Backwards Anderson Cooper Depriving a Child of Its Mother

[Syriusly]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

 

[WinterBorn]

There is no difference between homosexuals and child molesters.

If you believe this, you are an idiot.

 

[Sunni Man]

If you believe this, you are an idiot.

If you deny it, you are an idiot. ...

 

[Erinwltr]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Dayum, you really are Ignorant.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

So why are you forceably seperating kids from their parents at the border?

Cause you can't put children in an adult jail. D'uh.

And you don’t have to put all those adults in jail either. Keep making excuses for child abuse.

Sure we do. You libs won't let us just send them back.

Numerous other administrations kept families together. Until you. Party of child abuse.

Numerous other administrations were not serious about deporting the tens of millions of illegals in this country.

You want an open border, be honest about it with the American people. Make the policy, make the case and defend it.


Don't hide behind children.

Nope. Don't want an open border. That's your constant false dichotomy position: either you support abusing children or you support an open border.

I'm calling you on it. Those are not the only choices and the fact you actively support one of those choices is appalling.

That is a false dichotomy, you're right. Because open borders harm far more children than closed borders. Those who support open borders support child rape, child abuse, rape of women, sex trafficking of young girls.

I don't think you understand what a false dichotomy is.

If I don't then you don't. I agreed with you that Corell gave you a pair of choices that didn't represent the only options... That was the only context of anything I said that had any thing to do with a false dichotomy.

Then I gave you the facts about child harm from open borders... Nothing to do with your correct claim of Corell's false dichotomy. So, if agreeing with you is evidence I don't understand what a false dichotomy is, well, I won't accept your current claim that I don't understand but I'll accept your confession that you don't, if that's the story you want to stick with.

 

[Levant]

It's Anderson Cooper. To him mothers are never necessary or wanted.

Anderson Cooper, talking about when his mother was dying:
"When I die that might be the thing I'm most proud of. I'm happy that we left nothing unsaid between us. She knew me and I knew her, and there's great comfort in that," he said. "'You and I, it's a match made in heaven,' she said to me last week. 'We're a good team,' I told her. We stayed up late that night just holding hands and when she got sleepy ... she said to me, 'What a wonderful night.' And it was."

But then again I don't expect a homophobic racist like yourself to really understand how a son can love his mother.

How does loving his mother prove he thinks mothers are important? His own son will never know a mother... Cooper doesn't think mothers matter. And, of course, he waited until after his mother died before creating his motherless son.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

And depriving a kid of his parents is Ok. Human rights violator. Creepy. And way more kids are at risk because of unstructured families than the anomalous that you use as an excuse. More empirical data and facts that leftovers like you are so appalled by. You’re just another ultra-con.

Your "depriving a kid of his parents" is ridiculous. Who thought it up?

You’re backwards. You need to progress.

Nothing supports your irrational argument, but this is usually true of right-wingers' wild accusations, regardless of your moronic misuse of language used by progressives. Studies. Data. Conclusions of medical professionals and professional societies like the American Psychological Association. Crime statistics. They all would be nice to see.

Every predominantly black jurisdiction in this country bears out the empirical data. And it transcends economics.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

So why are you forceably seperating kids from their parents at the border?

Cause you can't put children in an adult jail. D'uh.

And you don’t have to put all those adults in jail either. Keep making excuses for child abuse.

Sure we do. You libs won't let us just send them back.

Numerous other administrations kept families together. Until you. Party of child abuse.

Numerous other administrations were not serious about deporting the tens of millions of illegals in this country.

You want an open border, be honest about it with the American people. Make the policy, make the case and defend it.


Don't hide behind children.

Nope. Don't want an open border. That's your constant false dichotomy position: either you support abusing children or you support an open border.

I'm calling you on it. Those are not the only choices and the fact you actively support one of those choices is appalling.

That is a false dichotomy, you're right. Because open borders harm far more children than closed borders. Those who support open borders support child rape, child abuse, rape of women, sex trafficking of young girls.

That is a false dichotomy.

Because virtually no one supports 'open borders'- America had open borders for the majority of our existence. But we haven't had open borders since about 1900.

Of course what you mean by a 'closed border' is separating children from their mothers and keeping them in cages. That is not a 'closed border'- that is just child abuse.

Your child abuse claim will hold much more sway when you post links to your complaints about Obama starting the program of doing so. Trump, humanitarian that he is, ended the program.

A closed border is not what led to children being separated from their parents, though. Let alone that criminal parents have their children separated from them all the time and it absolutely must be so.

But what led to children being separated is actually the open border. Parents broke United States and international law by entering the United States illegally. A properly protected and closed border would prevent such entries and t hose parents and children would not have been separated. Weak and open borders harm children, women, young girls, and, ultimately, all Americans. There's no false dichotomy in that.

 

[WinterBorn]

If you believe this, you are an idiot.

If you deny it, you are an idiot. ...

One is attracted to the same gender. One is attracted to children.
One has relationships with consenting adults. One does not.

No, they are not the same.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

So why are you forceably seperating kids from their parents at the border?

Cause you can't put children in an adult jail. D'uh.

And you don’t have to put all those adults in jail either. Keep making excuses for child abuse.

Sure we do. You libs won't let us just send them back.

Numerous other administrations kept families together. Until you. Party of child abuse.

Numerous other administrations were not serious about deporting the tens of millions of illegals in this country.

You want an open border, be honest about it with the American people. Make the policy, make the case and defend it.


Don't hide behind children.

Nope. Don't want an open border. That's your constant false dichotomy position: either you support abusing children or you support an open border.

I'm calling you on it. Those are not the only choices and the fact you actively support one of those choices is appalling.

That is a false dichotomy, you're right. Because open borders harm far more children than closed borders. Those who support open borders support child rape, child abuse, rape of women, sex trafficking of young girls.

That is a false dichotomy.

Because virtually no one supports 'open borders'- America had open borders for the majority of our existence. But we haven't had open borders since about 1900.

Of course what you mean by a 'closed border' is separating children from their mothers and keeping them in cages. That is not a 'closed border'- that is just child abuse.

And I forgot to address your falsehood that virtually no one supports open borders.

AOC’s latest: Only Nazis oppose open borders


JUST LISTEN TO JOE BIDEN: ” I respect no borders…and cannot be contained by any walls.”

Hillary Clinton in 2013 said she dreams of a “common market with open trade and open borders,”

Yes, Democrats and Republicans alike want open borders. Very few admit it and they talk circles around it, but sometimes they let their true agendas slip into the public discourse.

 

[Levant]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

 

[WinterBorn]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

 

[skye]

The is only one reason that homo's want to have young kids, "and it aint good". ..

I know exactly what you mean....and it is so horrible.....it happens all the time I hope it's not like that with the Vanderblit/Cooper person.

 

[Oldestyle]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!

 

[Dekster]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

I am more concerned that he waited until he was so old to have the kid. Kid could be an orphan before it graduates college

He's only 52. That's my age and my wife wants at least 2 more kids.

You are too old to be having kids. It is selfish and unfair to the children.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!

The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.

 

[Lysistrata]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

And depriving a kid of his parents is Ok. Human rights violator. Creepy. And way more kids are at risk because of unstructured families than the anomalous that you use as an excuse. More empirical data and facts that leftovers like you are so appalled by. You’re just another ultra-con.

Your "depriving a kid of his parents" is ridiculous. Who thought it up?

You’re backwards. You need to progress.

Nothing supports your irrational argument, but this is usually true of right-wingers' wild accusations, regardless of your moronic misuse of language used by progressives. Studies. Data. Conclusions of medical professionals and professional societies like the American Psychological Association. Crime statistics. They all would be nice to see.

Every predominantly black jurisdiction in this country bears out the empirical data. And it transcends economics.

Introducing race into this discussion is inappropriate, raising a suspicion that you are a racist. Moreover, there is no empirical data that factors in the sexual orientation of the parents, in concluding that, in general, children raised in two-parent families generally are thought to be better off. There are plenty of single parents, and also plenty of households in which only one of the parents actually is raising the children and the other parent just lives there without shouldering any of the responsibility.

 

[Muhammed]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

I am more concerned that he waited until he was so old to have the kid. Kid could be an orphan before it graduates college

He's only 52. That's my age and my wife wants at least 2 more kids.

You are too old to be having kids. It is selfish and unfair to the children.

Could you explain the reasoning that you used to come to those conclusions?

 

[two_iron]

Poor kid... hope he doesn't see his 2 daddies shit-dicking each other in the man cave.... or showing up at the breakfast table with jizz dripping from their eye brows....

He'll probably introduce his daddy as a cock-smoking homo in front of his 4th grade class and explain later "it was just too fucking embarrassing to say you worked for the fake news".....