Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually I'm ok with it. I think we should have 2 abortions in this case. The baby and the father.0If this is, in fact,m true, the perpetrator should be executed.
Pro-life zealots should admit that this is one of those cases where their insistence on "no exemptions" is a disgusting stance to take.
They won't, though. They're too chickenshit...
. Children are in no position to raise other children. Why would you force that on her? Why would you force her parents to?
Especially those of either kind who think that ten year-olds can have an "affair" with a grown man.All democrats should be deported along with illegals.
If you had bothered to read the entire question, I am covering all the scenarios that may occur if that 10-year-old was forced to have the child. If not her, the parents.
Yes. Just not enough to turn the evil tide. There is a reason why sex crimes against children carry, or should carry, draconian penalties. The child has no way out that does not carry heavy penalties. Far worse than any adult would have to pay.EvilCat Breath
That reminds me of a bible verse...
New Living Translation
If you set a trap for others, you will get caught in it yourself. If you roll a boulder down on others, it will crush you instead.
Proverbs 26:27
we;re seeing a lot of this aren't we.
They overturned a case that gave individuals rights. They made the law. NORMALLY they don't take away personal rights ... in fact, they've never done it before ... unless you had a right to segregated school
Yes they did, liar. They deleted a constitutionally protected right.Yeah, they did. Look at the democrat party Supreme Court and Dredd Scott
And the court didn’t take any Right away from anyone….you twit…they stated the states have authority in making the laws on this
Was Fox claiming it was a hoax?
Yes they did, liar. They deleted a constitutionally protected right.
Oops, another lie. Tucker flat out said it was false.No….they stated no one could verify it and that the left wing news groups went with a story that had only one source, and couldn’t confirm the story
Wrong as always.Nope…….it isnt in the Constitution, so the states have jurisdiction
If you want to kill babies then vote for baby killing democrats in your state
Wrong as always.
The deleted a constitutionally protected, unenumerated right.
But you are so ignorant, you don't even know what that means.
They were all protecting the rapist who was here illegally. Mother, social worker, doctor. Why?
Wrong as always. It was a constitutionally protected, unenumerated right. But you are too ignorant to understand those words.Nope….the court, in their role as interpreters of the Constitution said it wasn’t… and simply said if you want to kill babies you have to do it through the states
cause this country doesnt give a flying phuck about children...proven over and over again with bs like this
No, as the majority stands in opposition to your embarrassing brand of insanity.Odd, this country is just what the people you voted for made it to be.
No exception for child rape in Ohio, Bones. CHILD FUCKING RAPE
I don't believe putting a 10 \year old through an abortion is better than taking care of her putting her in a loving kind gentle environment and allowing the baby to be born.
Matter of fact...in my mind i think it would be worse.
Democrat piece of shit scumbag liars.Who says the state forced this child to go through this?