JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- 2,220
Arson can be used to destroy evidence sure, but what other evidence is there that the Hammonds did any poaching? Why would they when they owned plenty of their own land to hunt pests on?is arson to cover up poaching a common practice?Yawn, lol. Backfires are COMMON. The BLM and the property owners in that area are in a collaborative relationship...they help each other fight fires. BACKFIRES are a common and widely used method for controlling fires, and that is exactly what the Hammonds employed. Their backfire destroyed about 140 acres of scrub. The BLM is famous for torching tracts that destroy tens of thousands of acres, and destroy equipment, property, and livestock. This is nothing.Well, let's look at the Facts, shall we?It obviously was or you would make plain what you think it really was, idiot.Oh? It was just a grass burn? You want to go with that? Sure?
'We Are Going to Light Up the Whole Country on Fire': The Arson That Led to the Oregon Militia Standoff | VICE News
Know what a "wildfire" is? Know what fast moving 8-10 foot high flames look like? Think it's ok to commit arson to cover up another crime? Think it's ok to commit arson and endanger firefighters already in the area?