Bakers fined for not working homosexual "wedding" continue fighting for their freedoms

[Pop23]

There are no gay animals. There are animals that exhibit gay behavior when deprived of a suitable mate, but they are not gay.

I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?

 

[Pop23]

It's not really a matter of religion at all. It's just how it is. It's about what's natural and what's not. We are animals when it comes down to it and we have animal urges that if you look at them are pretty naturel. Homosexuality go's against the laws of nature. That's why there is a naturel aversion to homosexuality.

List of mammals displaying homosexual behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You and I can do Darwin and all that in the bull ring. All Darwin writings in all his books, we will keep it to what's avaliable to you on the 10% off rack at Barnes and Noble so you can play. That said, going by your assertion that homosexuality is perfectly normal then why diddnt the Lesions just kill the baker and all his staff and take the cake ? I mean all animals do it, he'll they wouldn't have to go that far how about some ritualized combat ? Or the gay people could have just snuk in and stole it. All alternatives would have been acceptable to you because you can find a list of animals that do it. There are two directives among all animals and they are way down in the "reptile braine". Those directives are, survive and propagate the species. Broken animals have what some call a suicide gene. When they are borne they reuse to eat and they die because they know they are broken. Happens with reptiles allot, frequently with puppies and kittens as well as a imams that tend to have litters, but I digress. The rags are wrong for forcing their will on other people.let consumers decided if it's bad or not.

How bi of you. On one hand you say "it ain't nachrul" then, when show it is perfectly natural, you say "dogs eat cat shit".

Come on, get it together. What's your argument "it ain't natural" or "so what if it's found in nature"?

So by your definition if they beat the bakers down and drilled him in the ass or even killed them you would be cool with that because your beloved great apes do that. By your logic, it's okay to kill and eat our children when times are hard because animals do it? Now to the homosexuality of those sit eating dogs you mentioned, by your logic you are fine with rape because dogs express domanance over their competitors beating their asses and dry humping the butt of the loser? Sorry there dude, homosexuality acts are done in nature first and for most because animals can't control them selves, and as an act of dominance over their kindaily not love. Homosexuality is not natural, or it is in that it keeps the weak and defective members of the species out of the gene pool. So I guess you are also,saying that gay humans are also inferior humans? When you want to get ino Darwin thoughts on the matter ?

Humans are animals. Some animals, including humans, are gay. This is natural and has existed since the beginning of time in all human races and in a lot of animal species. Some, like the human animal, mate for life. There are even very reasonable theories as to why some species have "the gays", including humans.

The evolutionary puzzle of homosexuality - BBC News

If being sexually oriented toward the same sex is a delusion for monkeys, it would follow that it would also be a delusion for Man.

Not seeing how this advances your argument.

 

[Seawytch]

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)

 

[Frank'sRules]

Have you been on the religion thread?

It's not really a matter of religion at all. It's just how it is. It's about what's natural and what's not. We are animals when it comes down to it and we have animal urges that if you look at them are pretty naturel. Homosexuality go's against the laws of nature. That's why there is a naturel aversion to homosexuality.

List of mammals displaying homosexual behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh, then all behavior that mammals display are protected rights?

Do I have your argument correct?

Obviously not. That would be an argument against homosexuality is always a choice when it actually only sometimes a choice. Nature doesn't mind gay creatures, you do.

You do realize that delusion is not just a Homo sapien issue, Right?

Homosexuality isn't a delusion unless you think it doesn't exist, and that is a delusion.

 

[Silhouette]

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)

I would think by now that it would have sunken into your brain Seawytch, especially after the 7th circuit just told the country, that race and deviant sex behaviors are not in the same legal or moral or any other type of category together.

Since you're striving to make a comparison, and you're talking about your deviant behaviors, it would be more accurate to say "Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument? The Jews about the nazis putting them to death in death camps." Behavior to behavior; not not-behavior to behavior.

And the nazis had behaviors that were well documented and understood. "LGBTQ" (speaking of delusions) is all over the map and even they aren't sure of their own leanings. Hence why lesbians seek out masculine looking women who use dildos; and gay men seek out the femme (bottom) types for an artificial vagina. I mean HELLO closeted-issues! If heteros were up to the counterpart behavior in their camp, the gays would be screaming "COME OUT OF THE CLOSET ALREADY!" to the rooftops. I guess it only works one way.....which of course then defies logical reasoning...which is the definition of delusional behavior and thoughts..

Behavior and thoughts....behavior and thoughts...........behavior and thoughts...........

 

[Mustang]

Christian Bakers Fined For Not Working Gay Wedding Continue Fighting For Their Freedoms

Good for them and the 2nd to last paragraph is spot on!

Tell them to contact Mark Levin. I'm sure he'd be willing to add a "baking amendement" to his list of numerous amendments to the US Constitution he's proposing to be taken up at an Article 5 Convention of the States.

Yes, Mark Levin loves the Constitution SO much that he's just chomping at the bit to make ALL kinds of changes to it.

What a patriot!

 

[WorldWatcher]

The perplexing aspect is that, other then those freedoms afforded under the bill of rights, all others in Title II of the civil rights act, except sexual orientation, can be objectively tested.

Perplexing, don't you think?

All characteristics mentioned in Title II have objective tests. So...

What is the objective test for religion? Religion is cited in Title II of the Civil Rights Act.


>>>>

 

[WorldWatcher]

I see your deflecting from the issue at hand.

You really think there are no objective tests for race or gender?

A black man claiming to be white can be subjected to a number of objective tests, as can a female claiming to be a male.

If a man, not sexually oriented toward other men, claimed to be gay. What objective test could be applied to prove we wasn't?

Perplexing.

A man claims to have found believe in Ahala the day before discriminating against a Jewish customer, what is your objective test to prove he didn't?

The owner of Piggie Park that claimed it was against his religion to serve black people, what is your objective test?


>>>>

 

[Crixus]

There are no gay animals. There are animals that exhibit gay behavior when deprived of a suitable mate, but they are not gay.

I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?

It's likely they don't have any. Just needs that need tending so they tend to them without knowing any better.

 

[Crixus]

I see your deflecting from the issue at hand.

You really think there are no objective tests for race or gender?

A black man claiming to be white can be subjected to a number of objective tests, as can a female claiming to be a male.

If a man, not sexually oriented toward other men, claimed to be gay. What objective test could be applied to prove we wasn't?

Perplexing.

A man claims to have found believe in Ahala the day before discriminating against a Jewish customer, what is your objective test to prove he didn't?

The owner of Piggie Park that claimed it was against his religion to serve black people, what is your objective test?


>>>>

There is no objective teast. None. But, there is common sense. If Allah guys don't like Jews that's fine. He can advertise fine jewelry free dinning. He would likely be out of business pretty soon but it's his choice. Same with the baker and gays. Bothell sides are just being stupid here, with the Homosassa being the stupidist. Of all the bakers in the phone book it had to be THAT one right there. Just dumb.

 

[Frank'sRules]

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)

I would think by now that it would have sunken into your brain Seawytch, especially after the 7th circuit just told the country, that race and deviant sex behaviors are not in the same legal or moral or any other type of category together.

Since you're striving to make a comparison, and you're talking about your deviant behaviors, it would be more accurate to say "Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument? The Jews about the nazis putting them to death in death camps." Behavior to behavior; not not-behavior to behavior.

And the nazis had behaviors that were well documented and understood. "LGBTQ" (speaking of delusions) is all over the map and even they aren't sure of their own leanings. Hence why lesbians seek out masculine looking women who use dildos; and gay men seek out the femme (bottom) types for an artificial vagina. I mean HELLO closeted-issues! If heteros were up to the counterpart behavior in their camp, the gays would be screaming "COME OUT OF THE CLOSET ALREADY!" to the rooftops. I guess it only works one way.....which of course then defies logical reasoning...which is the definition of delusional behavior and thoughts..

Behavior and thoughts....behavior and thoughts...........behavior and thoughts...........

Homosexuality will soon be as protected as race, gender, and religion. The path is forward not where you want it to go, back to when gays hid in the closet. Do your job and start dealing with reality. Homosexuals are now almost completely on an equal basis with white Christian heterosexuals. That might suck for you but it doesn't for the rest of us.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There are no gay animals. There are animals that exhibit gay behavior when deprived of a suitable mate, but they are not gay.

I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?

Animals have no sexual orientation. They only have instinct. The instinct is to mate. Animal romance was invented by Disney.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)

I would think by now that it would have sunken into your brain Seawytch, especially after the 7th circuit just told the country, that race and deviant sex behaviors are not in the same legal or moral or any other type of category together.

Since you're striving to make a comparison, and you're talking about your deviant behaviors, it would be more accurate to say "Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument? The Jews about the nazis putting them to death in death camps." Behavior to behavior; not not-behavior to behavior.

And the nazis had behaviors that were well documented and understood. "LGBTQ" (speaking of delusions) is all over the map and even they aren't sure of their own leanings. Hence why lesbians seek out masculine looking women who use dildos; and gay men seek out the femme (bottom) types for an artificial vagina. I mean HELLO closeted-issues! If heteros were up to the counterpart behavior in their camp, the gays would be screaming "COME OUT OF THE CLOSET ALREADY!" to the rooftops. I guess it only works one way.....which of course then defies logical reasoning...which is the definition of delusional behavior and thoughts..

Behavior and thoughts....behavior and thoughts...........behavior and thoughts...........

Homosexuality will soon be as protected as race, gender, and religion. The path is forward not where you want it to go, back to when gays hid in the closet. Do your job and start dealing with reality. Homosexuals are now almost completely on an equal basis with white Christian heterosexuals. That might suck for you but it doesn't for the rest of us.

As it has happened before. Social structures that have normalized homosexuality fail, the gays are slaughtered and we start all over again.

 

[Frank'sRules]

It's not really a matter of religion at all. It's just how it is. It's about what's natural and what's not. We are animals when it comes down to it and we have animal urges that if you look at them are pretty naturel. Homosexuality go's against the laws of nature. That's why there is a naturel aversion to homosexuality.

List of mammals displaying homosexual behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Oh, then all behavior that mammals display are protected rights?

Do I have your argument correct?

Obviously not. That would be an argument against homosexuality is always a choice when it actually only sometimes a choice. Nature doesn't mind gay creatures, you do.

You do realize that delusion is not just a Homo sapien issue, Right?

Homosexuality isn't a delusion unless you think it doesn't exist, and that is a delusion.

There more or less is no objective test. You could see if it mostly has sex with one sex or the other and that's about it. And it might split right down the middle as some primates do.

 

[Frank'sRules]

There are no gay animals. There are animals that exhibit gay behavior when deprived of a suitable mate, but they are not gay.

I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?

Animals have no sexual orientation. They only have instinct. The instinct is to mate. Animal romance was invented by Disney.

They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.

 

[Frank'sRules]

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)

I would think by now that it would have sunken into your brain Seawytch, especially after the 7th circuit just told the country, that race and deviant sex behaviors are not in the same legal or moral or any other type of category together.

Since you're striving to make a comparison, and you're talking about your deviant behaviors, it would be more accurate to say "Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument? The Jews about the nazis putting them to death in death camps." Behavior to behavior; not not-behavior to behavior.

And the nazis had behaviors that were well documented and understood. "LGBTQ" (speaking of delusions) is all over the map and even they aren't sure of their own leanings. Hence why lesbians seek out masculine looking women who use dildos; and gay men seek out the femme (bottom) types for an artificial vagina. I mean HELLO closeted-issues! If heteros were up to the counterpart behavior in their camp, the gays would be screaming "COME OUT OF THE CLOSET ALREADY!" to the rooftops. I guess it only works one way.....which of course then defies logical reasoning...which is the definition of delusional behavior and thoughts..

Behavior and thoughts....behavior and thoughts...........behavior and thoughts...........

Homosexuality will soon be as protected as race, gender, and religion. The path is forward not where you want it to go, back to when gays hid in the closet. Do your job and start dealing with reality. Homosexuals are now almost completely on an equal basis with white Christian heterosexuals. That might suck for you but it doesn't for the rest of us.

As it has happened before. Social structures that have normalized homosexuality fail, the gays are slaughtered and we start all over again.

Your understanding of history is even worse than your understanding of human sexuality. Fear is what drives you and you don't understand that either.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There are no gay animals. There are animals that exhibit gay behavior when deprived of a suitable mate, but they are not gay.

I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?

Animals have no sexual orientation. They only have instinct. The instinct is to mate. Animal romance was invented by Disney.

They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.

They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.

 

[Frank'sRules]

There are no gay animals. There are animals that exhibit gay behavior when deprived of a suitable mate, but they are not gay.

I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?

Animals have no sexual orientation. They only have instinct. The instinct is to mate. Animal romance was invented by Disney.

They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.

They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.

Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have heterosexual sexual partners fully available and yet engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no fucking clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

homosexuality in promates - Google Search

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)

I would think by now that it would have sunken into your brain Seawytch, especially after the 7th circuit just told the country, that race and deviant sex behaviors are not in the same legal or moral or any other type of category together.

Since you're striving to make a comparison, and you're talking about your deviant behaviors, it would be more accurate to say "Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument? The Jews about the nazis putting them to death in death camps." Behavior to behavior; not not-behavior to behavior.

And the nazis had behaviors that were well documented and understood. "LGBTQ" (speaking of delusions) is all over the map and even they aren't sure of their own leanings. Hence why lesbians seek out masculine looking women who use dildos; and gay men seek out the femme (bottom) types for an artificial vagina. I mean HELLO closeted-issues! If heteros were up to the counterpart behavior in their camp, the gays would be screaming "COME OUT OF THE CLOSET ALREADY!" to the rooftops. I guess it only works one way.....which of course then defies logical reasoning...which is the definition of delusional behavior and thoughts..

Behavior and thoughts....behavior and thoughts...........behavior and thoughts...........

Homosexuality will soon be as protected as race, gender, and religion. The path is forward not where you want it to go, back to when gays hid in the closet. Do your job and start dealing with reality. Homosexuals are now almost completely on an equal basis with white Christian heterosexuals. That might suck for you but it doesn't for the rest of us.

As it has happened before. Social structures that have normalized homosexuality fail, the gays are slaughtered and we start all over again.

Your understanding of history is even worse than your understanding of human sexuality. Fear is what drives you and you don't understand that either.

Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument?

Racists.

Connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them should be prohibited by positive law and be subject to no evasion. (Virginia Supreme Court ruling, 1878)

I would think by now that it would have sunken into your brain Seawytch, especially after the 7th circuit just told the country, that race and deviant sex behaviors are not in the same legal or moral or any other type of category together.

Since you're striving to make a comparison, and you're talking about your deviant behaviors, it would be more accurate to say "Know who else used the "it ain't nachrul" argument? The Jews about the nazis putting them to death in death camps." Behavior to behavior; not not-behavior to behavior.

And the nazis had behaviors that were well documented and understood. "LGBTQ" (speaking of delusions) is all over the map and even they aren't sure of their own leanings. Hence why lesbians seek out masculine looking women who use dildos; and gay men seek out the femme (bottom) types for an artificial vagina. I mean HELLO closeted-issues! If heteros were up to the counterpart behavior in their camp, the gays would be screaming "COME OUT OF THE CLOSET ALREADY!" to the rooftops. I guess it only works one way.....which of course then defies logical reasoning...which is the definition of delusional behavior and thoughts..

Behavior and thoughts....behavior and thoughts...........behavior and thoughts...........

Homosexuality will soon be as protected as race, gender, and religion. The path is forward not where you want it to go, back to when gays hid in the closet. Do your job and start dealing with reality. Homosexuals are now almost completely on an equal basis with white Christian heterosexuals. That might suck for you but it doesn't for the rest of us.

As it has happened before. Social structures that have normalized homosexuality fail, the gays are slaughtered and we start all over again.

Your understanding of history is even worse than your understanding of human sexuality. Fear is what drives you and you don't understand that either.

My knowledge of history does quite well. Gays have reached acceptance before. Then that culture is overrun, the Gays are slaughtered and its time to start all over. If that wasn't true, homosexuality would have been accepted as normal for 6,000 or so years.

Sadly, the barbarism of islam is spreading without much in the way of stopping it. That will more than likely be the cause of the next wholesale slaughter.

Not that anyone will care. It's the way the world goes.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There are no gay animals. There are animals that exhibit gay behavior when deprived of a suitable mate, but they are not gay.

I wonder how one objectively tests a monkey to determine its sexual orientation?

Animals have no sexual orientation. They only have instinct. The instinct is to mate. Animal romance was invented by Disney.

They are not just instinct. Like us they learn and adapt.

They don't learn or adapt to homosexuality. Animals have instinct. That instinct is to mate. There is no adapting out. If deprived of an appropriate mate many animals wll engage in the behavior of homosexuality. They aren't in love. They aren't making a romantic connection. When an appropriate mate shows up, the homosexual behavior is abandoned. In fact, in the presence of a female two males will fight to the death.

Your simplistic view of animal sexuality is like your simplistic view of life itself. We have primates that have sexual partners fully available and engage in homosexuality by chose or as a method of conflict resolution or bonding or caste. You have no fucking clue what you are talking about so don't until you learn what's real, not what's dogma.

They engage in homosexuality as a result of dominent behavior, not because they are homosexual.

You have no idea of what motivates animals. You make it up and delude yourself that you are the only one who has a fucking clue.

No wonder Muslims burning gays and stoning them isn't getting more outrage. We're sick of the ass fuckers ourselves.