for a year. That’s not even a coincidence.

They upped their attacks just before the raid.

 

[Independent thinker]

So you don't even know it's perfectly legal for members of Congress to voice objections during the joint session to certify a presidential election??

Imagine my surprise.

But they were trying to obstruct the electoral vote certification, the very same charges this lady faces.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And, just like in 2017, the electoral vote was certified.

Yes, the only difference being that in 2017 there was not an attack on the capital building by the worshipers of the person that lost.

Some of us find that difference to be significant

 

[bodecea]

My God man!

Over 100 people were arrested at Trumps INAUGURATION and hillary NEVER conceded...She went immediately into her RUSSIA COLLUSION bull shit.

Well, that's a lie.

 

[AMart]

Not a single objection was considered in 2016, there were no rioters at the door, and Sec. Clinton had conceded early in the morning after the election.

Elected Democrats tried to coerce electoral voters to cast their vote for Hillary despite Trump winning their state.

 

[Marener]

They upped their attacks just before the raid.

You were going to wail and moan no matter when this happened. It’s not Garland’s job to let Trump off the hook to please you.