BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 95,882
- 31,926
- 2,250
The Romney video was nothing more than recording what Romney said. The PP video was manipulating the conversation to make it sound a specific way. No where near the same.
The mental exercises you are trying to do to somehow not have to consider and counter what is in the videos is almost comical. These Videos also did nothing but record what the PP people were saying, and by the way they responded, it seems they have heard these questions before. That they were misled does not discredit in any way what they said. The people were pretending to be people interested in tissue samples. by the way the conversations went, this seems to be something that has happened before.
I'm sure tissue samples have been discussed many times before. Exactly which part showed non adherence to any law?
Three questions so far:
1. Did the money made from the tissue exceed the cost of procuring it?
2. Did any PP doctor change their procedure to make getting said tissue easier/get more intact samples?
3. Was some tissue procured without the consent of the patient?
You could have easily added
4. Was Bigfoot involved in any way, or does this have something to do with the WTC attack?
There is just as much evidence for the fourth as there is for the first three,
Have you actually watched the videos? All of those topics were discussed at one point or another.
You can only dodge and dismiss so much before you start looking desperate, and you crossed that line 3 posts ago.
I watched one. No need to watch any more. What do you think a legitimate tissue collection business would discuss? The makers of the video are losing their non profit status for several irregularities in their claims. Nothing more legitimate than that liar that brought down Acorn.