Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the third time.....and do pay attention this time, please.......the computers, the evacuator and the files.
they haven't stolen anything yet, they're still in the building correct? I think one needs to leave with the materials to be burglary don't you think? And if the doors were open it isn't breaking and entering either. So dude so far you got jack.[
And they've taken property. Which is the very definition of theft.
What property? Specifically?
For the third time.....and do pay attention this time, please.......the computers, the evacuator and the files.
they haven't stolen anything yet, they're still in the building correct? I think one needs to leave with the materials to be burglary don't you think? And if the doors were open it isn't breaking and entering either. So dude so far you got jack.[
And they've taken property. Which is the very definition of theft.
What property? Specifically?
For the third time.....and do pay attention this time, please.......the computers, the evacuator and the files.
seize a federal building? how did they do that? if it's abandoned then there are no files, so your point is useless.isn't there something called the freedom of information act? I mean, do you know what country you live in?Fascinating...so you can walk into any government building or land and walk away with anything you want? That would be a big surprise to all those government workers who have been prosecuted for "stealing" government property over the years.They haven't stolen shit, lol. Progressives think that government "property" are holy relics lol.they have stolen files information computers they are tearing down fences they are taking heavy equipment and using it to tear up fences ....oh yeah ...they have closed down schools for a week....they have stolen the domestic tranquility of the community
They've stolen computers and heavy equipment?
Like most Communists, you just make shit up.
Can you show me anywhere in the Freedom of Information Act where anyone can just seize a federal building and start looting its files.
Because I'm pretty sure you've imagined it.
why would I want to do that? I have nothing against the post office nor do I care the mail that goes through there it isn't theirs.they haven't stolen anything yet, they're still in the building correct? I think one needs to leave with the materials to be burglary don't you think? And if the doors were open it isn't breaking and entering either. So dude so far you got jack.[
And they've taken property. Which is the very definition of theft.
What property? Specifically?
For the third time.....and do pay attention this time, please.......the computers, the evacuator and the files.
Go into a post office and start moving around the stamp machine, maybe block the door with it...we'll see what you get charged with, shall we?
Personally....I'd like to see they take the advice of those on this thread saying what they are doing isn't against the law..............and try it on another piece of federal property......Camp Pendleton.they haven't stolen anything yet, they're still in the building correct? I think one needs to leave with the materials to be burglary don't you think? And if the doors were open it isn't breaking and entering either. So dude so far you got jack.[
And they've taken property. Which is the very definition of theft.
What property? Specifically?
For the third time.....and do pay attention this time, please.......the computers, the evacuator and the files.
Of course they have. They've taken possession of all three and denied possession of all three to their rightful owners. That's theft.
And the doors weren't open.
So far we've got breaking and entering, seditious conspiracy, burglary, theft, destruction of property, and trespass.
They're looking at 30 years or potential time in jail so far. And they're just getting started.
you know this? you've seen the fbi reports? really? I think you have your head buried somewhere and in the air isn't the place I'm thinking of. You know shit at this moment and you are babbling like a brook.they haven't stolen anything yet, they're still in the building correct? I think one needs to leave with the materials to be burglary don't you think? And if the doors were open it isn't breaking and entering either. So dude so far you got jack.[
And they've taken property. Which is the very definition of theft.
What property? Specifically?
For the third time.....and do pay attention this time, please.......the computers, the evacuator and the files.
Of course they have. They've taken possession of all three and denied possession of all three to their rightful owners. That's theft.
And the doors weren't open.
So far we've got breaking and entering, seditious conspiracy, burglary, theft, destruction of property, and trespass.
They're looking at 30 years or potential time in jail so far. And they're just getting started.
Nope. According to me, the Bundy group is going through files. Whether or not they're going through computer files is still undefined. As I've already said and you've quoted me saying.
Meaning that you're intentionally lying, and attributing to me a position I haven't adopted. Which is a strawman.
The fact that seditious conspirators have seized and taken possession of the computers, the evacutor and the files isn't in dispute. The conspirators have already admitted to all of it.
seize a federal building? how did they do that? if it's abandoned then there are no files, so your point is useless.isn't there something called the freedom of information act? I mean, do you know what country you live in?Fascinating...so you can walk into any government building or land and walk away with anything you want? That would be a big surprise to all those government workers who have been prosecuted for "stealing" government property over the years.They haven't stolen shit, lol. Progressives think that government "property" are holy relics lol.They've stolen computers and heavy equipment?
Like most Communists, you just make shit up.
Can you show me anywhere in the Freedom of Information Act where anyone can just seize a federal building and start looting its files.
Because I'm pretty sure you've imagined it.
[
If it is empty, that means there's nothing in there. Doesn't seem to be the facts, does it?
I did not imagine the freedom of information act: here link:isn't there something called the freedom of information act? I mean, do you know what country you live in?Fascinating...so you can walk into any government building or land and walk away with anything you want? That would be a big surprise to all those government workers who have been prosecuted for "stealing" government property over the years.They haven't stolen shit, lol. Progressives think that government "property" are holy relics lol.they have stolen files information computers they are tearing down fences they are taking heavy equipment and using it to tear up fences ....oh yeah ...they have closed down schools for a week....they have stolen the domestic tranquility of the community
They've stolen computers and heavy equipment?
Like most Communists, you just make shit up.
Can you show me anywhere in the Freedom of Information Act where anyone can just seize a federal building and start looting its files.
Because I'm pretty sure you've imagined it.
What does that have to do with whether the buildings are empty or not, Don Quixote?[
If it is empty, that means there's nothing in there. Doesn't seem to be the facts, does it?
So smart girl, did Bundy take hostages? Did he drive the BLM out at gun point?
Hmmmm?
it is if I'm away from it for over 24 hours. you should really look up the term.seize a federal building? how did they do that? if it's abandoned then there are no files, so your point is useless.isn't there something called the freedom of information act? I mean, do you know what country you live in?Fascinating...so you can walk into any government building or land and walk away with anything you want? That would be a big surprise to all those government workers who have been prosecuted for "stealing" government property over the years.They haven't stolen shit, lol. Progressives think that government "property" are holy relics lol.
Can you show me anywhere in the Freedom of Information Act where anyone can just seize a federal building and start looting its files.
Because I'm pretty sure you've imagined it.
Who says the buidling as 'abandoned'? By your standards, every time you leave your house its been 'abandoned' and thus anyone can just move in.
The words you're looking for are 'went home for the weekend'.
The only one saying its been 'abandoned' is you citing yourself. Which is legally meaningless.
Nope. According to me, the Bundy group is going through files. Whether or not they're going through computer files is still undefined. As I've already said and you've quoted me saying.
Meaning that you're intentionally lying, and attributing to me a position I haven't adopted. Which is a strawman.
The fact that seditious conspirators have seized and taken possession of the computers, the evacutor and the files isn't in dispute. The conspirators have already admitted to all of it.
Oh, I am lying? You mean I'm the one claiming they "stole" computers that are still in the building?
Oh and Pinocchio, where did they take the "evacuator?"
good thing you have an ass for anchor, cause dude you're getting out there.Nope. According to me, the Bundy group is going through files. Whether or not they're going through computer files is still undefined. As I've already said and you've quoted me saying.
Meaning that you're intentionally lying, and attributing to me a position I haven't adopted. Which is a strawman.
The fact that seditious conspirators have seized and taken possession of the computers, the evacutor and the files isn't in dispute. The conspirators have already admitted to all of it.
Oh, I am lying? You mean I'm the one claiming they "stole" computers that are still in the building?
You're that lied and claimed 'According to Skylar, the Bundy group is going through computer files.'
You know that's not my position. You've quoted me saying otherwise. You intentionally lied, intentionally misrepresented my position.
If your claims had merit, you wouldn't have had to lie or use the Strawman fallacy.
Oh and Pinocchio, where did they take the "evacuator?"
From where its rightful owners left it. Possession was deprived from its rightful owners with the seditious conspirators taking possession and use of the same. With the seditious conspirators then using it to destroy government property.
And stupidly, admitting to it.
it is if I'm away from it for over 24 hours. you should really look up the term.seize a federal building? how did they do that? if it's abandoned then there are no files, so your point is useless.isn't there something called the freedom of information act? I mean, do you know what country you live in?Fascinating...so you can walk into any government building or land and walk away with anything you want? That would be a big surprise to all those government workers who have been prosecuted for "stealing" government property over the years.
Can you show me anywhere in the Freedom of Information Act where anyone can just seize a federal building and start looting its files.
Because I'm pretty sure you've imagined it.
Who says the buidling as 'abandoned'? By your standards, every time you leave your house its been 'abandoned' and thus anyone can just move in.
The words you're looking for are 'went home for the weekend'.
The only one saying its been 'abandoned' is you citing yourself. Which is legally meaningless.
good thing you have an ass for anchor, cause dude you're getting out there.Nope. According to me, the Bundy group is going through files. Whether or not they're going through computer files is still undefined. As I've already said and you've quoted me saying.
Meaning that you're intentionally lying, and attributing to me a position I haven't adopted. Which is a strawman.
The fact that seditious conspirators have seized and taken possession of the computers, the evacutor and the files isn't in dispute. The conspirators have already admitted to all of it.
Oh, I am lying? You mean I'm the one claiming they "stole" computers that are still in the building?
You're that lied and claimed 'According to Skylar, the Bundy group is going through computer files.'
You know that's not my position. You've quoted me saying otherwise. You intentionally lied, intentionally misrepresented my position.
If your claims had merit, you wouldn't have had to lie or use the Strawman fallacy.
Oh and Pinocchio, where did they take the "evacuator?"
From where its rightful owners left it. Possession was deprived from its rightful owners with the seditious conspirators taking possession and use of the same. With the seditious conspirators then using it to destroy government property.
And stupidly, admitting to it.
Personal property left by an owner who intentionally relinquishes all rights to its control. Real property may not be abandoned.
Abandoned Property
What does that have to do with whether the buildings are empty or not, Don Quixote?
