Bannon GUILTY

[2aguy]

I wonder why these great patriots keep getting fucked in court. 60+ times.

Oh, wait, the court must be corrupt commies who are all "in" on the conspiracy.

Thats an easy answer, twit…….it’s a freaking democrat party court……..in D.C no less………

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Thats an easy answer, twit…….it’s a freaking democrat party court……..in D.C no less………

Pretty much

 

[jc456]

neither did mark meadows.

ooopsie - forgot 'bout him, didn't ya lenny??

So it’s a non jailable offense.

 

[playtime]

Not a win for the American taxpayer.
No telling how many tens of millions of dollars was wasted to charge and convict the guy on two misdemeanor charges. ...

then he shoulda complied.

 

[playtime]

Update!

Legal Expert Mike Davis: Judge Screwed Up and Would Not Allow Steve Bannon to Put Up a Defense in Court — Case Will End Up at Supreme Court​

Legal Expert Mike Davis: Judge Screwed Up and Would Not Allow Steve Bannon to Put Up a Defense in Court -- Case Will End Up at Supreme Court | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Since Monday morning former Chief Strategist for President Trump faced a one-sided and biased court in Washington DC. He was charged with not honoring a subpoena from the January 6 Committee.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

any day now.............

 

[Kondor3]

Nailed the arrogant snotty traitorous little bastard, did they?

 

[beautress]

The truth about the Jan 6 Trump Hatchet Finale committee:

​

 

[j-mac]

As we head down the road to Bannanaville…Brought to you by insane progressives.

 

[playtime]

So it’s a non jailable offense.

Bannon, formerly a Chief Strategist and Counselor to the President, has been a private citizen since departing the White House in 2017. He was indicted on the contempt charges on Nov. 12, 2021.

Bannon is to be sentenced on Oct. 21, 2022. Each count of contempt of Congress carries a minimum of 30 days and a maximum of one year in jail, as well as a fine of $100 to $100,000. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
Stephen K. Bannon Found Guilty by Jury of Two Counts of Contempt of Congress.

neener neener.

 

[Calypso Jones]

I wish the mods would MERGE these topics rather than close them. It is SO annoying to search for a topic and then have to click on each one till you find one that is still open for posting. PLEASE.

Having said that....i have nothing but contempt for this putrid congress.

and it means nothing. Holder was found in contempt of congress. What did they do to him?

Why Steve Bannon's Contempt of Congress Conviction Is a Nothingburger

Liberal America is all about moral victories, I guess. Steve Bannon was found guilty of contempt of Congress. So what? Who cares? The man got subpoenaed by a select committee

townhall.com

 

[Lesh]

Yeah..for this guy it's like just padding his resume~

MSN

www.msn.com

It’s likely gonna get him jail time

 

[j-mac]

The truth about the Jan 6 Trump Hatchet Finale committee:

​

Absolutely…

 

[frigidweirdo]

Apparently, reading this news excites you?


View attachment 673276

Doesn't catching criminals excite you?

 

[Sandy Shanks]

The [Republican] Senate Intelligence Committee reaffirmed its support for the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that the Russian government interfered in the 2016 presidential election with the goal of putting Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

The report represents a confidence-booster to the country’s intelligence community.

www.politico.com

Putin could not be more proud of his protégé. A Russian agent provocateur could not have done a better job, and millions of Americans support the former President.

America fights back.

CNN reports, "The prime-time finale of the compelling and highly produced television saga otherwise known as the House January 6 hearings on Thursday presented a horror show of presidential dereliction of duty and a cliffhanger promise to return with even more damaging evidence against Donald Trump in September."

The committee "embroidered a broader narrative of an out-of-control President who put his own fantastical belief he won an election above more than two centuries of democratic tradition and the national interest. And, most chillingly, it is advancing a case – in the words of a key witness, retired conservative Judge J. Michael Luttig – that Trump remains “a clear and present danger” to US democracy."

CNN continued, "At the start of these hearings, it seemed a stretch that the committee could build a case with criminal implications for the ex-President. That could be changing. Some seasoned lawyers believe that the committee has indeed established evidence of intent by Trump to precipitate the horrendous events leading up to and on January 6 – an important component to any court case.

"But then there is the question of whether a potential prosecution of Trump, as a former President, would be in the national interest – since it could potentially rip even deeper partisan divides in an already internally estranged nation. Establishing a precedent that a former President could be liable to criminal action could be dangerous since it could be misused by future commanders-in-chief to go after their predecessors. These issues could become even more explosive since Trump may soon launch a presidential campaign that would make it easier for him to claim the investigation against him is politically motivated."

Putin is loving this.

 

[whitehall]

Bannon wasn't even in office and he had nothing to do with Jan 6. Obama's Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress but he merely walked away. This is outrageous 3rd world stuff.

 

[Lesh]

Bannon wasn't even in office and he had nothing to do with Jan 6. Obama's Attorney General was held in contempt of Congress but he merely walked away. This is outrageous 3rd world stuff.

He should have complied

 

[mudwhistle]

neither did mark meadows.

ooopsie - forgot 'bout him, didn't ya lenny??

So what. Mark Meadows was working for Trump for a long time and he falls under executive privilege. Steve Bannon only worked for Trump for a short time. Trump waived his right to executive privilege. They're just making an example of him. Neither Steve Bannon or Mark Meadows were involved in anything illegal....but Eric Holder was covering up the transfer of military grade weapons to Mexican drug cartels by the Obama Adm.

Totally different situations.

Never mind the fact that Bannon wouldn't be privy to what happened on Jan 6th...because he had been gone from the White House for years. The committee is just harassing him.

 

[skye]

Steve Bannon, who offered to testify live on TV convicted.

Guy who attempts to MURDER New York Republican candidate release on cashless bail.

What a world the leftists have created.

A world with no Justice, that's what the Left has created.

 

[Lastamender]

I wonder why these great patriots keep getting fucked in court. 60+ times.

Oh, wait, the court must be corrupt commies who are all "in" on the conspiracy.

Because our government is not run by patriots. Duh.

 

[theHawk]

With specific details
Fuck Russia

Did I leave you hanging?

see? You can’t even answer a yes or no question.

I rest my case.