Backwards Anderson Cooper Depriving a Child of Its Mother

[Lysistrata]

I find them to be much better friends than hate-mongers who judge based on opinions rather than facts.

Preferring not to be around mentally ill fudge packers isn't hate. It's just a safety issue. They are prone to violence, and are known to randomly attack people opposed to their perverted lifestyle. ...

There is too much violence among heterosexuals (you know, men and women) to take your comment seriously. Why do you think that countries across the world have had to establish shelters for people (mostly women) fleeing heterosexual abuse? Why do nations like India have such a problem with violence among heterosexuals, including rape and murder?

 

[Lysistrata]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

And depriving a kid of his parents is Ok. Human rights violator. Creepy. And way more kids are at risk because of unstructured families than the anomalous that you use as an excuse. More empirical data and facts that leftovers like you are so appalled by. You’re just another ultra-con.

Your "depriving a kid of his parents" is ridiculous. Who thought it up?

You’re backwards. You need to progress.

Nothing supports your irrational argument, but this is usually true of right-wingers' wild accusations, regardless of your moronic misuse of language used by progressives. Studies. Data. Conclusions of medical professionals and professional societies like the American Psychological Association. Crime statistics. They all would be nice to see.

Every predominantly black jurisdiction in this country bears out the empirical data. And it transcends economics.

Introducing race into this discussion is inappropriate, raising a suspicion that you are a racist. Moreover, there is no empirical data that factors in the sexual orientation of the parents, in concluding that, in general, children raised in two-parent families generally are thought to be better off. There are plenty of single parents, and also plenty of households in which only one of the parents actually is raising the children and the other parent just lives there without shouldering any of the responsibility.

Race in this case serves as an analysis factor because of neosegregation and subculture.
You lefties are so rigidly intolerant and predictable.Everything is about victim hood and pandering and excuses and deflection.

What do you even mean by "neosegregation and subculture"? What do you mean by "lefties"? Do you deny that some heterosexual partners smack their partners around and don't pay any attention to their biological children, much less accept their duty to raise them, which involves so much more than merely sending a check? Don't fling around words like "victimhood" as some sort of pejorative when people actually are victims of another person's aggression. Do not deny that domestic violence is a problem in our culture and in many others. Race is not a factor. The cancer of heterosexual domestic violence occurs in all "races."

 

[theHawk]

Absolute horseshit. They want children for the same reasons straight people want children.

Homo's want to raise kids to be gay so they and their friends can molest them. Sickening but true.

No, it is not true. The rate of children being gay is consistent, whether the parents are gay or straight. And the overwhelming majority of gay or lesbian parents do not molest their children. Those are the absolute facts.

Do you have proof of this? No you don’t.

 

[theHawk]

I find them to be much better friends than hate-mongers who judge based on opinions rather than facts.

Preferring not to be around mentally ill fudge packers isn't hate. It's just a safety issue. They are prone to violence, and are known to randomly attack people opposed to their perverted lifestyle. ...

There is too much violence among heterosexuals (you know, men and women) to take your comment seriously. Why do you think that countries across the world have had to establish shelters for people (mostly women) fleeing heterosexual abuse? Why do nations like India have such a problem with violence among heterosexuals, including rape and murder?

Bullshit. Homosexuals are far more violent.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

 

[Lysistrata]

..and they brainwash their kids that they are VICTIMS/whiners/etc

I have not heard of any gay or lesbian parent say anything like that.

jesus christ!! it's like the blacks chronically brainwashing their kids that they are VICTIMS
...I had a thread on this with examples
...you don't think they raise their kids telling them how they were/are bullied/etc???

Don't pretend that there is no racism. Just the other day, a USMB poster referred to an adult American woman as a "groid sow." I had to goggle it to even know what he meant. It was disgusting. No matter what demographic group one is, s/he still has to educate their children how to cope with these attacks. Women, people of many ethnic backgrounds, many religions, LGBTs, have all been attacked, and we all must educate our children in how to cope with this shit and not yield ourselves to these freaks or submit to them.

 

[Wapasha]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

I am more concerned that he waited until he was so old to have the kid. Kid could be an orphan before it graduates college

I had the same thought when Richard Greer, age 69, just had his new son the other day. Even my grandfather decided that once he hit his 80s, he was not going to get a new dog.

 

[Lysistrata]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

Well. Yeah. A marriage has legal status. We are all "force[d]" to recognize and subsidize each other's marriages; your's, mine, trump's, pence's, even frankie graham's and falwell's. That's how it goes.

 

[Oldestyle]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!

The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.

I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!

You probably live in a mostly-non-Black neighborhood.

My neighbors on one side are both Hispanic...my neighbors on the other side are black and oriental. Across the street from me is a good ole boy from Alabama. We all get along just fine though. Good people are good people...all the racial shit is just that...SHIT!

 

[mdk]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Oh, don't start this crap again. There are and have been plenty of kids raised by only one parent, and I'm sure that Cooper will have a lot of help. Plus, he's much, much more interested in being a parent than some parents are. He volunteered to become a parent and had to arrange it, so it is highly unlikely that he will become one of those parents who, even if living with the other parent, spend more of their time on leisure activities and with friends or outside lovers than they spend raising their children.

He's interested only in training a new generation of homosexuals. Men who want to be fathers marry the woman they want to be the mother.

How does one "train" kids to be homosexual? I've never seen a study that shows children with gay parents having a higher rate of homosexuality than the regular population.

Most people marry who they love. And wanting children with that person is normal.

Considering that the vast, vast majority of all people were born to heterosexual parents, and raised by heterosexual parents who generally wanted to raise heterosexual children- I would say that 'training' children to be attracted to one gender or another doesn't appear to be working too well.

Parents have been duped into allowing their children to get their moral training from the socialists in the public schools. I remember a discussion with my granddaughter, after her high school graduation but before she started college, about a story on the news on TV. The story was about a woman who had a wife... In discussing the story, I referred to the woman as a lesbian. My granddaughter, and her visiting friend, were shocked that I would assume that a woman with a wife was a lesbian. What kind of right-wing monster was I?

Of course I was stunned. How in the world did I get that wrong? They explained to me that the woman might be bisexual. I had no right to assume any person's "gender" or sexual preference.

So, you're right. We're letting schools break down the family and destroy our values and causing real confusion in our children. It's something we'd better fix soon or the world as we know it is over.

Technically, your granddaughter was right.

But I question why it matters. The woman is married to another woman. Why is it a requirement that we categorize them as gay or bisexual? Unless you intend to try and seduce them, their sexual orientation doesn't matter. Or it shouldn't.

‘Best friends’ doesn’t earn tax breaks from the government. Homo marriage is as irrelevant as best friends so you defeat any argument for ‘legal’ homo marriage.

Marriages entered into by two persons are legal, so you don't have to put it in quotes.

Marriage is a concept. You can marry a blade of grass. It’s between you and the blade of grass. ‘Legal’ status forces everyone to recognize and subsidize your marriage. That’s the distinction.

The government has no business subsidizing marriage in the first place. That’s should be the real issue here, but you’re more concerned about pussy-aching about homos b/c you have an ax to grind.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I had the same thought when Richard Greer, age 69, just had his new son the other day. Even my grandfather decided that once he hit his 80s, he was not going to get a new dog.

How can anyone at that age even think about a new son? That is insane and they will both be in diapers about the same time. And I thought the same when old time Hollywood he men like Anthony Quinn and Mick Jagger, Steve Martin, Rod Stewart and Charlie Chaplin (fathered a child at 81)
had children well into their sixties and seventies and even beyond! Pure ego driven selfishness.

 

[Syriusly]

That's the sign of a true conservative. We may not like or agree with what another person does but we'll take to arms,. if necessary, to defend their right to do it.

What a load of bull. ...
I'm a conservative, but I'd never take up arms to defend the fudge packers right to raise up children in a homo pretend marriage.

No- you aren't a conservative- you are just a bigot.

 

[Syriusly]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

As long as there is true love there I don't have a problem with same sex parents having adopted kids or kids through a surrogate. Let's be honest here, Kiddies...there are a lot of traditional couples that should NEVER be allowed to have a child because they're terrible parents. If Anderson Cooper turns out to be a good dad then more power to him!

The data is in and its post-1960’s leftist. Kids are best off with their actual two parents, their mother and father, which every human in history has had. Alternatives should only be last resort, not optional.

I'm a conservative actually. I just don't have an issue with same sex marriage. To be quite blunt...with all of the other fucked up things we have to deal with these days...people that love each other...no matter what their sexual orientation...is way down on my list of "problems"! Kids are best off in a setting where there are parents who love them...and god knows there are traditional marriages where a couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid!

...and there are gay marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a pet let alone a kid
..you think just because they are gay they will be better at it?

Depression and same-sex parenting

New study finds adult children of same-sex parents are twice as likely to be depressed

world.wng.org

Facts About Suicide - The Trevor Project

Suicide is the second leading cause of death among young people aged 10 to 24.

www.thetrevorproject.org

And there are straight marriages where the couple shouldn't be allowed to have a house plant let alone a kid.

Yet I don't see you starting any threads about any of those couples.

 

[Syriusly]

I had the same thought when Richard Greer, age 69, just had his new son the other day. Even my grandfather decided that once he hit his 80s, he was not going to get a new dog.

How can anyone at that age even think about a new son? That is insane and they will both be in diapers about the same time. And I thought the same when old time Hollywood he men like Anthony Quinn and Mick Jagger, Steve Martin, Rod Stewart and Charlie Chaplin (fathered a child at 81)
had children well into their sixties and seventies and even beyond! Pure ego driven selfishness.

Anderson Cooper is 51- which is not a very unusual age to have a child- Trump was 59 when he became the father of Baron.

 

[Sunni Man]

No- you aren't a conservative- you are just a bigot.

Not wanting to be around people that have chosen to live a perverted lifestyle don't make me a bigot. ...

 

[Syriusly]

I find them to be much better friends than hate-mongers who judge based on opinions rather than facts.

Preferring not to be around mentally ill fudge packers isn't hate. It's just a safety issue. They are prone to violence, and are known to randomly attack people opposed to their perverted lifestyle. ...

There is too much violence among heterosexuals (you know, men and women) to take your comment seriously. Why do you think that countries across the world have had to establish shelters for people (mostly women) fleeing heterosexual abuse? Why do nations like India have such a problem with violence among heterosexuals, including rape and murder?

Bullshit. Homosexuals are far more violent.

to quote your your previous post- Do you have proof of this? No you don’t.

So glad to be able to provide your exact same words back to bite you.

 

[Syriusly]

No- you aren't a conservative- you are just a bigot.

Not wanting to be around people that have chosen to live a perverted lifestyle don't make me a bigot. ...

Everything you post shows you are a bigot.

 

[IM2]

Welcome back to the 1960’s cutting-edge democrat party and its propagandist media.
Kids need both of their parents and no human should ever be intentionally deprived of the opportunity to be raised by its actual parents. Human rights violations 101...

Anderson Cooper's special announcement: 'I am a dad. I have a son.'

Disingenuous. The woman bearing the child got paid to have it.

 

[Sunni Man]

Everything you post shows you are a bigot.

Actually, you are bigoted towards me for no reason. ...

 

[skye]

Anderson Cooper Vanderbilt is not mentally stable...in my opinion.

Since he saw his brother jumping from the balcony to his death.....he was never the same, and yes it is very sad and traumatic....he has been haunted all his life by his brother suicide.

He chose the wrong profession..... he should have not chosen journalism.