Backwards Anderson Cooper Depriving a Child of Its Mother

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...


Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.
And depriving a kid of his parents is Ok. Human rights violator. Creepy. And way more kids are at risk because of unstructured families than the anomalous that you use as an excuse. More empirical data and facts that leftovers like you are so appalled by. You’re just another ultra-con.

Your "depriving a kid of his parents" is ridiculous. Who thought it up?
You’re backwards. You need to progress.

Nothing supports your irrational argument, but this is usually true of right-wingers' wild accusations, regardless of your moronic misuse of language used by progressives. Studies. Data. Conclusions of medical professionals and professional societies like the American Psychological Association. Crime statistics. They all would be nice to see.
Every predominantly black jurisdiction in this country bears out the empirical data. And it transcends economics.

Introducing race into this discussion is inappropriate, raising a suspicion that you are a racist. Moreover, there is no empirical data that factors in the sexual orientation of the parents, in concluding that, in general, children raised in two-parent families generally are thought to be better off. There are plenty of single parents, and also plenty of households in which only one of the parents actually is raising the children and the other parent just lives there without shouldering any of the responsibility.
Race in this case serves as an analysis factor because of neosegregation and subculture.
You lefties are so rigidly intolerant and predictable.Everything is about victim hood and pandering and excuses and deflection.
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...


Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.
Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.
‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

No idea why you think I said anything about best friends.

My biggest question is why we think we have to ask the gov't for permission to marry, and why so many benefits are given by federal state and local gov't.
 
..and they brainwash their kids that they are VICTIMS/whiners/etc

I have not heard of any gay or lesbian parent say anything like that.
jesus christ!! it's like the blacks chronically brainwashing their kids that they are VICTIMS
...I had a thread on this with examples
...you don't think they raise their kids telling them how they were/are bullied/etc???
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...


I am more concerned that he waited until he was so old to have the kid. Kid could be an orphan before it graduates college
.....he's 52? when the kid is 14 he'll be to old to be an efficient father/''mother''--like a lot of these jackasses having kids when they are 60 and 70

So this is the reason you don't like him being a parent? Because he is too old? I mean, its not like the tax payer will have to care for the child.
hahahhahahahah WRONG
..I'm not saying I don't like him for that
...I'm stating he cannot be an efficient/good/etc father because of it
....it's close----these bastards that have kids when they are 60 are jackasses---it takes time and effort to raise kids ....52 is still a little too late
....I'm in my years but in great shape--still I might be taxed if I had a 10 or 14 year old driving them around to ballgames/etc .....
...also--plain and simple--if you believe in evolution or creation, kids were not meant to be raised by 2 men
 
Absolute horseshit. They want children for the same reasons straight people want children.
Homo's want to raise kids to be gay so they and their friends can molest them. Sickening but true.

No, it is not true. The rate of children being gay is consistent, whether the parents are gay or straight. And the overwhelming majority of gay or lesbian parents do not molest their children. Those are the absolute facts.
We have many problems in our nation. Which ones are a priority? Everything has costs. So does the 80% of single parents in inner city areas take a back seat to the gay agendas? Because that is reality now.
 
..and they brainwash their kids that they are VICTIMS/whiners/etc

I have not heard of any gay or lesbian parent say anything like that.
jesus christ!! it's like the blacks chronically brainwashing their kids that they are VICTIMS
...I had a thread on this with examples
...you don't think they raise their kids telling them how they were/are bullied/etc???

You don't think they WERE bullied? Look at some of the vile responses on this thread. Someone asked if they got the sperm from inside his boyfriend's ass? Really
 
Absolute horseshit. They want children for the same reasons straight people want children.
Homo's want to raise kids to be gay so they and their friends can molest them. Sickening but true.

No, it is not true. The rate of children being gay is consistent, whether the parents are gay or straight. And the overwhelming majority of gay or lesbian parents do not molest their children. Those are the absolute facts.
We have many problems in our nation. Which ones are a priority? Everything has costs. So does the 80% of single parents in inner city areas take a back seat to the gay agendas? Because that is reality now.

How is a famous gay man having a child having any effect on single parents in inner cities?
 
..and they brainwash their kids that they are VICTIMS/whiners/etc

I have not heard of any gay or lesbian parent say anything like that.
jesus christ!! it's like the blacks chronically brainwashing their kids that they are VICTIMS
...I had a thread on this with examples
...you don't think they raise their kids telling them how they were/are bullied/etc???

You don't think they WERE bullied? Look at some of the vile responses on this thread. Someone asked if they got the sperm from inside his boyfriend's ass? Really

I was curious to see what you would think about it.
 
..and they brainwash their kids that they are VICTIMS/whiners/etc

I have not heard of any gay or lesbian parent say anything like that.
jesus christ!! it's like the blacks chronically brainwashing their kids that they are VICTIMS
...I had a thread on this with examples
...you don't think they raise their kids telling them how they were/are bullied/etc???

You don't think they WERE bullied? Look at some of the vile responses on this thread. Someone asked if they got the sperm from inside his boyfriend's ass? Really
many different types of people get bullied:
short
tall
fat
skinny
black
white
Asian
Latino
hetero
gay
etc etc
...Jussie Smollet is a PERFECT example!!!!!! black and gay--and so obsessed with race and gayness, that it WARPED his mind!!!!! ..here is a YOUNG black that never lived through slavery or the 60s, has mucho $$$$!!! and he HATES the POTUS for FALSE reasons!!!
...did you hear him sometimes?? he said something like ''I fought back'''
..OK OK so he was bullied, but his mind is still obsessed with gayness and blackness, that his thinking is warped
"And above all, I fought the fuck back," Smollett added as the crowd erupted in cheers and applause. "I'm the gay Tupac! So now, we can do our encore."
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!
The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.
I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!
The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.
I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!
...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!
The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.
I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!
...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?
I never said that. Sexual orientation isn't a deciding factor. You either are a good parent or you're not. If someone's a good parent why should it matter who they love? If someone is gay and not a good parent then they shouldn't have kids either. I know this is a hot button topic with many but it isn't with me. I judge people by their actions.
 
It's very dangerous for children be in a house with homo's in a pretend marriage.
They are like some kind of subhuman's engaging in animalistic sexual behavior, and might attack and molest the children at any time.
 
Last edited:
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!
The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.
I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!
...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?
I never said that. Sexual orientation isn't a deciding factor. You either are a good parent or you're not. If someone's a good parent why should it matter who they love? If someone is gay and not a good parent then they shouldn't have kids either. I know this is a hot button topic with many but it isn't with me. I judge people by their actions.
1. did you not see the links?
2. obviously kids are not meant to be raised by same sex people
so! it's better to have opposite sex for parents
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!
The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.
I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!
...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?
I never said that. Sexual orientation isn't a deciding factor. You either are a good parent or you're not. If someone's a good parent why should it matter who they love? If someone is gay and not a good parent then they shouldn't have kids either. I know this is a hot button topic with many but it isn't with me. I judge people by their actions.
..it's like the blacks.....a lot of them are obsessed with RACE so much that it warps their minds
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!
The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.
I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!
...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?
I never said that. Sexual orientation isn't a deciding factor. You either are a good parent or you're not. If someone's a good parent why should it matter who they love? If someone is gay and not a good parent then they shouldn't have kids either. I know this is a hot button topic with many but it isn't with me. I judge people by their actions.
..same with fat/short/tall/skinny/latino/big ears/etc etc....they ''grow up''' LIVING and breathing their perceived ''problem''' and it brainwashes them/warps their minds ...maybe not to the point like Jussie Smollet, but it has a significant effect
 
1588426254525.png
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!
The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.
I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!
...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?
I never said that. Sexual orientation isn't a deciding factor. You either are a good parent or you're not. If someone's a good parent why should it matter who they love? If someone is gay and not a good parent then they shouldn't have kids either. I know this is a hot button topic with many but it isn't with me. I judge people by their actions.
 
here it is--surely a jackass brain warped idiot HATER
COOPER is the hater
 
Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...




You are so far beyond sick.

I read the article yesterday and if I could, I would congratulate Anderson.

A new life is a blessing.

People like you are what's wrong with this nation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top