Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The law seems a bit absurd to me but I have to admit in my "head" life seems to begin every time I see sexy curves with little to nothing covering them. Or occasionally not so sexy if I've had a few too many to drink.
Not if you think about it..... what they are trying to stop is the morning after pill.
I have no problem with the pill.
I wonder what would stop say a woman from say going to a more friendly state for these kinds of services? or say an enterprising person to perhaps offer transportation to and from those facilities out of state? Much like the prescription express bus was to Mexico from here, given the current climate here in Arizona am sure it would not take too long for the good folks at the Center for Arizona Policy to get a bill passed making that somehow a no no as well.
Here I've been celebrating my birthday nine months prematurely!
If life begins at conception, does the presence of an in vitro fertilization clinic affect census numbers? Can a pregnant woman drive in the HOV lane if she's carrying twins?
Give Mississippi credit for once. They voted down the lunacy that was the 'personhood' amendment. How many times can we cite Mississippi for being smarter than any other state?
Here I've been celebrating my birthday nine months prematurely!
If life begins at conception, does the presence of an in vitro fertilization clinic affect census numbers? Can a pregnant woman drive in the HOV lane if she's carrying twins?
Give Mississippi credit for once. They voted down the lunacy that was the 'personhood' amendment. How many times can we cite Mississippi for being smarter than any other state?
I wonder what would stop say a woman from say going to a more friendly state for these kinds of services? or say an enterprising person to perhaps offer transportation to and from those facilities out of state? Much like the prescription express bus was to Mexico from here, given the current climate here in Arizona am sure it would not take too long for the good folks at the Center for Arizona Policy to get a bill passed making that somehow a no no as well.
what would stop her?
work...
cost...
that is why in a place like North Dakota, where there is maybe one practitioner within 500 miles and that practitioner spends one day in this place and one day in that place, a 3 day waiting period is specifically intended to make the doctor's services unavailable.
it won't affect people with money at all. it never did.
AZ is a haven for retirees how do you think rhetoric to do away with Medicare and such goes over with the oldsters?
Why not force the abortion clinics to determine the age of the baby with the highest degree of accuracy possible?
By refusing to allow this to happen, you are saying you're okay with substandard services.
Which of course, leads to more botched abortions.
But that's okay with progressives, because the main objective has never been the safety of the female. The #1 priority has ALWAYS been to kill the baby. Regardless of the consequences.
AZ is a haven for retirees how do you think rhetoric to do away with Medicare and such goes over with the oldsters?
Too funny because Arizona is the wonderous destination from so many Canucks who've paid thousands and thousands of dollars into our failing health care system.
They know the truth.
Here I've been celebrating my birthday nine months prematurely!
If life begins at conception, does the presence of an in vitro fertilization clinic affect census numbers? Can a pregnant woman drive in the HOV lane if she's carrying twins?
Give Mississippi credit for once. They voted down the lunacy that was the 'personhood' amendment. How many times can we cite Mississippi for being smarter than any other state?
what hapopens when you separate a fetus from the palcenta?
It dies.
How can something die that was never alive to begin with?
Why does it need the palcenta to live?
Becuase it requires human blood, human hormones and himan antibodies to live.
Other than a human, what else requires human blood, human hormones, and human antibodies to live?
Nothing. Just humans.
TYherefore...according to basic science......the fetus is a live human.
I have the pro choice position becuase I see the logic and respect what the pro choicers say.
Why are those on the left unable to see the logic and respect what the right sees? Afterall, as I demonstrated in this post...there is absolute scientific logic that backs up the claim of the right.
a tooth. Separate a tooth from a blood supply, it dies.Here I've been celebrating my birthday nine months prematurely!
If life begins at conception, does the presence of an in vitro fertilization clinic affect census numbers? Can a pregnant woman drive in the HOV lane if she's carrying twins?
Give Mississippi credit for once. They voted down the lunacy that was the 'personhood' amendment. How many times can we cite Mississippi for being smarter than any other state?
what hapopens when you separate a fetus from the palcenta?
It dies.
How can something die that was never alive to begin with?
Why does it need the palcenta to live?
Becuase it requires human blood, human hormones and himan antibodies to live.
Other than a human, what else requires human blood, human hormones, and human antibodies to live?
Nothing. Just humans.
TYherefore...according to basic science......the fetus is a live human.
I have the pro choice position becuase I see the logic and respect what the pro choicers say.
Why are those on the left unable to see the logic and respect what the right sees? Afterall, as I demonstrated in this post...there is absolute scientific logic that backs up the claim of the right.
the allegedly 'small government GOP'er Jan Brewer has signed into law saying, essentially, life begins two weeks before conception.
so now, every time you ovulate...congrats you're a mom.
nutters...
AllGov - News - Arizona Law Declares Life Begins before Conception: Update
the statute...one of the most disgusting i've ever read.
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf
I wonder what would stop say a woman from say going to a more friendly state for these kinds of services? or say an enterprising person to perhaps offer transportation to and from those facilities out of state? Much like the prescription express bus was to Mexico from here, given the current climate here in Arizona am sure it would not take too long for the good folks at the Center for Arizona Policy to get a bill passed making that somehow a no no as well.
what would stop her?
work...
cost...
that is why in a place like North Dakota, where there is maybe one practitioner within 500 miles and that practitioner spends one day in this place and one day in that place, a 3 day waiting period is specifically intended to make the doctor's services unavailable.
it won't affect people with money at all. it never did.
Ah so then jillian if one can be creative with legislating issues such as these one one state lets say thats not so friendly, they can be friendly in the next state that is , say perhaps, Oh I don't know let's call it "future women of california project" wherein a bus stops in Phoenix everyday picks up goes to California where they pay for a taxed based service that California gets the benefits from and then are returned home? Just a thought, and for the more free enterprise types, there is always starting your own " shuttle service". I suppose my point here is not to make light of the situtation but more so to point out that while states may pass laws that restrict choice based on some moral ground, there are others that do not and noting is forever, meaning that in a state like Arizona which is changing rapidly in its demographics where one day it will be more than likely blue, even these types of laws won't last long. So I go back to my original thought on the matter , when a legislature especially in todays economy seeks to legislate what is clearly a moral issue from one point of view, they take their collective eye's off the real problems here which are numerous.
False OP fails.
Don't trust slanted rags for your news.
Read the bill.
Here are the definitions outlined in the bill.
I'll paste real slow.
"Conception" means the fusion of a human spermatozoon with a human ovum.
"Gestational age" means the age of the unborn child as calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period of the pregnant woman.
"Pregnant" or "pregnancy" means a female reproductive condition of having a developing unborn child in the body and that begins with conception.
Can anyone find where the bill attempts to define when "life begins"??
That's what I thought.
/
Use contraception and screw your brains out if that's your thing but don't make me pay for your good time.
I pay for my own good time. You should try it it's rewarding.
Use contraception and screw your brains out if that's your thing but don't make me pay for your good time.
I pay for my own good time. You should try it it's rewarding.
a tooth. Separate a tooth from a blood supply, it dies.Here I've been celebrating my birthday nine months prematurely!
If life begins at conception, does the presence of an in vitro fertilization clinic affect census numbers? Can a pregnant woman drive in the HOV lane if she's carrying twins?
Give Mississippi credit for once. They voted down the lunacy that was the 'personhood' amendment. How many times can we cite Mississippi for being smarter than any other state?
what hapopens when you separate a fetus from the palcenta?
It dies.
How can something die that was never alive to begin with?
Why does it need the palcenta to live?
Becuase it requires human blood, human hormones and himan antibodies to live.
Other than a human, what else requires human blood, human hormones, and human antibodies to live?
Nothing. Just humans.
TYherefore...according to basic science......the fetus is a live human.
I have the pro choice position becuase I see the logic and respect what the pro choicers say.
Why are those on the left unable to see the logic and respect what the right sees? Afterall, as I demonstrated in this post...there is absolute scientific logic that backs up the claim of the right.
An embryo is not a human.