Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i) he loves "the troops"He always says he loves "the troops" but when he has dealt with military types on an individual basis, especially when they criticize him, he's kind of a jerk.you do not have enough evidence to JUMP to that conclusionIt's not dead because it's entirely plausible. Trump's dealings with all these ex-generals and other assorted military personnel is a good example of how he feels about military service. It counts for nothing with him.
He always says he loves "the troops" but when he has dealt with military types on an individual basis, especially when they criticize him, he's kind of a jerk.It's not dead because it's entirely plausible. Trump's dealings with all these ex-generals and other assorted military personnel is a good example of how he feels about military service. It counts for nothing with him.
you do not have enough evidence to JUMP to that conclusion
McCain was a useless Rhino and professional taxpayer tit sucker.It's only dead in the minds of Trumpsters.
"I like people who weren't captured".
He was picking on McCain, and deservedly so. No one else.
Obammy should never have said that
it's dead because the editor said it isIt's only dead in the minds of Trumpsters.
"I like people who weren't captured".
More of Trump's suckers and losers:
It's only dead in the minds of Trumpsters.
"I like people who weren't captured".
You're sick.All americans like people who weren't captured. Why do you am want our soldiers captured and tortured?It's only dead in the minds of Trumpsters.
"I like people who weren't captured".
triggered ^^^^^^^^^Wesley Clark? That's the best deflection you can come up with?And yet, you said nothing when Obama surrogate Wesley Clark expressed a similar thought:You're sick.All americans like people who weren't captured. Why do you am want our soldiers captured and tortured?It's only dead in the minds of Trumpsters.
"I like people who weren't captured".
Clark responded: “Well, I don’t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president.”
"Attacking" McCain's Military Record - Columbia Journalism Review
What Wesley Clark really said; how the press missed itarchives.cjr.org
Trump: "I like people who weren't captured". Insulting every last POW in American history.
But you're fine with that.
Adults know when criticism is justified and how to answer it like an adult.i) he loves "the troops"He always says he loves "the troops" but when he has dealt with military types on an individual basis, especially when they criticize him, he's kind of a jerk.you do not have enough evidence to JUMP to that conclusionIt's not dead because it's entirely plausible. Trump's dealings with all these ex-generals and other assorted military personnel is a good example of how he feels about military service. It counts for nothing with him.
ii) when they criticize him, he's kind of a jerk
Those aren't mutually incompatible propositions.
There is no one in your life who you love, and who you will also be criticize, if they criticize you?
It is dead because a named source on the record discredited it while anonymous sources started it. See the difference? You can choose to believe anonymous over named, but it's not a great idea.It's not dead because it's entirely plausible. Trump's dealings with all these ex-generals and other assorted military personnel is a good example of how he feels about military service. It counts for nothing with him.
It's not dead because it's entirely plausible. Trump's dealings with all these ex-generals and other assorted military personnel is a good example of how he feels about military service. It counts for nothing with him.
Not if they verified the sources and found them credible.
Those who are aware of who said it and corroborated it are sticking by the story
thefederalist.com
So let's get them on the record and named so we can judge their credibility for ourselves.Not if they verified the sources and found them credible.A story based on anonymous sources is inherently unreliable and Atlantic's editors broke journalism rules of ethics to publish it.
Those who are aware of who said it and corroborated it are sticking by the story
He never said I don’t like people who were capturedTrump: "I like people who weren't captured". Insulting every last POW in American history
You don't understand. To the liberal mind, narrative is more important than facts or reality. Thus, they will continue insisting this happened no matter who says it didn't. I do believe they would not hesitate to say that the source of the narrative is lying should it disavow what it started. Heck, they insisted that the Ukrainians were lying when they said there was no pressure from TRUMP!. They preferred their own narrative to the "victim's" statement.it's dead because the editor said it isIt's only dead in the minds of Trumpsters.
"I like people who weren't captured".
I labeled the Atlantic article fake news right away.The Atlantic Hoax is Dead – Bring on the Next Hoax!
7 Sep 2020 ~~ By David Blackmon
So, The Atlantic’s “Trump hates the military” hoax died on the vine after about a 24-hour run. It died for the simple reason that Trump’s public actions consistently in favor of the interests of the U.S. military and its personnel and retirees rendered the anonymously-sourced hit piece transparently unbelievable to anyone with functioning synapses in their cranial cavity, which of course excludes China Joe Biden.
The obvious hope of the Biden/Harris campaign and its corrupt media toadies was that this particular hoax would lead thousands of Trump supporters to finally abandon him out of disgust. Yeah, that’s not going to happen.
No passenger on the Trump Train is leaping off over this story or for any other reason. The only disgust expressed by any real Trump supporter towards anyone involved in the obvious hoax is toward Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg, the Atlantic’s corrupt owner who is also the poisonous Black Widow of Steve Jobs, and all the other Democrat media toadies like Jake Tapper and Jennifer Griffin who did everything they could to amplify it.
~[snip]~
Think about it: Among your circle of friends, co-workers and acquaintances, do you know a single Trump supporter who has said he/she is going to vote for Creepy Uncle McWifeMolester on November 3? Of course you don’t because those people do not exist.
The corrupt media continues to trot out this parade of “former Bush officials” and “former McCain campaign workers” and “former Romney people” who claim to be all like ‘Republicans’ and stuff and who just hate Trump and have signed a letter condemning him along with 400 of their fellow sippers of cheap zinfandel, but so what?
~[snip]~
The Atlantic hoax has failed. Miserably. Gloriously. A truly epic fail.
Lacking any other alternative, the Democrats and their media toadies will simply mount the next hoax. We don’t know what form it will take or exactly when it will come, but we do know this: It will also be an epic fail, and it will be glorious.
That is all.
Comment:
What they did was put out the ultimate LIE that proves that everything they say is a lie. When it isn't a lie it's still a lie because truth is often determined by context and the context of their lies is always a false narrative.
Harris/Bide and their deep state, MIC, and RINO collaborationists have extended the legal principal of 'falsus in uno falsus in omnibus to falsus in pluribus falsus in omnibus.' (Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - Wikipedia )
They have lied about so many things so consistently that we just have to assume every word out of their mouths every dot on a printed page is a lie. And our ears are closed to the notion that it could be otherwise.
It's like the lie "the threat is not China, it's Russia," a lie on which Tim Cook and Jobs's the Atlantic owning widow have been trying to bet their fortunes. Once Biden becomes zombie President do you think the CCP is going to refrain from taking everything they want, Apple and Taiwan included. What are we going to do - risk nuclear war? A question you have to turn around on the Chinese and convince them there is a very very bright red white and blue line in the Ocean starting 6 miles off the Chinese coast-line.
They can bet their own fortunes, but we refuse to have them use ours in their efforts. They can't bet ours and that is what they are trying to do.
Consider this.
Why would *any* voter to pick the party of violent rapists, murderers, arsonists, rioters and looters over the GOP at a time when Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat prosecutors are aiding criminals instead of prosecuting them?
PMS/DSA Democrat Leftists want productive people harnessed to their communist schemes or dead. To the Dems, we are the kulaks that Stalin killed by the millions - wreckers and saboteurs and enemies of the state. Why would any productive person vote Democrat? It’s like voting yourself into the grave.
Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Leftists are going for broke to eliminate Trump and the GOP... They have failed and they are well aware of their failure. They have only one option Left and are scared to use it...
www.usmessageboard.com
You libscum are nothing but liars.
Think of them better than jane fonda the traitor whore. Libscum are idiots."Fake News": The last refuge of the obedient Trumpster.Fake News. No one is fooled. Very telling that Biden and The Ho are reduced to this already.More of Trump's suckers and losers:
Those are, indeed, American POWs. I know what you think of them.
